I was always impressed by Ivona http://www.ivona.com/?set_lang=en They have a cheap personal version called expressivo (add .com - can't post more links) which is just $45. I know people who watch movies with Expressivo reading the subtitles, so it's actually very very good.
AT&T has a product called Natural Voices. I think that is sounds amazing compared with all of the other products out there. I'm not sure about pricing though.
Basically, it's a high level tutorial to use voices available from Android on Linux. It's quite general, but the technic should work for most TTS engine.
然而，我不太喜欢他们的 GUI 和集成。我基本上将所有想要读取的文本复制到 GUI 窗口中。然而，新版本还可以从文件中读取 pdf 和 word 文档。对我来说，最重要的因素仍然是即使结构复杂，也能轻松聆听和理解文本。
Linguatec 看起来像一家德国小公司。我不知道他们是否有自己的 TTS 引擎或使用外部引擎。
我与 Linguatec 没有任何关系，并且对替代建议非常感兴趣！
I did some research on the topic in 2007 and tried several text to speech systems to read articles or convert them to mp3. I am surprised how little progress the consumer TTS products have made since then.
First I bought TextAloud by NextUp because in the web samples the voices sounded natural. However, it turned out that the way parts of the sentences were stressed made it really hard to understand scientific texts. I don't know if that has improved.
I then found the VoiceReader Home by Linguatec (49 Euro per voice) which did a very good job and I haven't found a better solution for myself since then. Linguatec just did an update which I have been using for a few weeks now and the quality improved even more.
However, I don't like their GUI and integration as much. I basically copy all texts that I want to read into the GUI window. Yet, the new version can also read pdf and word documents from file. And for me the most important factor is still the ease of listening and understanding of text even with a complex structure.
Linguatec looks like a small German company. I don’t know if they have their own TTS engine or use an external one.
I am not associated with Linguatec in any way and would be very interested in alternative suggestions!
Surprisingly, loquendo does sell stuff: Price list for Pay as you go TTS. Unfortunately, this works online when online, and costs a fortune for on-demand voice generation (30 minutes a day would come just under 120.000€ per year).
Nuance vocalizer but im afraid they do not say something about the prices. Nuance has a lot of high quality speech applications, so maybe they can make you happy.
For personal use, I'm using VocaTalk Personal Podcast. The app enhances speech, makes it stereo, puts bg music, generates mp3, uploads to skydrive/google drive, syncs up with iTunes or zune and what not. Perfect for on-the-go listening. http://www.vocamedia.com/
For personal use you could also use "TextAid" from ReadSpeaker. It is web based personal reader and uses Acapela voices. It also has a translation feature! http://www.readspeaker.com/readspeaker-textaid/
发布评论
评论（14）
从 NextUp.com 网站购买：
还有：
Purchase it from NextUp.com site:
There are also:
Ivona 一直给我留下深刻的印象 http://www.ivona.com/?set_lang=en
他们有一个便宜的个人版本，称为expressivo（添加.com - 无法发布更多链接），只需45 美元。我知道有人用 Expressivo 看电影并阅读字幕，所以它实际上非常非常好。
I was always impressed by Ivona http://www.ivona.com/?set_lang=en
They have a cheap personal version called expressivo (add .com - can't post more links) which is just $45. I know people who watch movies with Expressivo reading the subtitles, so it's actually very very good.
您可以为节日下载比附带的声音质量更好的声音：
这些似乎是目前质量最高的声音：
基于 HMM 的语音合成系统 (HTS)
这些似乎也可以：
MBROLA 项目
来源：
HOWTO：让节日 TTS 使用更好的声音 (MBROLA / CMU / HTS)
You can download better quality voices for festival than the ones shipped with it:
These seem to be the ones with the highest quality right now:
HMM-based Speech Synthesis System (HTS)
These seem to be ok too:
The MBROLA Project
Source:
HOWTO: Make festival TTS use better voices (MBROLA / CMU / HTS)
AT&T 有一款名为 Natural Voices 的产品。我认为与所有其他产品相比，这听起来很棒。不过我不确定定价。
http://www2.research.att.com/~ttsweb/tts/demo .php
AT&T has a product called Natural Voices. I think that is sounds amazing compared with all of the other products out there. I'm not sure about pricing though.
http://www2.research.att.com/~ttsweb/tts/demo.php
还有一些令人印象深刻的开源解决方案。
这听起来相当令人印象深刻。
http://freetts.sourceforge.net/docs/index.php
There are also some quite impressive open source solutions.
This one sounds quite impressive.
http://freetts.sourceforge.net/docs/index.php
请检查此网站 基本上，这是一个
在 Linux 上使用 Android 提供的语音的高级教程。
它非常通用，但该技术应该适用于大多数 TTS 引擎。
Please check this site
Basically, it's a high level tutorial to use voices available from Android on Linux.
