将 null 分配给 SqlParameter

发布于 2024-10-09 18:18:57 字数 326 浏览 1 评论 0原文

以下代码给出错误 - “没有从 DBnull 到 int 的隐式转换。”

SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];    
SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);
planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex;
parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;

原文

The following code gives an error - "No implicit conversion from DBnull to int."

SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];    
SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);
planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex;
parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;

分享到QQ

分享到微博

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

需要登录才能够评论，你可以免费注册一个本站的账号。

寻梦旅人 2024-10-16 18:18:57

问题是 ?: 运算符无法确定返回类型，因为您返回的是 int 值或 DBNull 类型值，这两者不兼容。

当然，您可以将 AgeIndex 的实例转换为 object 类型，这将满足 ?: 要求。

您可以使用 ?? 空合并运算符，如下所示

SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];     
SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);
planIndexParameter.Value = (object)AgeItem.AgeIndex ?? DBNull.Value;
parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;

这是来自 MSDN 文档，用于解释问题的 ?: 运算符

first_expression 和 secondary_expression 的类型必须相同，或者必须存在从一种类型到另一种类型的隐式转换。

The problem is that the ?: operator cannot determine the return type because you are either returning an int value or a DBNull type value, which are not compatible.

You can of course cast the instance of AgeIndex to be type object which would satisfy the ?: requirement.

You can use the ?? null-coalescing operator as follows

SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];     
SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);
planIndexParameter.Value = (object)AgeItem.AgeIndex ?? DBNull.Value;
parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;

Here is a quote from the MSDN documentation for the ?: operator that explains the problem

Either the type of first_expression and second_expression must be the same, or an implicit conversion must exist from one type to the other.

回复收藏 0 原文

永言不败 2024-10-16 18:18:57

接受的答案建议使用强制转换。然而，大多数 SQL 类型都有一个特殊的 Null 字段，可用于避免这种转换。

例如，SqlInt32.Null“表示可以分配给 SqlInt32 类的此实例的 DBNull。”

int? example = null;
object exampleCast = (object) example ?? DBNull.Value;
object exampleNoCast = example ?? SqlInt32.Null;

The accepted answer suggests making use of a cast. However, most of the SQL types have a special Null field which can be used to avoid this cast.

For example, SqlInt32.Null "Represents a DBNull that can be assigned to this instance of the SqlInt32 class."

int? example = null;
object exampleCast = (object) example ?? DBNull.Value;
object exampleNoCast = example ?? SqlInt32.Null;

回复收藏 0 原文

凹づ凸ル 2024-10-16 18:18:57

您需要在 SQLCommand 中将 DBNull.Value 作为空参数传递，除非在存储过程中指定了默认值（如果您正在使用存储过程）。最好的方法是在执行查询之前为任何缺少的参数分配DBNull.Value，然后使用 foreach 即可完成这项工作。

foreach (SqlParameter parameter in sqlCmd.Parameters)
{
    if (parameter.Value == null)
    {
        parameter.Value = DBNull.Value;
    }
}

否则更改此行：

planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex;

如下：

if (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null)
    planIndexParameter.Value = DBNull.Value;
else
    planIndexParameter.Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex;

因为您不能在条件语句中使用不同类型的值，因为 DBNull 和 int 彼此不同。希望这会有所帮助。

You need pass DBNull.Value as a null parameter within SQLCommand, unless a default value is specified within stored procedure (if you are using stored procedure). The best approach is to assign DBNull.Value for any missing parameter before query execution, and following foreach will do the job.

foreach (SqlParameter parameter in sqlCmd.Parameters)
{
    if (parameter.Value == null)
    {
        parameter.Value = DBNull.Value;
    }
}

Otherwise change this line:

planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex;

As follows:

if (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null)
    planIndexParameter.Value = DBNull.Value;
else
    planIndexParameter.Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex;

Because you can't use different type of values in conditional statement, as DBNull and int are different from each other. Hope this will help.

回复收藏 0 原文

怀里藏娇 2024-10-16 18:18:57

使用一行代码，尝试以下操作：

var piParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", AgeItem.AgeIndex ?? (object)DBNull.Value);

With one line of code, try this:

var piParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", AgeItem.AgeIndex ?? (object)DBNull.Value);

回复收藏 0 原文

淡忘如思 2024-10-16 18:18:57

如果使用条件（三元）运算符，编译器需要在两种类型之间进行隐式转换，否则会出现异常。

因此，您可以通过将两者之一强制转换为 System.Object 来修复它：

planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : (object) AgeItem.AgeIndex;

但是由于结果并不是很漂亮，并且您始终必须记住此转换，因此您可以使用这样的扩展方法：

public static object GetDBNullOrValue<T>(this T val)
{
    bool isDbNull = true;
    Type t = typeof(T);

    if (Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(t) != null)
        isDbNull = EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(default(T), val);
    else if (t.IsValueType)
        isDbNull = false;
    else
        isDbNull = val == null;

    return isDbNull ? DBNull.Value : (object) val;
}

然后您可以使用这个简洁的代码：

planIndexParameter.Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex.GetDBNullOrValue();

If you use the conditional(ternary) operator the compiler needs an implicit conversion between both types, otherwise you get an exception.

