Solr WordDelimiterFilter + Lucene 荧光笔

发布于 2024-10-09 23:19:41 字数 4110 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我正在尝试从 Lucene 获取 Highlighter 类,以便与来自 Solr 的 WordDelimiterFilter 的标记正常工作。它在 90% 的情况下都有效,但如果匹配文本包含“,”(例如“1,500”),则输出不正确:

预期:“测试 1,500 这个”

观察到:“测试 11,500 这个”

我目前不确定是荧光笔搞乱了重组还是 WordDelimiterFilter 弄乱了标记化,但有些东西很不高兴。以下是我的 pom 中的相关依赖项:

org.apache.lucene lucene核心 2.9.3 罐 编译 org.apache.lucene lucene 荧光笔 2.9.3 罐 编译 org.apache.solr solr核心 1.4.0 罐 编译

这是一个简单的 JUnit 测试类,演示了该问题:

package test.lucene;


import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;


import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.Reader;
import java.util.HashMap;


import org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.TokenStream;
import org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException;
import org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser;
import org.apache.lucene.search.Query;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.Highlighter;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.InvalidTokenOffsetsException;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.QueryScorer;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.SimpleFragmenter;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.SimpleHTMLFormatter;
import org.apache.lucene.util.Version;
import org.apache.solr.analysis.StandardTokenizerFactory;
import org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory;
import org.junit.Test;


public class HighlighterTester {
    private static final String PRE_TAG = "<b>";
    private static final String POST_TAG = "</b>";

    private static String[] highlightField( Query query, String fieldName, String text )
            throws IOException, InvalidTokenOffsetsException {
        SimpleHTMLFormatter formatter = new SimpleHTMLFormatter( PRE_TAG, POST_TAG );
        Highlighter highlighter = new Highlighter( formatter, new QueryScorer( query, fieldName ) );
        highlighter.setTextFragmenter( new SimpleFragmenter( Integer.MAX_VALUE ) );
        return highlighter.getBestFragments( getAnalyzer(), fieldName, text, 10 );
    }

    private static Analyzer getAnalyzer() {
        return new Analyzer() {
            @Override
            public TokenStream tokenStream( String fieldName, Reader reader ) {
                // Start with a StandardTokenizer
                TokenStream stream = new StandardTokenizerFactory().create( reader );

                // Chain on a WordDelimiterFilter
                WordDelimiterFilterFactory wordDelimiterFilterFactory = new WordDelimiterFilterFactory();
                HashMap<String, String> arguments = new HashMap<String, String>();
                arguments.put( "generateWordParts", "1" );
                arguments.put( "generateNumberParts", "1" );
                arguments.put( "catenateWords", "1" );
                arguments.put( "catenateNumbers", "1" );
                arguments.put( "catenateAll", "0" );
                wordDelimiterFilterFactory.init( arguments );

                return wordDelimiterFilterFactory.create( stream );
            }
        };
    }

    @Test
    public void TestHighlighter() throws ParseException, IOException, InvalidTokenOffsetsException {
        String fieldName = "text";
        String text = "test 1,500 this";
        String queryString = "1500";
        String expected = "test " + PRE_TAG + "1,500" + POST_TAG + " this";

        QueryParser parser = new QueryParser( Version.LUCENE_29, fieldName, getAnalyzer() );
        Query q = parser.parse( queryString );
        String[] observed = highlightField( q, fieldName, text );
        for ( int i = 0; i < observed.length; i++ ) {
            System.out.println( "\t" + i + ": '" + observed[i] + "'" );
        }
        if ( observed.length > 0 ) {
            System.out.println( "Expected: '" + expected + "'\n" + "Observed: '" + observed[0] + "'" );
            assertEquals( expected, observed[0] );
        }
        else {
            assertTrue( "No matches found", false );
        }
    }
}

有人有任何想法或建议吗?

I am trying to get the Highlighter class from Lucene to work properly with tokens coming from Solr's WordDelimiterFilter. It works 90% of the time, but if the matching text contains a ',' such as "1,500" the output is incorrect:

Expected: 'test 1,500 this'

Observed: 'test 11,500 this'

