Amazon EC 或“标准”；用于网络托管的 VPS？
我正在寻找 Amazon EC 来建立一个小型 Linux 托管设置，最多可容纳十几个站点，我希望标准 PHP/MySQL 站点具有良好的性能。在考虑以下因素时，我想了解有关亚马逊服务性价比的意见：
- 响应速度/页面加载...
- 成本...
- 易于设置/维护......
与其他类似价格的 Linux VPS 托管相比设置。
我知道可扩展性是亚马逊的一大优势，但我对上述 3 个因素更感兴趣。
I'm looking at the Amazon EC for a small Linux hosting setup of up to a dozen site that I want decent performance for standard PHP/MySQL sites. I would like opinions about the value-for-money of Amazon's service when considering:
- speed of response/page load ...
- cost ...
- ease of setup/maintenance...
... in comparison to other similar priced Linux VPS hosting setups.
I understand scalability is a big bonus with Amazon, but I'm more interested in the above 3 factors.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
如果您需要按需、可扩展的基础设施，Amazon EC2/云是最相关的。您的分析似乎更像是“盒子里有什么”查询，这与 VPS 与 VPS 分析更相关。
但既然你问：
1）速度：这有点像问一段字符串有多长......你对IO、BW、服务器间通信等感兴趣吗？无论如何，使用 EC2，您只需为所需大小的盒子付费。因此，从理论上讲，设备物理速度的任何问题都可以通过购买更大的 EC2 硬件来缓解。
2) 成本：与项目编号 1 相关。需要一个非常大的盒子，每小时要支付几美元。实际上，我们仅使用“小型”盒子实例来运营一个相对较大的业务，这花费了我们大约 10 美分/小时。一般来说，EC2 的年度成本可能比固定期限的 VPS 租赁更高（这是有道理的，因为 EC2 是关于按需基础设施而不是固定基础设施）。
3) 设置： 我个人的观点是，第一次接触 EC2 可能是一个挑战。它还可能需要对安全性（pub/priv 密钥）和脚本编写有一定的了解。但一旦理解了，它实际上是一个非常易于使用和维护的基础设施。
实际上，我们最近有一组可能感兴趣的博客条目：
http://blog.labslice.com/2010/11/cloud-vs-vps-vs-shared-hosting.html
http://blog.labslice.com/2010 /11/when-is-cloud-suitable-for-basic.html
http://blog.labslice.com/2010 /11/why-your-business-really-needs-cloud.html
Amazon EC2 / cloud is mostly relevant if you need on-demand, scalable infrastructure. Your analysis seems to be more of a "what's in the box" query, which is more relevant to a VPS vs. VPS analysis.
But since you ask:
1) Speed: It's a bit like asking how long is a piece of string... Are you interested in IO, BW, inter-server comms etc.? Anyway, with EC2 you are paying for a box that's as large as you need. So in theory any problems with the physical speed of the box can be alleviated by just procuring larger EC2 hardware.
2) Cost: Linked to item number 1. Need a really big box and you'll be paying several dollars per hour. We actually run a relatively large business using only the 'Small' box instances, which cost us about 10 cents/hr. In general EC2 may have a higher annual cost than a fixed term VPS lease (which makes sense, cause EC2 is about on-demand infrastructure and not fixed infrastructure).
3) Setup: My personal opinion is that EC2 can be a challenge to get used to on first contact. It may also require some understand of security (pub/priv keys) and scripting. But once understood, it's actually a pretty neat infrastructure to use and maintain.
We actually had a recent set of blog entries that may be of interest:
http://blog.labslice.com/2010/11/cloud-vs-vps-vs-shared-hosting.html
http://blog.labslice.com/2010/11/when-is-cloud-suitable-for-basic.html
http://blog.labslice.com/2010/11/why-your-business-really-needs-cloud.html