android 复制保护 前向锁定 - 我应该不打扰吗？
我应该放弃 Android 应用程序的复制保护吗？它将很快被弃用，我最近注意到，由于这种复制保护，某些设备不会显示这些应用程序。一般来说，使用 SDK，您无论如何都可以轻松提取这些 apk，因此任何有知识的人都可以绕过此“安全性”。
我真的不想实现这个新的安全协议，因为它看起来可能会给用户在没有连接的情况下访问应用程序带来问题。一般来说，它看起来太复杂了。有人使用这种新的复制保护吗？
我的应用程序下载量不多，所以这不是很重要，谢谢
Should i abandon Copy protection for my android apps? It will be deprecated soon and I recently noticed that some devices will not show these apps due to this copy protection. Generally, with the SDK you can easily extract these apks anyway, so anyone with any knowledge can bypass this 'security'.
I really dont want to implement this new security protocol as it looks like it could cause problems for the user accessing apps without a connection. Generally it looks too complicated. Is anyone using this new copy protection?
My apps don't have many downloads so this is not super important, thanks
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
如果您指的是 Android Market 上的“复制保护”复选框，那么您绝对不应该使用它。正如您所指出的，它毫无意义，可能会导致问题，而且它正在被逐步淘汰。
虽然您可以设置策略来尝试减少这种情况，但最终，LVL 确实假设至少偶尔会连接回 Google 进行许可证验证。
我建议您不要担心版权保护，而是专注于不需要个人直接为应用程序付费的商业模式。
If you are referring to the "copy protection" checkbox on the Android Market, you most definitely should not use it. As you note, it is pointless and may cause problems, plus it is being phased out.
While you can set up policies to try to reduce this, in the end, LVL does assume at least occasional connections back to Google for license verification.
I would recommend you not worry about copy protection, and instead focus on business models that do not require you to be paid directly by individuals for apps.
如果您已经选择了此选项然后禁用它，是否会要求当前用户卸载该应用程序并最终丢失所有数据？
提供数据备份功能是理想的选择，但假设他们这样做是不可靠的。
If you have already opt-ed into this option and then disable it, wont current users be required to uninstall the application ultimately losing all their data?
Providing a data backup feature is ideal but assuming they are doing so isn't reliable.