Windows 上 Rails3 的工作 IDE
我在 Windows 中为 Rails3 配置 NetBeans 时遇到了困难。我遇到了很多问题，甚至在这里也报告了很多问题。
所以我的问题是：以下哪个 IDE 目前最适合 Windows Box 中的 Rails3：
RubyMine
Komodo IDE
RadRails
看，我不想开始讨论（有点 x 与 y）。我只是想从已经在 Windows 上使用 Rails3 进行开发的人们那里了解从长远来看什么是更好的选择。
谢谢！
编辑
NetBeans 问题
注意：我现在使用 RubyMine，没有遇到任何问题
I´m having a hard time configuring NetBeans for Rails3 in Windows. I got a lot of problems, many o then reported even here.
So my question is: which of the following IDEs are best situated for Rails3 in a Windows Box right now:
RubyMine
Komodo IDE
RadRails
Look, i dont want to start a discussion (kinda x vs y). I just want to know from people who already are developing in Rails3 with Windows what is the better choice in the long run.
Thanks!
EDIT
Issues with NetBeans
Note: Im using RubyMine by now and facing no problems
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（9）
我正在使用
RubyMine。
您可以免费试用 30 天。在使用 RubyMine 之前，我也使用过 NetBeans for Rails。但我不得不说 RubyMine 是物有所值的。
I'm using
RubyMine.
You can try it for free for 30 days. Before my time with RubyMine, I've used NetBeans for Rails too. But I have to say RubyMine is the money worth.
我喜欢Redcar。非常漂亮的IDE，类似TextMate
I like Redcar. Very beautiful IDE, similar TextMate
当我在 Windows 上开发 Rails 时，我使用 Aptana RadRails 或 Aptana Studio（几乎是同一件事）。它们有点重量级，但总的来说我喜欢 Eclipse 界面。它在语法突出显示和自动更正方面通常比 TextMate 做得更好，并且具有更好的键盘快捷键。 TextMate/Mac 的粉丝可能会因为我这么说而追随我。如果您有足够的空闲内存，Aptana 是您的最佳选择。
When I develop Rails on Windows, I use Aptana RadRails or Aptana Studio (pretty much the same thing). They are a little bit heavyweight, but I like the Eclipse interface in general. It often does better at syntax highlighting and autocorrecting than TextMate and has vastly better keyboard shortcuts. The TextMate/Mac fanboys are probably going to come after me for saying that. If you have plenty of memory to spare, Aptana is the way to go.
我使用 RubyMine，但他们的 Java IDE 有一个带有 Ruby 插件的免费社区版本，它确实具有 RubyMine 的功能，FWIW。
老实说，您可能会收到很多回复说没有 IDE...VIM、Emacs 等...
I use RubyMine, but their Java IDE has a free community edition with a Ruby plugin, which does have of what RubyMine does, FWIW.
Though to be honest, you will probably get a lot of responses saying no IDE... VIM, Emacs etc...
阿普塔纳看起来不错。但我认为 RadRails 仅支持 Rails 2。Aptana studio 3 Beta 具有成熟的 Rails 3 界面。
Aptana 还解决了 Windows 中的许多 RoR 安装问题（这可能会变得非常混乱）。所以我认为 aptana 是正确的选择
Aptana looks good. But I think RadRails supports only Rails 2. Aptana studio 3 Beta has a full fledged Rails 3 interface.
Also Aptana solves many RoR installation issues in Windows (which can get very messy) . So I think aptana is the way to go
我喜欢 RubyMine，因为它速度非常快并且性能出色。
I like RubyMine, as it's pretty fast and does a great job.
作为 P2PU 课程的一部分，我写了一些流行编辑器的简短描述。滚动到第 1 周课程中的“选择程序员的编辑器”。
I wrote up a brief description of some popular editors as a part of my P2PU course. Scroll to "Choosing a Programmer's Editor" on the week 1 curriculum.
从 IDE 入手绝对可以帮助您入门，尤其是像 RubyMine 这样的 IDE，因为它主要是跨平台的。
然而，学习 Vim 或 Emacs 这样的编辑器还有其他好处，比如能够完全跨平台。更重要的是，它们在磁盘空间和内存使用方面都很轻量。虽然使用 IDE 可能有助于您学习一门语言（因为您可以获得语法补全、文档等），但学习编辑器可能会带来使用 IDE 的人只能梦想的那种电源使用（但这需要一段时间）在 Vim 或 Emacs 之类的东西上达到这一点）。
Starting with an IDE can definitely get you started, especially one like RubyMine since it's mostly cross platform.
However, learning an editor like Vim or Emacs has other benefits like being able to be completely cross-platform. More importantly, they're lightweight both in disk space and in memory usage. While using an IDE might assist in you learning a language (because you get syntax completion, documentation, etc), learning an editor can lead to the kind of power usage that one using an IDE can only dream of (but it will take a while to get to that point on something like Vim or Emacs).
e-texteditor 将是一个不错的选择。
e-texteditor would be a good choice.