如何系统且透明地重写 Python 方法

发布于 2024-10-12 15:15:53 字数 1397 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我正在寻找一个“简单”的解决方案来系统地覆盖Python中的一些继承方法(=>2.6)。根据我之前的问题此处,我将提出一个解决方案:

def override(cls, o):
"""Override class method(s)."""
for t in o: # possible problem; nondeterministic order
    for name in o[t]:
        mtbo= getattr(cls, name).im_func
        om= t(mtbo)
        om.__name__= mtbo.__name__
        om.__doc__= mtbo.__doc__
        # What additional magic is needed here to act as 'genuine' method of super class?
        setattr(cls, name, om)

if __name__== '__main__':
    class B(object):
        def f1(self, val):
            """Doc of B.f1"""; print '1: ', val
        def f2(self, val):
            """Doc of B.f2"""; print '2: ', val
    class A(B):
        pass

    def t(f, msg):
        def g(self, *args, **kwargs):
            print msg, ' entering'; result= f(self, *args, **kwargs)
        return g
    t1= lambda f: t(f, 't1'); t2= lambda f: t(f, 't2')
    override(A, {t1: ['f1', 'f2'], t2: ['f2']})

    def tst(c):
        c.f1(1); print c.f1.__name__, c.f1.__doc__
        c.f2(2); print c.f2.__name__, c.f2.__doc__
    tst(B()), tst(A())

这似乎足以满足我(当前)的目的。不过,我希望能够尽可能透明地覆盖,因此我将保留超类方法名称和文档。现在我的具体问题是:我应该保留其他东西吗?您对此有何解决方案?

更新: 我认为现在这个问题具有更广泛的影响:我想我应该(最初)问如何以足够合理的Python方式装饰方法或函数。

I'm looking for a 'simple' solution to override systematically some inherited methods in Python (=>2.6). Based on my previous question here, I'll come up a solution:

def override(cls, o):
"""Override class method(s)."""
for t in o: # possible problem; nondeterministic order
    for name in o[t]:
        mtbo= getattr(cls, name).im_func
        om= t(mtbo)
        om.__name__= mtbo.__name__
        om.__doc__= mtbo.__doc__
        # What additional magic is needed here to act as 'genuine' method of super class?
        setattr(cls, name, om)

if __name__== '__main__':
    class B(object):
        def f1(self, val):
            """Doc of B.f1"""; print '1: ', val
        def f2(self, val):
            """Doc of B.f2"""; print '2: ', val
    class A(B):
        pass

    def t(f, msg):
        def g(self, *args, **kwargs):
            print msg, ' entering'; result= f(self, *args, **kwargs)
        return g
    t1= lambda f: t(f, 't1'); t2= lambda f: t(f, 't2')
    override(A, {t1: ['f1', 'f2'], t2: ['f2']})

    def tst(c):
        c.f1(1); print c.f1.__name__, c.f1.__doc__
        c.f2(2); print c.f2.__name__, c.f2.__doc__
    tst(B()), tst(A())

This seems to work well enough for my (current) purposes. However I like to be able to override as transparent as possible, therefore I'll preserve the super class methods name and doc. Now my specific question is: should I preserve anything else? What is your solution for this?

Update:
I think now this questions has much wider ramifications: I quess I should have asked (originally) how to decorate methods, or functions reasonable enough pythonic way.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

情深已缘浅 2024-10-19 15:15:53

您可以只调用 functools.update_wrapper 来确保复制相关属性,而不是手动分配 __name__ 、 __doc__ 以及其他可能的值。

Instead of manually assigning __name__, __doc__, and possibly others, you can likely just call functools.update_wrapper to ensure the relevant attributes are copied.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文