It's quite general, but the technic should work for most TTS engine.
我在 2007 年对此主题进行了一些研究，并尝试了几种文本转语音系统来阅读文章或将其转换为 mp3。令我惊讶的是，从那时起，消费者 TTS 产品几乎没有取得任何进展。
首先，我购买了 NextUp 的 TextAloud，因为在网络样本中，声音听起来很自然。然而，事实证明，句子部分的重读方式使得科学文本很难理解。我不知道情况是否有所改善。
然后我找到了 Linguatec 的 VoiceReader Home（每个语音 49 欧元），它做了一个非常好的工作，从那时起我就没有为自己找到更好的解决方案。 Linguatec 刚刚进行了更新，我已经使用了几周，质量得到了进一步提高。
然而，我不太喜欢他们的 GUI 和集成。我基本上将所有想要读取的文本复制到 GUI 窗口中。然而，新版本还可以从文件中读取 pdf 和 word 文档。对我来说，最重要的因素仍然是即使结构复杂，也能轻松聆听和理解文本。
Linguatec 看起来像一家德国小公司。我不知道他们是否有自己的 TTS 引擎或使用外部引擎。
我与 Linguatec 没有任何关系，并且对替代建议非常感兴趣！
I did some research on the topic in 2007 and tried several text to speech systems to read articles or convert them to mp3. I am surprised how little progress the consumer TTS products have made since then.
First I bought TextAloud by NextUp because in the web samples the voices sounded natural. However, it turned out that the way parts of the sentences were stressed made it really hard to understand scientific texts. I don't know if that has improved.
I then found the VoiceReader Home by Linguatec (49 Euro per voice) which did a very good job and I haven't found a better solution for myself since then. Linguatec just did an update which I have been using for a few weeks now and the quality improved even more.
However, I don't like their GUI and integration as much. I basically copy all texts that I want to read into the GUI window. Yet, the new version can also read pdf and word documents from file. And for me the most important factor is still the ease of listening and understanding of text even with a complex structure.
Linguatec looks like a small German company. I don’t know if they have their own TTS engine or use an external one.
I am not associated with Linguatec in any way and would be very interested in alternative suggestions!
令人惊讶的是，loquendo 确实卖东西：现收现付 TTS 的价格表。不幸的是，这在在线时在线工作，并且按需语音生成的成本很高（每天 30 分钟每年的费用略低于120.000€）。
Surprisingly, loquendo does sell stuff: Price list for Pay as you go TTS. Unfortunately, this works online when online, and costs a fortune for on-demand voice generation (30 minutes a day would come just under 120.000€ per year).
Nuancevocalizer 但恐怕他们没有说关于价格的一些事情。 Nuance 有很多高质量的语音应用程序，所以也许它们可以让您满意。
Nuance vocalizer but im afraid they do not say something about the prices. Nuance has a lot of high quality speech applications, so maybe they can make you happy.
我使用过 AT&T Natural Voices，它们对我来说听起来最人性化。
I've used AT&T Natural Voices, they seem to sound most human to me.
对于个人用途，我使用 VocaTalk 个人播客。该应用程序增强语音、使其立体声、放置背景音乐、生成 mp3、上传到 skydrive/google 驱动器、与 iTunes 或 zune 同步等等。非常适合在旅途中聆听。
http://www.vocamedia.com/
For personal use, I'm using VocaTalk Personal Podcast. The app enhances speech, makes it stereo, puts bg music, generates mp3, uploads to skydrive/google drive, syncs up with iTunes or zune and what not. Perfect for on-the-go listening.
http://www.vocamedia.com/
对于个人用途，您还可以使用 ReadSpeaker 中的“TextAid”。它是基于网络的个人阅读器，使用 Acapela 语音。它还具有翻译功能！
http://www.readspeaker.com/readspeaker-textaid/
For personal use you could also use "TextAid" from ReadSpeaker. It is web based personal reader and uses Acapela voices. It also has a translation feature!
http://www.readspeaker.com/readspeaker-textaid/
在线生成语音怎么样？您可以使用免费网站 audiotext.ws 文本转语音 将英文文本转换为语音。
What about generating speech online? You can use the free website audiotext.ws text to speech to convert English texts to speech.
如果您正在寻找基于印度口音的输出，请查看 http://www.indiantts.com
它似乎听起来最人类，印度方言。他们提供下载 mp3 选项，我认为是从文本中。
If you are looking for indian accent based output, take a look http://www.indiantts.com
It seem to sound most human ,Indian dialects.They offer download mp3 option I think from text.