SharePoint 是正确的选择吗?

发布于 2024-10-05 20:34:42 字数 393 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我的(软件)公司有数百名客户。我们希望为每个客户提供一个类似 SkyDrive 的应用程序,用于在其员工或自己的客户之间共享文档和文件。该应用程序应该是一个 SaaS 应用程序,托管在我公司的服务器场上。

我们研究了 SharePoint 管理文档的方式,它或多或少正是我们所需要的;但我们有点害怕SP的重量和复杂性(高硬件要求,高能力要求,而且我们还没有谈论许可证!)。

此外,一位顾问告诉我们,选择SharePoint我们应该为每个客户创建一个SP实例(每个客户一个数据库)。

那么,问题是:SP 是正确的选择吗?哪些更简单、更容易的解决方案可以帮助我们实现目标?我们应该从头开始自己构建它吗?

更新:我忘了提到我们正在寻找一个 asp.net 解决方案,并且对于第三方应用程序,我们应该能够自定义代码。

My (software) company has hundreds of customers. We'd like to provide each customer with a SkyDrive-like application, something for sharing documents and files in general among their employees or their own customers. The application should be a SaaS one, hosted on my company's server farm.

We took a look to the way SharePoint manages documents, and it's more or less what we need; but we are a little scared by the weight and the complexity of SP (high hardware requirements, high competence required, and we haven't talked about licenses yet!).

Moreover, a consultant told us that choosing SharePoint we should create an instance of SP for each customer (one database for each).

So, the question is: can SP be the right choice? Which simpler and easier solutions can help us to reach the goal? Should we build it by ourselves from scratch?

Update: I forgot to mention that we're looking for an asp.net solution and, in case of third-part applications, we should be able to customize the code.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

少女情怀诗 2024-10-12 20:34:42

在您的情况下,我不会使用 SharePoint,主要是出于以下原因:

  • 存在许可成本。您仅使用 SharePoint 的一小部分。因此,您为正在使用的功能支付的价格很高。
  • 将 SharePoint 扩展到许多用户需要大量的能力,因为您没有任何其他 SP 安装,这将是昂贵的。

I would not use SharePoint in your case, mainly for these reasons:

  • There is a licencing cost. You are using only a small part or SharePoint. So the price you are paying for the functionality you are using is high.
  • Scaling SharePoint to many users requires a lot of competence, since you do not have any other SP installation this will be expensive.
翻身的咸鱼 2024-10-12 20:34:42

我在 Sharepoint 上的经验证实了您所担心的,即该产品本身就太大了。它至少将 3 个企业产品整合为一个。除非您需要它提供的更多功能,否则我不会这样做。

对于(自托管)文档共享,我会看看:

  • Confluence - Wiki,可以上传文档。企业级

如果您可以放宽要求以包含云托管解决方案,则还有更多可供选择:

  • Dropbox - 极其灵活地访问文档,并与您的计算机文件系统完美集成。每个 100 Gb 的成本仅为 20 美元,即使对于数百个客户来说也应该具有成本效益。
  • Google Documents - 与 Dropbox 类似,但具有网络界面。拥有品牌,因此您可以在自己的域中使用它,并转换 Office 文档,因此您无需下载它们即可更改它们。

希望您找到适合您需求的东西!

My experience with Sharepoint has confirmed what you fear, that the product is far to big for its own sake. It's at least 3 enterprise products rolled into one. I would not go that way unless you need more of the features it provides.

For (self-hosted) document sharing I would have a look at:

  • Confluence - Wiki with a possibility to upload documents. Enterprise grade

If you can loosen your requirements to include cloud-hosted solutions there's more to choose from:

  • Dropbox - Extremely flexible access to documents with great integration into your computers file-system. Each 100 Gb costs only $20 which should be cost-effective even for hundreds of customers.
  • Google Documents - Similar to Dropbox, but with a web interface instead. Has branding so you can use it on your own domain, and conversion of office documents so you don't have to download them to change them.

Hope you find something that fits your needs!

合约呢 2024-10-12 20:34:42

我同意 SharePoint 是一个更大的企业应用程序。

但是,您可以使用 WSS v 3 或 SharePoint Foundation 2010,它随 Windows Server 系列产品免费提供。您还可以使用 .NET 代码通过自定义功能来扩展它。

I agree SharePoint is a much bigger enterprise application.

However, you can go with WSS v 3 or SharePoint foundation 2010 which is free with Windows Server line of products. You can also extend it with custom functionality using .NET code.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文