WPS 与 SAS 的兼容性如何？
WPS SAS 克隆与 SAS Institute 相应产品的兼容性如何？ 有没有人尝试过 - 如果是的话：您遇到过任何兼容性问题吗？
How compatible is the WPS SAS-clone with the corresponding products from SAS Institute?
Has anyone tried it - if so: have you run into any compatibility issues?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
WPS 在其网站上提供了一份很好的比较文档。它列出了 WPS 和 SAS 兼容的区域以及不兼容的区域。从 http://www.teamwpc.co.uk/products/wps/language
我已经尝试过，虽然时间很短，而且是三年前的事。我的一位前同事专门使用它作为 SAS 的替代品。他的功能基本上没有问题，但在一些更晦涩的过程或函数上确实遇到了一些与语法相关的奇怪问题。
WPS 确实提供免费试用，因此您不会有任何损失。试一试吗？
WPS has a good comparison document available on their website. It lists areas where WPS and SAS are compatible and where they are not. Start in http://www.teamwpc.co.uk/products/wps/language
I have tried it, although briefly and three years ago. I have a former co-worker that uses it exclusively as an alternative to SAS. He manages to function mostly without problems, but does run into some syntax related oddities on some of the more obscure procedures or functions.
WPS does offer a free trial, so you've nothing to lose with that. Give it a shot?
我真的没有答案，但是你尝试过 SAS-L？我相信你会在那里找到对此有强烈意见的人。此外，已经有几个可用的线程，它们可能会帮助您入门。
I don't really have an answer, but have you tried SAS-L? I'm sure you'll find people there with strong opinions about this. Also there are a couple of threads available already, which might get you started.
我的 2 美分：
我已经尝试 WPS 一段时间了，只要您不使用基础语言中的一些高级内容，它确实可以作为 SAS 的工作替代品。
我自己的经验中的一些例子：
FETCH()一次读取一行时，您无法使用CALL SET()自动初始化输入数据集中找到的所有变量。简而言之：如果您安装了有效的 SAS，请请求 WPS 试用并测试它是否适合您的使用。如果确实如此，那么肯定会节省大量许可费用。
My 2 cents:
I've tried WPS for some time and it does indeed make for a SAS working substitute as long as you keep yourself from using some advanced stuff from the base language.
A few examples from my own experience:
FETCH()you cannot useCALL SET()for automatically initializing all the variables found in the input dataset.In a few words: if you have a working SAS installation, ask for a WPS trial and test if it fits your use. If it does, be sure it's a tremendous save in licensing.