当前位置： 文江博客话题详情

如何将动态对象传递到 NUnit TestCase 函数中？

发布于 2024-10-03 23:41:49 字数 2753 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我正在编写一个数据密集型应用程序。我有以下测试。它们有效，但相当多余。

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InMerchantAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals.ItemCount = 0;
    report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals._volume = 0;
    report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == 5461324658456716 && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}


[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    report.AggregateTotals.ItemCount = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals._volume = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}


[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotalsLineItem_SetsWarning()
{
    report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"].ItemCount = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"]._volume = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"]._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "WirelessPerItem").Count() > 0);
}

相同的属性在开始时被修改，就像不同容器对象的子对象一样，并且断言中的几个值在最后发生变化。

我需要编写其中的几十个，检查不同的属性。所以我想参数化测试。技巧是将容器对象作为参数传递给测试。容器对象在测试装置 SetUp 中实例化。

我想实现这样的目标：

[TestCase(report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"], 0, "WirelessPerItem")]
[TestCase(report.AggregateTotals, 4268435971532164, "AggregateTotals")]
[TestCase(report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals, 5461324658456716, "WirelessPerItem")]
[TestCase(report.Merchants[4268435971532164].LineItem["EBTPerItem"], 4268435971532164, "EBTPerItem")]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_TestCase_SetsWarning(object container, long mid, string field)
{
    container.ItemCount = 0;
    container._volume = 0;
    container._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == mid && x.lineitem == field).Count() > 0);
}

但这行不通，我不确定如何让它发挥作用，或者是否可能。

原文

I am writing a data-intensive application. I have the following tests. They work, but they're pretty redundant.

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InMerchantAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals.ItemCount = 0;
    report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals._volume = 0;
    report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == 5461324658456716 && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}


[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    report.AggregateTotals.ItemCount = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals._volume = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}


[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotalsLineItem_SetsWarning()
{
    report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"].ItemCount = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"]._volume = 0;
    report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"]._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "WirelessPerItem").Count() > 0);
}

The same properties are modified at the beginning, just as children of different container objects, and a couple of values in the assertion change at the end.

I need to write a few dozen of these, checking different properties. So I want to parameterize the test. The trick is passing the container object as a parameter to the test. The container object is instantiated in the test fixture SetUp.

I want to achieve something like this:

[TestCase(report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"], 0, "WirelessPerItem")]
[TestCase(report.AggregateTotals, 4268435971532164, "AggregateTotals")]
[TestCase(report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals, 5461324658456716, "WirelessPerItem")]
[TestCase(report.Merchants[4268435971532164].LineItem["EBTPerItem"], 4268435971532164, "EBTPerItem")]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_TestCase_SetsWarning(object container, long mid, string field)
{
    container.ItemCount = 0;
    container._volume = 0;
    container._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == mid && x.lineitem == field).Count() > 0);
}

But that doesn't work and I'm not sure how to make it work, or if it's possible.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论， 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论（5）

绝不放开 2024-10-10 23:41:49

我追踪到了它。我无法通过 TestCase 将实例化对象传递到测试中，因为属性严格适用于静态元数据。但 NUnit 团队对此有一个解决方案：TestCaseSource。 NUnit 列表上回答该问题的帖子是 此处。

这是我的解决方案现在的样子：

public static IEnumerable<TestCaseData> CountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreaterTestCases
{
    get
    {
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.Merchants[4268435971532164].LineItem["EBTPerItem"], 4268435971532164, "EBTPerItem").SetName("ReportMerchantsLineItem");
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals, 5461324658456716, "WirelessPerItem").SetName("ReportMerchantsAggregateTotals");
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.AggregateTotals, null, "AggregateTotals").SetName("ReportAggregateTotals");
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"], null, "WirelessPerItem").SetName("ReportAggregateTotalsLineItem");
    }
}


[TestCaseSource("CountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreaterTestCases")]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_TestCase_SetsWarning(Reports.ResidualsReport report, Reports.LineItemObject container, long? mid, string field)
{
    container.ItemCount = 0;
    container._volume = 0;
    container._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == mid && x.lineitem == field).Count() > 0);
}

它并不像我希望的那么漂亮，而且不那么容易阅读。但它确实成功地减少了代码重复，这应该使事情更容易维护和修复。

I tracked it down. I can't pass an instantiated object into a test via TestCase because attributes are strictly for static meta-data. But the NUnit team has a solution for that, TestCaseSource. The post on the NUnit list that answered the question is here.

