使用.net技术的在线游戏
我是游戏开发新手,但我正在考虑使用实体框架进行 ORM 数据映射和 SQL Server 2008 DB 进行数据存储,在 asp.net mvc3 上创建在线浏览器游戏。 我想听听您对此的想法。 这种方法有什么优点和缺点。为什么它比使用经典的 LAMP 更糟糕。
I am new in game development, but I'm thinking about creating online browser game on asp.net mvc3 using entity framework for ORM data mapping and SQL Server 2008 DB for data data storage.
I would like to hear your thoughts about this.
What advantages and disadvantages of this approach. Why is it worse than using classic LAMP.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
首先是成本。我假设你是为许可证付费的,第二是速度(linux比windows快),第三是可移植性和安全性(apache比IIS更安全,也更快),apache/mysql/php可以在windows上运行,而IIS也可以在Windows上运行。不做其他事情。
据我所知,总的来说 Lamp 托管商比 Windows 托管商更多。
那么PHP比ASP更快(执行速度和开发速度),开发成本更低,更灵活和更轻(即使你使用像symphony或Zend这样的框架)。
示例:Facebook 使用 PHP,Yahoo 使用 PHP,IBM 正在与 PHP 交好。 MySQL 速度快且易于维护。
微软技术是为企业服务的(作为我个人对他们技术的看法,我宁愿保守秘密,IE6的朋友请举手)。如果您选择 PHP 或 MySql,尽管它们的灵活性可能会很棘手,因为您可以做很多事情,但如果您不掌握学校理论,您可能会遇到一个怪物。
first of all costs. As I assume you are paying for the licences, second is speed(linux is faster than windows), third portability and safety (apache is more secure than IIS and also faster) and apache/mysql/php can run on windows while IIS and will not work on something else.
Overall more Lamp hosters than Windows hosters as far as I know.
Then PHP is faster than ASP (execution speed and development speed), cheaper to develop, much more flexible and lighter(even if you use a framework like symphony or Zend).
examples: Facebook works with php, Yahoo works with PHP, IBM is befriending PHP . MySQL is fast and easy to maintain.
Microsoft Technology is for corporations (As my personal opinion on their technology, I rather keep it to my self, raise your hands IE6 friends). If you are going for PHP or MySql though their flexibility can be tricky, as you can do a lot of things, if you do not master your school theory you might end up with a monster.