CI：Automated Build Studio 对比 Hudson 对比 Atlassian Bamboo
可以支持 Windows、Linux 和 Macosx 跨平台、远程构建和部署且经济高效的最佳工具是什么？ 现在正在使用 Groovy(grails)、Java 和 .NET
谢谢
What would be the best tool to use that can support cross platforms, remote builds and deployment for windows, linux and macosx and cost effective?
Right now were using Groovy(grails), Java, and .NET
Thanks
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
您的要求相当模糊，因此期待模糊的答案。 Hudson 听起来像是一个合理的选择（跨平台、远程构建等），但你最好的选择是实际尝试一下！哈德逊拥有良好的社区和丰富的活动。阅读 wiki，搜索 邮件列表并在遇到困难时提出问题。
“成本效益”的要求对于外人来说几乎是不可能衡量的，因为我们不知道您愿意在构建和购买方面做出什么权衡，我们也不知道您的时间与金钱相比有多宝贵。
如果您想了解其他软件的概况，维基百科的持续集成软件比较可能会有所帮助。
Your requirements are pretty vague, so expect vague answers. Hudson sounds like it would be a reasonable fit (cross platform, remote builds, etc), but your best bet is to actually try it! Hudson has a good community and plenty of activity. Read the wiki, search the mailing lists and ask questions when you get stuck.
The "cost effective" requirement is nearly impossible for an outsider to measure because we have no idea what tradeoffs you're willing to make with build vs buy, nor do we know how valuable your time is compared to your money.
Wikipedia's Comparison of Continuous Integration software may be helpful if you want an overview of what else is out there.
我的公司使用竹子。我可以推荐它作为一个不错的产品。我还没有广泛使用 Hudson 来说它更好，尽管我有限的使用经验表明它至少同样好。
哈德森自由这一事实肯定是一个优点。
都尝试一下，看看您更喜欢哪一个。 Bamboo 有 30 天免费试用期。 链接
Bamboo 的一个缺点是我们拥有大量的 Bamboo计划的数量、计划的维护和创建都是由 Web GUI 驱动的。根据我的经验，自动化计划创建的空间很小。我相信 Hudson“计划”几乎可以通过命令行参数即时创建。
My company uses Bamboo. I can recommend it as a decent product. I have not used Hudson extensively enough to say that it's better, although my limited experience with it says that it is at least as good.
The fact Hudson is free has to be one plus for it.
Try them both out, and see which you like better. Bamboo has a 30 day free trial. link
One thing about Bamboo that has been a negative is that we have a huge number of plans, and plan maintenance and creation is all Web GUI driven. There is very little room to automate plan creation, from my experience. I believe Hudson "plans" can be created almost on the fly via command line arguments.