什么比远程控制软件中的镜像驱动程序更快？
大多数远程桌面软件（例如 VNC 软件）都包含镜像驱动程序，这比轮询屏幕更改或使用系统挂钩要快得多。我只是想知道，有没有更快的替代方案？
Most remote desktop software, such as the VNC softwares, incorporate a mirror driver, which is magnitudes faster than polling for screen changes or using system hooks. I was just wondering though, is there a faster alternative?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
我已经做了一些测试，比较了 RealVNC enterprise（包括镜像驱动程序）和远程桌面，后者比带有镜像驱动程序的 RealVNC 要快得多。
根据我在测试 RealVNC 之前阅读的内容，我的印象是镜像驱动程序将创造几乎无延迟的体验，但我发现事实并非如此。远程桌面甚至允许您在查看远程桌面时显示完整的航空玻璃。
我已经在千兆位网络上完成了测试，两台计算机都通过以太网连接。
I've done some testing comparing RealVNC enterprise (which includes a mirror driver) and Remote Desktop and the later is significantly faster than RealVNC with the mirror driver.
From what I've read before testing RealVNC, I was under the impression that the mirror driver would create a almost lag-free experience, but that was not what I found. Remote Desktop even allows you to display the full aero glass when viewing the remote desktop.
I've done my testing on a Gigabit network, with both computers connected via Ethernet.