All of these are practically well used in broadcast productions and are of good grade. The order doesn't reflect any preference. Most of them are either usable as SDK or independent application with dongle or otherwise.
However, your fear is rather fundamental, and fleeing DLL might not be possible to be prevented trivially.
Are you going to require your own videocard drivers as well, or what happens if I use a video driver that does whatever I want with what your decoder sends me? Are you going to somehow force users to use only your video cables as well, and somehow destroy any video camera in the vicinity, and wipe clean the users' memories of what they see? Such madness! So what if you use a GPL library? You cannot lock down the Universe.
发布评论
评论（4）
您只能尝试商业版：
Elcard：http://www.elecard.com /en/download/products.html
Ligos：http://ligos.com/index.php/home/products/mediarig_encoder/
MainConcept：http://www.mainconcept.com/products/sdks/video.html
Rohzet（碳编码器）：http://www.rhozet.com/products.html
翻转工厂：http://www.telestream.net/flipfactory/overview.htm< /p>
所有这些都在广播制作中得到了很好的应用，并且质量很好。
该顺序并不反映任何偏好。其中大多数可用作 SDK 或带有加密狗或其他方式的独立应用程序。
然而，您的担心是相当根本的，并且可能无法轻易阻止逃离 DLL。
You can only try Commercial ones:
Elcard : http://www.elecard.com/en/download/products.html
Ligos : http://ligos.com/index.php/home/products/mediarig_encoder/
MainConcept : http://www.mainconcept.com/products/sdks/video.html
Rohzet (carbon coder) : http://www.rhozet.com/products.html
Flip factory : http://www.telestream.net/flipfactory/overview.htm
All of these are practically well used in broadcast productions and are of good grade.
The order doesn't reflect any preference. Most of them are either usable as SDK or independent application with dongle or otherwise.
However, your fear is rather fundamental, and fleeing DLL might not be possible to be prevented trivially.
我的印象是 CoreAVC 是迄今为止性能最好的 H.264 编解码器。 http://corecodec.com/products/coreavc
I was under the impression that CoreAVC is by far the best performant H.264 codec. http://corecodec.com/products/coreavc
取决于你所说的非 GPL 是什么意思。有许多是 LGPL（因此非病毒式）。
就像最流行的 libavcodec 一样，它是 FFmpeg 的一部分。
相比之下，x264（GPL-ed）仅用于编码，而不用于解码。
FFmpeg 清楚地说明了如何以非病毒方式编译它。
Depends what you mean by non-GPL. There are many that are LGPL (thus non-viral).
Like the most popular one libavcodec which is part of FFmpeg.
By contrast x264, which is GPL-ed, is only needed for encoding, not for decoding.
FFmpeg makes it clear how to compile it in non-viral way.
您是否还需要自己的视频卡驱动程序，或者如果我使用一个视频驱动程序，该视频驱动程序可以根据您的解码器发送给我的内容执行我想要的任何操作，会发生什么情况？您是否会以某种方式强迫用户也只使用您的视频电缆，并以某种方式摧毁附近的任何摄像机，并清除用户对他们所看到的内容的记忆？太疯狂了！那么如果你使用 GPL 库呢？你无法锁定宇宙。
Are you going to require your own videocard drivers as well, or what happens if I use a video driver that does whatever I want with what your decoder sends me? Are you going to somehow force users to use only your video cables as well, and somehow destroy any video camera in the vicinity, and wipe clean the users' memories of what they see? Such madness! So what if you use a GPL library? You cannot lock down the Universe.