CMS' are really good if you require ease of use, 'simple' customisability, or (in the case of wordpress) are constantly updating. Services such as eBay or Twitter wouldn't make sense on one of these platforms as there would be a lot of proprietary code in order to make there service work and be unique - this is what CMS' fall down on. You rely on people (or yourself) to build plugins to extend the original functionality. With a ground up website, you lose all the 'flab' (i.e. excess code and functionality that you may never use) and have a much more managable system.
Behind all the sites you mention would be some kind of in-house built CMS - it just wouldn't make sense for these companies to use publically available systems.
发布评论
评论（1）
如果您需要易用性、“简单”的可定制性，或者（在 WordPress 的情况下）不断更新，那么 CMS 非常好。 eBay 或 Twitter 等服务在这些平台上没有任何意义，因为需要大量专有代码才能使服务正常工作并保持独特性 - 这就是 CMS 失败的原因。您依靠人们（或您自己）来构建插件来扩展原始功能。有了一个全新的网站，您将失去所有“不稳定”（即您可能永远不会使用的多余代码和功能），并拥有一个更易于管理的系统。
您提到的所有网站背后都是某种内部构建的 CMS - 这些公司使用公开可用的系统是没有意义的。
CMS' are really good if you require ease of use, 'simple' customisability, or (in the case of wordpress) are constantly updating. Services such as eBay or Twitter wouldn't make sense on one of these platforms as there would be a lot of proprietary code in order to make there service work and be unique - this is what CMS' fall down on. You rely on people (or yourself) to build plugins to extend the original functionality. With a ground up website, you lose all the 'flab' (i.e. excess code and functionality that you may never use) and have a much more managable system.
Behind all the sites you mention would be some kind of in-house built CMS - it just wouldn't make sense for these companies to use publically available systems.