MyISAM 仅选择锁定过程内的插入
我们有一个大型 MyISAM 表,其中的行仅插入到表的底部。
在进行一些基准测试时,我意识到选择并不(总是)将其他插入锁定到同一个表。但是,当插入来自存储过程/函数时,它们将被选择锁定。
这是为什么?
要演示此行为:
CREATE TABLE Foo (
ID INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
Bar VARCHAR(200),
PRIMARY KEY(ID)) ENGINE=MyISAM;
--INSERT into Foo 10M rows
DELIMITER $$
DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS InsertProc$$
CREATE PROCEDURE InsertProc(IN vBar VARCHAR(255))
BEGIN
INSERT Foo(Bar) VALUES (vBar);
END$$
DELIMITER ;
运行以下查询:
SELECT Count(*) FROM Foo WHERE INSTR(Bar, 'abcdefg') > 0;
当该 Select 运行时,打开一个新连接并运行以下插入查询:
INSERT Foo(Bar) VALUES ('xyz1234');
该插入将立即运行并返回,但是如果我运行以下查询:
CALL InsertProc('xyz1234');
现在查询将锁定并等待以便选择完成。
MySql 版本:5.0.51 在 Window Server 2K3 上运行
谢谢。
- 更新 以下是配置文件输出:
直接插入:
(initialization) 0.0000432
checking permissions 0.0000074
Opening tables 0.0000077
System lock 0.0000032
Table lock 0.0000025
init 0.000021
update 0.0002365
end 0.0000382
query end 0.000002
freeing items 0.0000057
closing tables 0.0000022
logging slow query 0.0000005
通过过程插入:
(initialization) 0.0000285
Opening tables 0.0004325
System lock 0.0000022
Table lock 0.0002957
checking permissions 0.0000047
Opening tables 0.000004
System lock 0.0000017
Table lock 3.2365122
init 0.0000422
update 0.000251
end 0.0000025
query end 0.000003
closing tables 0.00004
query end 0.0000074
freeing items 0.0000074
logging slow query 0.000001
cleaning up 0.5790915
为什么过程会打开并“表锁定”两次?
We have a large MyISAM table to which rows get inserted to the bottom of the table only.
While doing some benchmarks, i realized that selects do not (always) lock other inserts to that same table. However, when the inserts are coming from a stored procedure/function they will by locked by the select.
Why is that?
To demonstrate this behavior:
CREATE TABLE Foo (
ID INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
Bar VARCHAR(200),
PRIMARY KEY(ID)) ENGINE=MyISAM;
--INSERT into Foo 10M rows
DELIMITER $
DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS InsertProc$
CREATE PROCEDURE InsertProc(IN vBar VARCHAR(255))
BEGIN
INSERT Foo(Bar) VALUES (vBar);
END$
DELIMITER ;
Run the following query:
SELECT Count(*) FROM Foo WHERE INSTR(Bar, 'abcdefg') > 0;
While that Select is running, open a new connection and run the following insert query:
INSERT Foo(Bar) VALUES ('xyz1234');
That Insert will run and return right away, However if i run the following query:
CALL InsertProc('xyz1234');
Now the query locks and waits for the select to complete.
MySql Version: 5.0.51 running on Window Server 2K3
Thank you.
-- UPDATE
Here is the profile output:
Insert Direct:
(initialization) 0.0000432
checking permissions 0.0000074
Opening tables 0.0000077
System lock 0.0000032
Table lock 0.0000025
init 0.000021
update 0.0002365
end 0.0000382
query end 0.000002
freeing items 0.0000057
closing tables 0.0000022
logging slow query 0.0000005
Insert via Procedure:
(initialization) 0.0000285
Opening tables 0.0004325
System lock 0.0000022
Table lock 0.0002957
checking permissions 0.0000047
Opening tables 0.000004
System lock 0.0000017
Table lock 3.2365122
init 0.0000422
update 0.000251
end 0.0000025
query end 0.000003
closing tables 0.00004
query end 0.0000074
freeing items 0.0000074
logging slow query 0.000001
cleaning up 0.5790915
Why does the procedure open and "Table lock" twice?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(3)
此问题作为错误提交:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=58689
This issue was submitted as a bug:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=58689
MyIASM 有什么特殊原因吗? InnoDB 表通常具有更好的锁定特性。
MyIASM for any particular reason? InnoDB tables usually have much better locking characteristics.
推测:当使用存储过程时,MyISAM 表上的
AUTO_INCRMENT
字段上的锁定/互斥处理可能会更严格。为了排除这种情况,您可以设置一个测试,其中
ID
不是AUTO_INCRMENT
字段吗?如果您的应用程序可能会尝试 INSERT DELAYED允许吗?
Speculation: perhaps the locking/mutex handling on the
AUTO_INCREMENT
field on MyISAM tables is stricter when stored procedures are used.To rule it out, could you set up a test where
ID
wasn't anAUTO_INCREMENT
field?Have you given INSERT DELAYED a try if you application might allow for it?