So you could fix it by casting one of both to System.Object:

planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : (object) AgeItem.AgeIndex;

But since the result is not really pretty and you always have to remember this casting, you could use such an extension method instead:

public static object GetDBNullOrValue<T>(this T val)
{
    bool isDbNull = true;
    Type t = typeof(T);

    if (Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(t) != null)
        isDbNull = EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(default(T), val);
    else if (t.IsValueType)
        isDbNull = false;
    else
        isDbNull = val == null;

    return isDbNull ? DBNull.Value : (object) val;
}

Then you can use this concise code:

planIndexParameter.Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex.GetDBNullOrValue();

回复收藏 0 原文

征﹌骨岁月お 2024-10-16 18:18:57

试试这个：

SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];    
SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);

planIndexParameter.IsNullable = true; // Add this line

planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex== ;
parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;

Try this:

SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];    
SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);

planIndexParameter.IsNullable = true; // Add this line

planIndexParameter.Value = (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex== ;
parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;

回复收藏 0 原文

岁月如刀 2024-10-16 18:18:57

在我看来，更好的方法是使用 SqlCommand 类：

public static void AddCommandParameter(SqlCommand myCommand)
{
    myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue(
        "@AgeIndex",
        (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex);
}

In my opinion the better way is to do this with the Parameters property of the SqlCommand class:

public static void AddCommandParameter(SqlCommand myCommand)
{
    myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue(
        "@AgeIndex",
        (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null) ? DBNull.Value : AgeItem.AgeIndex);
}

回复收藏 0 原文

完美的未来在梦里 2024-10-16 18:18:57

你可以做这样的事情。这里 startDate 和 endDate 是可空日期时间参数

var Statistics= db.Database.SqlQuery<ViewStatistics>("YourStoreProcedure_Or_sqlQuery  @startDate,@endDate",
        new SqlParameter("startDate", startDate?? (object)DBNull.Value),
        new SqlParameter("endDate", endDate?? (object)DBNull.Value)
        ).ToList();

you can do something like this. Here startDate and endDate are nullable datetime param

var Statistics= db.Database.SqlQuery<ViewStatistics>("YourStoreProcedure_Or_sqlQuery  @startDate,@endDate",
        new SqlParameter("startDate", startDate?? (object)DBNull.Value),
        new SqlParameter("endDate", endDate?? (object)DBNull.Value)
        ).ToList();

回复收藏 0 原文

剩一世无双 2024-10-16 18:18:57

试试这个：

if (AgeItem.AgeIndex != null)
{
   SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];
   SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);
   planIndexParameter.Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex;
   parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;
}

换句话说，如果参数为空，则不要将其发送到存储过程（当然，假设存储过程接受问题中隐含的空参数）。

Try this:

if (AgeItem.AgeIndex != null)
{
   SqlParameter[] parameters = new SqlParameter[1];
   SqlParameter planIndexParameter = new SqlParameter("@AgeIndex", SqlDbType.Int);
   planIndexParameter.Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex;
   parameters[0] = planIndexParameter;
}

In other words, if the parameter is null just don't send it to your stored proc (assuming, of course, that the stored proc accepts null parameters which is implicit in your question).

回复收藏 0 原文

囚你心 2024-10-16 18:18:57

考虑使用可用的 Nullable(T) 结构。它只允许您设置值（如果有的话），并且您的 SQL Command 对象将识别可为空值并进行相应处理，而不会造成任何麻烦。

回复收藏 0 原文

你的往事 2024-10-16 18:18:57

if (_id_categoria_padre > 0)
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", SqlDbType.Int).Value = _id_categoria_padre;
}
else
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", DBNull.Value).Value = DBNull.Value;
}

if (_id_categoria_padre > 0)
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", SqlDbType.Int).Value = _id_categoria_padre;
}
else
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", DBNull.Value).Value = DBNull.Value;
}

回复收藏 0 原文

揽月 2024-10-16 18:18:57

一个简单的扩展方法是：

    public static void AddParameter(this SqlCommand sqlCommand, string parameterName, 
        SqlDbType sqlDbType, object item)
    {
        sqlCommand.Parameters.Add(parameterName, sqlDbType).Value = item ?? DBNull.Value;
    }