I am not currently sure whether it is Highlighter messing up the recombination or WordDelimiterFilter messing up the tokenization but something is unhappy. Here are the relevant dependencies from my pom:

org.apache.lucene
lucene-core
2.9.3
jar
compile

org.apache.lucene
lucene-highlighter
2.9.3
jar
compile

org.apache.solr
solr-core
1.4.0
jar
compile

And here is a simple JUnit test class demonstrating the problem:

package test.lucene;


import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;


import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.Reader;
import java.util.HashMap;


import org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.TokenStream;
import org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException;
import org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser;
import org.apache.lucene.search.Query;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.Highlighter;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.InvalidTokenOffsetsException;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.QueryScorer;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.SimpleFragmenter;
import org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.SimpleHTMLFormatter;
import org.apache.lucene.util.Version;
import org.apache.solr.analysis.StandardTokenizerFactory;
import org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory;
import org.junit.Test;


public class HighlighterTester {
    private static final String PRE_TAG = "<b>";
    private static final String POST_TAG = "</b>";

    private static String[] highlightField( Query query, String fieldName, String text )
            throws IOException, InvalidTokenOffsetsException {
        SimpleHTMLFormatter formatter = new SimpleHTMLFormatter( PRE_TAG, POST_TAG );
        Highlighter highlighter = new Highlighter( formatter, new QueryScorer( query, fieldName ) );
        highlighter.setTextFragmenter( new SimpleFragmenter( Integer.MAX_VALUE ) );
        return highlighter.getBestFragments( getAnalyzer(), fieldName, text, 10 );
    }

    private static Analyzer getAnalyzer() {
        return new Analyzer() {
            @Override
            public TokenStream tokenStream( String fieldName, Reader reader ) {
                // Start with a StandardTokenizer
                TokenStream stream = new StandardTokenizerFactory().create( reader );

                // Chain on a WordDelimiterFilter
                WordDelimiterFilterFactory wordDelimiterFilterFactory = new WordDelimiterFilterFactory();
                HashMap<String, String> arguments = new HashMap<String, String>();
                arguments.put( "generateWordParts", "1" );
                arguments.put( "generateNumberParts", "1" );
                arguments.put( "catenateWords", "1" );
                arguments.put( "catenateNumbers", "1" );
                arguments.put( "catenateAll", "0" );
                wordDelimiterFilterFactory.init( arguments );

                return wordDelimiterFilterFactory.create( stream );
            }
        };
    }

    @Test
    public void TestHighlighter() throws ParseException, IOException, InvalidTokenOffsetsException {
        String fieldName = "text";
        String text = "test 1,500 this";
        String queryString = "1500";
        String expected = "test " + PRE_TAG + "1,500" + POST_TAG + " this";

        QueryParser parser = new QueryParser( Version.LUCENE_29, fieldName, getAnalyzer() );
        Query q = parser.parse( queryString );
        String[] observed = highlightField( q, fieldName, text );
        for ( int i = 0; i < observed.length; i++ ) {
            System.out.println( "\t" + i + ": '" + observed[i] + "'" );
        }
        if ( observed.length > 0 ) {
            System.out.println( "Expected: '" + expected + "'\n" + "Observed: '" + observed[0] + "'" );
            assertEquals( expected, observed[0] );
        }
        else {
            assertTrue( "No matches found", false );
        }
    }
}

Anyone have any ideas or suggestions?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

心奴独伤 2024-10-16 23:19:41

经过进一步调查,这似乎是 Lucene Highlighter 代码中的一个错误。正如您在此处所看到的:

public class TokenGroup {

    ...

    protected boolean isDistinct() {
        return offsetAtt.startOffset() >= endOffset;
    }

    ...

该代码尝试通过检查起始偏移量是否大于前一个结束偏移量来确定一组标记是否不同。这个问题说明了这种方法的问题。如果您要单步执行这些标记,您会看到它们如下所示:

0-4: 'test', 'test'
5-6: '1', '1'
7-10: '500', '500'
5-10: '1500', '1,500'
11-15: 'this', 'this'

从这里您可以看到第三个标记在第二个标记结束后开始,但第四个标记与第二个标记在同一位置开始。预期的结果是将标记 2、3 和 4 分组,但根据此实现,标记 3 被视为与 2 分开,因此 2 单独显示,然后 3 和 4 分组,留下以下结果:

Expected: 'test <b>1,500</b> this'
Observed: 'test 1<b>1,500</b> this'

我不是确保这无需两次传递即可完成,一次获取所有索引,第二次将它们组合起来。另外,我不确定在这个特定案例之外会产生什么影响。这里有人有什么想法吗?

