如何通过模糊匹配查找字符串中子字符串的位置

发布于 2024-10-06 02:35:50 字数 523 浏览 4 评论 0原文

我遇到过匹配 OCR 识别文本中的字符串并找到它的位置的问题,考虑到可以任意容忍错误、丢失或额外的字符。结果应该是最佳匹配位置,可能(不一定)具有匹配子字符串的长度。

例如:

String: 9912, 1.What is your name?
Substring: 1. What is your name?
Tolerance: 1
Result: match on character 7

String: Where is our caat if any?
Substring: your cat
Tolerance: 2
Result: match on character 10

String: Tolerance is t0o h1gh.
Substring: Tolerance is too high;
Tolerance: 1
Result: no match

我尝试采用 Levenstein 算法,但它对于子字符串不能正常工作,并且不返回位置。

Delphi 中的算法将是首选,但任何实现或伪逻辑都可以。

I have come across a problem of matching a string in an OCR recognized text and find the position of it considering there can be arbitrary tolerance of wrong, missing or extra characters. The result should be a best match position, possibly (not necessarily) with length of matching substring.

For example:

String: 9912, 1.What is your name?
Substring: 1. What is your name?
Tolerance: 1
Result: match on character 7

String: Where is our caat if any?
Substring: your cat
Tolerance: 2
Result: match on character 10

String: Tolerance is t0o h1gh.
Substring: Tolerance is too high;
Tolerance: 1
Result: no match

I have tried to adapt Levenstein algorithm, but it doesn't work properly for substrings and doesn't return position.

Algorithm in Delphi would be preferred, yet any implementation or pseudo logic would do.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

别低头,皇冠会掉 2024-10-13 02:35:50

这是一个有效的递归实现,但可能不够快。最坏的情况是找不到匹配项,并且“What”中除最后一个字符之外的所有字符都在“Where”中的每个索引处匹配。在这种情况下,算法将对 Where 中的每个字符进行 Length(What)-1 + Tolerance 比较,并对每个 Tolerance 进行一次递归调用。由于 Tolerance 和 What 的长度都是常量,所以我认为该算法是 O(n)。它的性能将随着“What”和“Where”的长度线性下降。

function BrouteFindFirst(What, Where:string; Tolerance:Integer; out AtIndex, OfLength:Integer):Boolean;
  var i:Integer;
      aLen:Integer;
      WhatLen, WhereLen:Integer;

    function BrouteCompare(wherePos, whatPos, Tolerance:Integer; out Len:Integer):Boolean;
    var aLen:Integer;
        aRecursiveLen:Integer;
    begin
      // Skip perfect match characters
      aLen := 0;
      while (whatPos <= WhatLen) and (wherePos <= WhereLen) and (What[whatPos] = Where[wherePos]) do
      begin
        Inc(aLen);
        Inc(wherePos);
        Inc(whatPos);
      end;
      // Did we find a match?
      if (whatPos > WhatLen) then
        begin
          Result := True;
          Len := aLen;
        end
      else if Tolerance = 0 then
        Result := False // No match and no more "wild cards"
      else
        begin
          // We'll make an recursive call to BrouteCompare, allowing for some tolerance in the string
          // matching algorithm.
          Dec(Tolerance); // use up one "wildcard"
          Inc(whatPos); // consider the current char matched
          if BrouteCompare(wherePos, whatPos, Tolerance, aRecursiveLen) then
            begin
              Len := aLen + aRecursiveLen;
              Result := True;
            end
          else if BrouteCompare(wherePos + 1, whatPos, Tolerance, aRecursiveLen) then
            begin
              Len := aLen + aRecursiveLen;
              Result := True;
            end
          else
            Result := False; // no luck!
        end;
    end;

  begin

    WhatLen := Length(What);
    WhereLen := Length(Where);

    for i:=1 to Length(Where) do
    begin
      if BrouteCompare(i, 1, Tolerance, aLen) then
      begin
        AtIndex := i;
        OfLength := aLen;
        Result := True;
        Exit;
      end;
    end;