A simple extension method for this would be:

    public static void AddParameter(this SqlCommand sqlCommand, string parameterName, 
        SqlDbType sqlDbType, object item)
    {
        sqlCommand.Parameters.Add(parameterName, sqlDbType).Value = item ?? DBNull.Value;
    }

回复收藏 0 原文

小耗子 2024-10-16 18:18:57

我使用一个带有空检查的简单方法。

    public SqlParameter GetNullableParameter(string parameterName, object value)
    {
        if (value != null)
        {
            return new SqlParameter(parameterName, value);
        }
        else
        {
            return new SqlParameter(parameterName, DBNull.Value);
        }
    }

I use a simple method with a null check.

    public SqlParameter GetNullableParameter(string parameterName, object value)
    {
        if (value != null)
        {
            return new SqlParameter(parameterName, value);
        }
        else
        {
            return new SqlParameter(parameterName, DBNull.Value);
        }
    }

回复收藏 0 原文

相思故 2024-10-16 18:18:57

我的代码，在实际项目中工作
在创建sql参数之前先查看三元运算符
这对我来说是最好的方法，没有问题：

    public bool Key_AddExisting
    (
          string clave
        , int? idHito_FileServer
        , int? idTipoDocumental_Almacen
        , string tipoExp_CHJ
        , int idTipoExp_Verti2
        , int idMov_Verti2
    )
    {
        List<SqlParameter> pars = new List<SqlParameter>()
        {
              new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@Clave", Value = clave }
    LOOK -> , idHito_FileServer == null ? new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdHito_FileServer", Value = DBNull.Value } : new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdHito_FileServer", Value = idHito_FileServer }
    LOOK -> , idTipoDocumental_Almacen == null ? new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdTipoDocumental_Almacen", Value = DBNull.Value } : new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdTipoDocumental_Almacen", Value = idTipoDocumental_Almacen }
            , new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@TipoExp_CHJ", Value = tipoExp_CHJ }
            , new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdTipoExp_Verti2", Value = idTipoExp_Verti2 }
            , new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdMov_Verti2", Value = idMov_Verti2 }
        };

        string sql = "INSERT INTO [dbo].[Enlaces_ClavesCHJ_MovimientosVerti2] " +
            "( " +
            "  [Clave] " +
            ", [IdHito_FileServer] " +
            ", [IdTipoDocumental_Almacen] " +
            ", [TipoExp_CHJ] " +
            ", [IdTipoExp_Verti2] " +
            ", [IdMov_Verti2] " +
            ") " +
            "VALUES" +
            "( " +
            "  @Clave" +
            ", @IdHito_FileServer" +
            ", @IdTipoDocumental_Almacen" +
            ", @TipoExp_CHJ" +
            ", @IdTipoExp_Verti2" +
            ", @IdMov_Verti2" +
            ")";

        return DbBasic.ExecNonQuery(ref this.conn, sql, pars);
    }

My code, working in real project
Look the ternary operator beafore make the sqlparameter
this is the best way for me, withou problems:

    public bool Key_AddExisting
    (
          string clave
        , int? idHito_FileServer
        , int? idTipoDocumental_Almacen
        , string tipoExp_CHJ
        , int idTipoExp_Verti2
        , int idMov_Verti2
    )
    {
        List<SqlParameter> pars = new List<SqlParameter>()
        {
              new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@Clave", Value = clave }
    LOOK -> , idHito_FileServer == null ? new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdHito_FileServer", Value = DBNull.Value } : new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdHito_FileServer", Value = idHito_FileServer }
    LOOK -> , idTipoDocumental_Almacen == null ? new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdTipoDocumental_Almacen", Value = DBNull.Value } : new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdTipoDocumental_Almacen", Value = idTipoDocumental_Almacen }
            , new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@TipoExp_CHJ", Value = tipoExp_CHJ }
            , new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdTipoExp_Verti2", Value = idTipoExp_Verti2 }
            , new SqlParameter { ParameterName = "@IdMov_Verti2", Value = idMov_Verti2 }
        };

        string sql = "INSERT INTO [dbo].[Enlaces_ClavesCHJ_MovimientosVerti2] " +
            "( " +
            "  [Clave] " +
            ", [IdHito_FileServer] " +
            ", [IdTipoDocumental_Almacen] " +
            ", [TipoExp_CHJ] " +
            ", [IdTipoExp_Verti2] " +
            ", [IdMov_Verti2] " +
            ") " +
            "VALUES" +
            "( " +
            "  @Clave" +
            ", @IdHito_FileServer" +
            ", @IdTipoDocumental_Almacen" +
            ", @TipoExp_CHJ" +
            ", @IdTipoExp_Verti2" +
            ", @IdMov_Verti2" +
            ")";