编辑

这是我想出的最终源代码。它将正确地对事物进行分组。它似乎也比 Lucene 荧光笔实现简单得多,但不可否认的是,它不能处理不同级别的评分,因为我的应用程序只需要确定文本片段是否突出显示是/否。还值得注意的是,我使用他们的 QueryScorer 对文本片段进行评分,该文本片段确实存在面向术语而不是面向短语的弱点,这意味着搜索字符串“语法或拼写”最终会突出显示,看起来像这样“< b>语法或拼写”,因为 或 很可能会被分析器丢弃。无论如何,这是我的来源:

public TextFragments<E> getTextFragments( TokenStream tokenStream,
        String text,
        Scorer scorer )
        throws IOException, InvalidTokenOffsetsException {
    OffsetAttribute offsetAtt = (OffsetAttribute) tokenStream.addAttribute( OffsetAttribute.class );
    TermAttribute termAtt = (TermAttribute) tokenStream.addAttribute( TermAttribute.class );
    TokenStream newStream = scorer.init( tokenStream );
    if ( newStream != null ) {
        tokenStream = newStream;
    }

    TokenGroups tgs = new TokenGroups();
    scorer.startFragment( null );
    while ( tokenStream.incrementToken() ) {
        tgs.add( offsetAtt.startOffset(), offsetAtt.endOffset(), scorer.getTokenScore() );
        if ( log.isTraceEnabled() ) {
            log.trace( new StringBuilder()
                    .append( scorer.getTokenScore() )
                    .append( " " )
                    .append( offsetAtt.startOffset() )
                    .append( "-" )
                    .append( offsetAtt.endOffset() )
                    .append( ": '" )
                    .append( termAtt.term() )
                    .append( "', '" )
                    .append( text.substring( offsetAtt.startOffset(), offsetAtt.endOffset() ) )
                    .append( "'" )
                    .toString() );
        }
    }

    return tgs.fragment( text );
}

private class TokenGroup {
    private int startIndex;
    private int endIndex;
    private float score;

    public TokenGroup( int startIndex, int endIndex, float score ) {
        this.startIndex = startIndex;
        this.endIndex = endIndex;
        this.score = score;
    }
}

private class TokenGroups implements Iterable<TokenGroup> {
    private List<TokenGroup> tgs;

    public TokenGroups() {
        tgs = new ArrayList<TokenGroup>();
    }

    public void add( int startIndex, int endIndex, float score ) {
        add( new TokenGroup( startIndex, endIndex, score ) );
    }

    public void add( TokenGroup tg ) {
        for ( int i = tgs.size() - 1; i >= 0; i-- ) {
            if ( tg.startIndex < tgs.get( i ).endIndex ) {
                tg = merge( tg, tgs.remove( i ) );
            }
            else {
                break;
            }
        }
        tgs.add( tg );
    }

    private TokenGroup merge( TokenGroup tg1, TokenGroup tg2 ) {
        return new TokenGroup( Math.min( tg1.startIndex, tg2.startIndex ),
                Math.max( tg1.endIndex, tg2.endIndex ),
                Math.max( tg1.score, tg2.score ) );
    }

    private TextFragments<E> fragment( String text ) {
        TextFragments<E> fragments = new TextFragments<E>();

        int lastEndIndex = 0;
        for ( TokenGroup tg : this ) {
            if ( tg.startIndex > lastEndIndex ) {
                fragments.add( text.substring( lastEndIndex, tg.startIndex ), textModeNormal );
            }
            fragments.add( 
                    text.substring( tg.startIndex, tg.endIndex ),
                    tg.score > 0 ? textModeHighlighted : textModeNormal );
            lastEndIndex = tg.endIndex;
        }

        if ( lastEndIndex < ( text.length() - 1 ) ) {
            fragments.add( text.substring( lastEndIndex ), textModeNormal );
        }

        return fragments;
    }

    @Override
    public Iterator<TokenGroup> iterator() {
        return tgs.iterator();
    }
}

After further investigation, this appears to be a bug in the Lucene Highlighter code. As you can see here:

public class TokenGroup {

    ...

    protected boolean isDistinct() {
        return offsetAtt.startOffset() >= endOffset;
    }

    ...

The code attempts to determine if a group of tokens is distinct by checking to see if the start offset is greater than the previous end offset. The problem with this approach is illustrated by this issue. If you were to step through the tokens, you would see that they are as follows:

0-4: 'test', 'test'
5-6: '1', '1'
7-10: '500', '500'
5-10: '1500', '1,500'
11-15: 'this', 'this'

From this you can see that the third token starts after the end of the second, but the fourth starts the same place as the second. The intended outcome would be to group tokens 2, 3, and 4, but per this implementation, token 3 is seen as separate from 2, so 2 shows up by itself, then 3 and 4 get grouped leaving this outcome:

Expected: 'test <b>1,500</b> this'
Observed: 'test 1<b>1,500</b> this'

I'm not sure this can be accomplished without 2 passes, one to get all the indexes and a second to combine them. Also, I'm not sure what the implications would be outside of this specific case. Does anyone have any ideas here?