    // No match found!
    Result := False;

  end;

我使用以下代码来测试该函数:

procedure TForm18.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var AtIndex, OfLength:Integer;
begin
  if BrouteFindFirst(Edit2.Text, Edit1.Text, ComboBox1.ItemIndex, AtIndex, OfLength) then
    Label3.Caption := 'Found @' + IntToStr(AtIndex) + ', of length ' + IntToStr(OfLength)
  else
    Label3.Caption := 'Not found';
end;

对于情况:

String: Where is our caat if any?
Substring: your cat
Tolerance: 2
Result: match on character 10

它显示了字符 9 的匹配,长度为 6。对于其他两个示例,它给出了预期结果。

Here's a recursive implementation that works, but might not be fast enough. The worst case scenario is when a match can't be found, and all but the last char in "What" gets matched at every index in Where. In that case the algorithm will make Length(What)-1 + Tolerance comparasions for each char in Where, plus one recursive call per Tolerance. Since both Tolerance and the length of What are constnats, I'd say the algorithm is O(n). It's performance will degrade linearly with the length of both "What" and "Where".

function BrouteFindFirst(What, Where:string; Tolerance:Integer; out AtIndex, OfLength:Integer):Boolean;
  var i:Integer;
      aLen:Integer;
      WhatLen, WhereLen:Integer;

    function BrouteCompare(wherePos, whatPos, Tolerance:Integer; out Len:Integer):Boolean;
    var aLen:Integer;
        aRecursiveLen:Integer;
    begin
      // Skip perfect match characters
      aLen := 0;
      while (whatPos <= WhatLen) and (wherePos <= WhereLen) and (What[whatPos] = Where[wherePos]) do
      begin
        Inc(aLen);
        Inc(wherePos);
        Inc(whatPos);
      end;
      // Did we find a match?
      if (whatPos > WhatLen) then
        begin
          Result := True;
          Len := aLen;
        end
      else if Tolerance = 0 then
        Result := False // No match and no more "wild cards"
      else
        begin
          // We'll make an recursive call to BrouteCompare, allowing for some tolerance in the string
          // matching algorithm.
          Dec(Tolerance); // use up one "wildcard"
          Inc(whatPos); // consider the current char matched
          if BrouteCompare(wherePos, whatPos, Tolerance, aRecursiveLen) then
            begin
              Len := aLen + aRecursiveLen;
              Result := True;
            end
          else if BrouteCompare(wherePos + 1, whatPos, Tolerance, aRecursiveLen) then
            begin
              Len := aLen + aRecursiveLen;
              Result := True;
            end
          else
            Result := False; // no luck!
        end;
    end;

  begin

    WhatLen := Length(What);
    WhereLen := Length(Where);

    for i:=1 to Length(Where) do
    begin
      if BrouteCompare(i, 1, Tolerance, aLen) then
      begin
        AtIndex := i;
        OfLength := aLen;
        Result := True;
        Exit;
      end;
    end;

    // No match found!
    Result := False;

  end;

I've used the following code to test the function:

procedure TForm18.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var AtIndex, OfLength:Integer;
begin
  if BrouteFindFirst(Edit2.Text, Edit1.Text, ComboBox1.ItemIndex, AtIndex, OfLength) then
    Label3.Caption := 'Found @' + IntToStr(AtIndex) + ', of length ' + IntToStr(OfLength)
  else
    Label3.Caption := 'Not found';
end;

For case:

String: Where is our caat if any?
Substring: your cat
Tolerance: 2
Result: match on character 10

it shows a match on character 9, of length 6. For the other two examples it gives the expected result.

最美不过初阳 2024-10-13 02:35:50

这是模糊匹配(近似搜索)的完整示例,您可以根据需要使用/更改算法!
https://github.com/alidehban/FuzzyMatch

Here is a complete sample of fuzzy match (approximate search), and you can use/change the algorithm as you wish!
https://github.com/alidehban/FuzzyMatch

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文