        return DbBasic.ExecNonQuery(ref this.conn, sql, pars);
    }

回复收藏 0 原文

二货你真萌 2024-10-16 18:18:57

尝试这样的事情：

if (_id_categoria_padre > 0)
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", SqlDbType.Int).Value = _id_categoria_padre;
}
else
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", DBNull.Value).Value = DBNull.Value;
}

try something like this:

if (_id_categoria_padre > 0)
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", SqlDbType.Int).Value = _id_categoria_padre;
}
else
{
    objComando.Parameters.Add("id_categoria_padre", DBNull.Value).Value = DBNull.Value;
}

回复收藏 0 原文

勿挽旧人 2024-10-16 18:18:57

int? nullableValue = null;
object nullableValueDB
{
   get{
       if(nullableValue==null)
          return DBNull.Value;
       else
          return (int)nullableValue;
   }
}

我就是这样解决的

int? nullableValue = null;
object nullableValueDB
{
   get{
       if(nullableValue==null)
          return DBNull.Value;
       else
          return (int)nullableValue;
   }
}

I'm solving like that.

回复收藏 0 原文

作妖 2024-10-16 18:18:57

if (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null)  
    cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("ParaMeterName", SqlDbType.DateTime).Value = DBNull);  
else  
    cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("ParaMeterName", SqlDbType.DateTime).Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex);

if (AgeItem.AgeIndex== null)  
    cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("ParaMeterName", SqlDbType.DateTime).Value = DBNull);  
else  
    cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("ParaMeterName", SqlDbType.DateTime).Value = AgeItem.AgeIndex);

回复收藏 0 原文

灼疼热情 2024-10-16 18:18:57

这就是我简单做的事...

        var PhoneParam = new SqlParameter("@Phone", DBNull.Value);
        if (user.User_Info_Phone != null)
        {
            PhoneParam.SqlValue = user.User_Info_Phone;
        }

        return this.Database.SqlQuery<CustLogonDM>("UpdateUserInfo @UserName, @NameLast, @NameMiddle, @NameFirst, @Address, @City, @State, @PostalCode, @Phone",
            UserNameParam, NameLastParam, NameMiddleParam, NameFirstParam, AddressParam, CityParam, StateParam, PostalParam, PhoneParam).Single();

This is what I simply do...

        var PhoneParam = new SqlParameter("@Phone", DBNull.Value);
        if (user.User_Info_Phone != null)
        {
            PhoneParam.SqlValue = user.User_Info_Phone;
        }

        return this.Database.SqlQuery<CustLogonDM>("UpdateUserInfo @UserName, @NameLast, @NameMiddle, @NameFirst, @Address, @City, @State, @PostalCode, @Phone",
            UserNameParam, NameLastParam, NameMiddleParam, NameFirstParam, AddressParam, CityParam, StateParam, PostalParam, PhoneParam).Single();

回复收藏 0 原文

随风而去 2024-10-16 18:18:57

            dynamic psd = DBNull.Value;

            if (schedule.pushScheduleDate > DateTime.MinValue)
            {
                psd = schedule.pushScheduleDate;
            }


            sql.DBController.RunGeneralStoredProcedureNonQuery("SchedulePush",
                     new string[] { "@PushScheduleDate"},
                     new object[] { psd }, 10, "PushCenter");

            dynamic psd = DBNull.Value;

            if (schedule.pushScheduleDate > DateTime.MinValue)
            {
                psd = schedule.pushScheduleDate;
            }


            sql.DBController.RunGeneralStoredProcedureNonQuery("SchedulePush",
                     new string[] { "@PushScheduleDate"},
                     new object[] { psd }, 10, "PushCenter");

回复收藏 0 原文

揪着可爱 2024-10-16 18:18:57

sqlCom.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@qavCode", SqlDbType.Char, 11)).Value = (object)(string.IsNullOrEmpty(rf.Request.QavCode) ? null : rf.Request.QavCode) ?? DBNull.Value;

改进空合并运算符的使用 ??为了在我的示例中管理空字符串，我将常规三元 ?: 与空合并运算符 ?? 混合。希望我的建议有用。

sqlCom.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@qavCode", SqlDbType.Char, 11)).Value = (object)(string.IsNullOrEmpty(rf.Request.QavCode) ? null : rf.Request.QavCode) ?? DBNull.Value;

To improve the usage of the null-coalescing operator ?? to manage empty strings in my example I mixed the regular ternary ?: to the null-coalescing operator ??. Hope my suggestion is useful.

回复收藏 0 原文

~没有更多了~