EDIT

Here is the final source code I came up with. It will group things correctly. It also appears to be MUCH simpler than the Lucene Highlighter implementation, but admittedly does not handle different levels of scoring as my application only needs a yes/no as to whether a fragment of text gets highlighted. Its also worth noting that I am using their QueryScorer to score the text fragments which does have the weakness of being Term oriented rather than Phrase oriented which means the search string "grammatical or spelling" would end up with highlighting that looks something like this "grammatical or spelling" as the or would most likely get dropped by your analyzer. Anyway, here is my source:

public TextFragments<E> getTextFragments( TokenStream tokenStream,
        String text,
        Scorer scorer )
        throws IOException, InvalidTokenOffsetsException {
    OffsetAttribute offsetAtt = (OffsetAttribute) tokenStream.addAttribute( OffsetAttribute.class );
    TermAttribute termAtt = (TermAttribute) tokenStream.addAttribute( TermAttribute.class );
    TokenStream newStream = scorer.init( tokenStream );
    if ( newStream != null ) {
        tokenStream = newStream;
    }

    TokenGroups tgs = new TokenGroups();
    scorer.startFragment( null );
    while ( tokenStream.incrementToken() ) {
        tgs.add( offsetAtt.startOffset(), offsetAtt.endOffset(), scorer.getTokenScore() );
        if ( log.isTraceEnabled() ) {
            log.trace( new StringBuilder()
                    .append( scorer.getTokenScore() )
                    .append( " " )
                    .append( offsetAtt.startOffset() )
                    .append( "-" )
                    .append( offsetAtt.endOffset() )
                    .append( ": '" )
                    .append( termAtt.term() )
                    .append( "', '" )
                    .append( text.substring( offsetAtt.startOffset(), offsetAtt.endOffset() ) )
                    .append( "'" )
                    .toString() );
        }
    }

    return tgs.fragment( text );
}

private class TokenGroup {
    private int startIndex;
    private int endIndex;
    private float score;

    public TokenGroup( int startIndex, int endIndex, float score ) {
        this.startIndex = startIndex;
        this.endIndex = endIndex;
        this.score = score;
    }
}

private class TokenGroups implements Iterable<TokenGroup> {
    private List<TokenGroup> tgs;

    public TokenGroups() {
        tgs = new ArrayList<TokenGroup>();
    }

    public void add( int startIndex, int endIndex, float score ) {
        add( new TokenGroup( startIndex, endIndex, score ) );
    }

    public void add( TokenGroup tg ) {
        for ( int i = tgs.size() - 1; i >= 0; i-- ) {
            if ( tg.startIndex < tgs.get( i ).endIndex ) {
                tg = merge( tg, tgs.remove( i ) );
            }
            else {
                break;
            }
        }
        tgs.add( tg );
    }

    private TokenGroup merge( TokenGroup tg1, TokenGroup tg2 ) {
        return new TokenGroup( Math.min( tg1.startIndex, tg2.startIndex ),
                Math.max( tg1.endIndex, tg2.endIndex ),
                Math.max( tg1.score, tg2.score ) );
    }

    private TextFragments<E> fragment( String text ) {
        TextFragments<E> fragments = new TextFragments<E>();

        int lastEndIndex = 0;
        for ( TokenGroup tg : this ) {
            if ( tg.startIndex > lastEndIndex ) {
                fragments.add( text.substring( lastEndIndex, tg.startIndex ), textModeNormal );
            }
            fragments.add( 
                    text.substring( tg.startIndex, tg.endIndex ),
                    tg.score > 0 ? textModeHighlighted : textModeNormal );
            lastEndIndex = tg.endIndex;
        }

        if ( lastEndIndex < ( text.length() - 1 ) ) {
            fragments.add( text.substring( lastEndIndex ), textModeNormal );
        }

        return fragments;
    }

    @Override
    public Iterator<TokenGroup> iterator() {
        return tgs.iterator();
    }
}
梨涡 2024-10-16 23:19:41

这是一个可能的原因。
您的荧光笔需要使用与搜索相同的分析器。 IIUC,您的代码使用默认分析器进行突出显示,即使它使用专门的分析器来解析查询。我相信您需要更改 Fragmenter 才能与您的特定 TokenStream 一起使用。

Here's a possible cause.
Your highlighter needs to use the same Analyzer used for search. IIUC, Your code uses a default analyzer for the highlighting, even though it uses a specialized analyzer for parsing the query. I believe you need to change the Fragmenter to work with your specific TokenStream.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文