网上商店法律规定的必填字段
我经营多个网上商店,在允许客户下订单之前,我会向他们询问以下详细信息:
他们的全名、地址(街道、城市、国家/地区、邮政编码)、电子邮件和电话号码。
现在,我有一位客户希望人们能够仅使用他们的姓名(如果他们愿意,可以使用他们的名字)和电子邮件地址来下订单(数字商品)。
这合法吗?这是数字会员资格。其中地址详细信息并不真正需要发挥作用。但法律有什么要求呢?
(ps。我住在荷兰,不知道这是否有很大的不同。尝试搜索谷歌但找不到任何详细信息)
感谢转发
I am running multiple webshops where I ask the following details from my customers before I allow them to place an order:
Their Full Name, Address (street, city, country, postcalcode), E-mail and Phone number.
Now I got a customer who wants people to be able to place an order (for a digital item) with only their Name (just their first name if they prefer) and E-Mail address.
Is this legal? It's for a digital membership. Where Address details aren't really required to function. But what is required by law?
(ps. I live in the netherlands, don't know if this of huge difference. Tried searching google but couldn't find any detailed information about this)
Thanks in forward
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
“你在哪里”(又名管辖权)会产生重大的、巨大的、巨大的差异(更不用说“你是谁”和“你卖什么”)。结果在很大程度上取决于当地法律(国家和欧盟,甚至可能是当地法律?)以及您的具体情况。 IIRC(不确定具体细节)荷兰自 2009 年以来制定了一些非常特殊的在线隐私法,因此您最好咨询您的律师 - 问题本身更多的是关于法律而不是编程。
因此,我们无法真正为您提供帮助 - 0) 不同国家/地区的法律差异很大,1) 我们是程序员,而不是律师,2) 即使我们是,我们也不会成为您的律师。是的,咨询律师可能不会免费,甚至可能不便宜;唉,我没有看到任何其他合理的选择。
"Where you are" (a.k.a. jurisdiction) makes a major, huge, humongous difference (not to speak about "who you are" and "what you are selling"). The result depends very much on the local laws (country and EU, possibly even local?), and your specific situation. IIRC (not sure about specifics) the NL has some very special online privacy law since 2009, so you better check with your lawyer - the question itself is much more about law than programming.
Therefore, we can't really help you here - 0) law differs significantly across countries, 1) we're programmers, not lawyers, and 2) even if we were, we wouldn't be your lawyers. Yes, consulting a lawyer probably won't be free, probably not even cheap; alas, I don't see any other reasonable option.