I wouldn't call it Guava for .NET - partly because a lot of the classes in Guava simply won't be needed. A lot of the Iterable stuff is covered by LINQ, for example, and much of the resource handling is simpler too.
I suggest that if you want to create a new .NET library, you target specific needs - Guava is a grab-bag of utilities which have proven useful in Java, but the needs of .NET developers are different.
发布评论
评论（1）
我不会将其称为 Guava for .NET - 部分原因是 Guava 中的许多类根本不需要。例如，许多
Iterable内容都由 LINQ 涵盖，并且许多资源处理也更简单。我建议，如果您想创建一个新的 .NET 库，请针对特定需求 - Guava 是一个工具包，已被证明在 Java 中很有用，但 .NET 开发人员的需求是不同的。
I wouldn't call it Guava for .NET - partly because a lot of the classes in Guava simply won't be needed. A lot of the
Iterablestuff is covered by LINQ, for example, and much of the resource handling is simpler too.I suggest that if you want to create a new .NET library, you target specific needs - Guava is a grab-bag of utilities which have proven useful in Java, but the needs of .NET developers are different.