Here is what my solution now looks like:

public static IEnumerable<TestCaseData> CountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreaterTestCases
{
    get
    {
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.Merchants[4268435971532164].LineItem["EBTPerItem"], 4268435971532164, "EBTPerItem").SetName("ReportMerchantsLineItem");
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals, 5461324658456716, "WirelessPerItem").SetName("ReportMerchantsAggregateTotals");
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.AggregateTotals, null, "AggregateTotals").SetName("ReportAggregateTotals");
        yield return new TestCaseData(report, report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"], null, "WirelessPerItem").SetName("ReportAggregateTotalsLineItem");
    }
}


[TestCaseSource("CountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreaterTestCases")]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_TestCase_SetsWarning(Reports.ResidualsReport report, Reports.LineItemObject container, long? mid, string field)
{
    container.ItemCount = 0;
    container._volume = 0;
    container._houseGross = 1;

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x=> x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == mid && x.lineitem == field).Count() > 0);
}

It is not as pretty as I hoped and is not as easy to read. But it did succeed on cutting down code duplication, which should make things easier to maintain and fix.

回复 原文
痴者 2024-10-10 23:41:49

我有时会传递我解析的字符串，我认为它读起来很好。

例子：

[TestCase("15°", "-10°", 25, typeof(Degrees))]
[TestCase("-10°", "15°", -25, typeof(Degrees))]
[TestCase("-10°", "0°", -10, typeof(Degrees))]
[TestCase("-90°", "1.5707 rad", -3.1414, typeof(Radians))]
[TestCase("1.5707 rad", "-90°", 3.1414, typeof(Radians))]
[TestCase("1.5707 rad", "1.5707 rad", 0, typeof(Radians))]
public void SubtractionTest(string lvs, string rvs, double ev, Type et)
{
    var lv = Angle.Parse(lvs);
    var rv = Angle.Parse(rvs);
    var diff = lv - rv;
    Assert.AreEqual(ev, diff.Value, 1e-3);
    Assert.AreEqual(et, diff.Unit.GetType());
}

I pass strings that I parse sometimes, and I think it reads pretty well.

Example:

[TestCase("15°", "-10°", 25, typeof(Degrees))]
[TestCase("-10°", "15°", -25, typeof(Degrees))]
[TestCase("-10°", "0°", -10, typeof(Degrees))]
[TestCase("-90°", "1.5707 rad", -3.1414, typeof(Radians))]
[TestCase("1.5707 rad", "-90°", 3.1414, typeof(Radians))]
[TestCase("1.5707 rad", "1.5707 rad", 0, typeof(Radians))]
public void SubtractionTest(string lvs, string rvs, double ev, Type et)
{
    var lv = Angle.Parse(lvs);
    var rv = Angle.Parse(rvs);
    var diff = lv - rv;
    Assert.AreEqual(ev, diff.Value, 1e-3);
    Assert.AreEqual(et, diff.Unit.GetType());
}
回复 原文
揽清风入怀 2024-10-10 23:41:49

我更喜欢遵循 ​​NUnit 文档 以避免引入魔法字符串。

链接中的第一个示例

public class BasicTestCaseSourceFixture
{
    [TestCaseSource(nameof(DivideCases))]
    public void DivideTest(int n, int d, int q)
    {
        Assert.AreEqual(q, n / d);
    }

    public static object[] DivideCases =
    {
        new object[] { 12, 3, 4 },
        new object[] { 12, 2, 6 },
        new object[] { 12, 4, 3 }
    };
}

I prefer to follow NUnit docs to avoid introducing magic strings.

First example from the link

public class BasicTestCaseSourceFixture
{
    [TestCaseSource(nameof(DivideCases))]
    public void DivideTest(int n, int d, int q)
    {
        Assert.AreEqual(q, n / d);
    }

    public static object[] DivideCases =
    {
        new object[] { 12, 3, 4 },
        new object[] { 12, 2, 6 },
        new object[] { 12, 4, 3 }
    };
}
回复 原文
橘虞初梦 2024-10-10 23:41:49

如果有一个私有方法、基类方法或帮助程序类来为您执行此操作会容易得多。

对于我的单元测试，我需要很多模拟实体，因为它是一个数据密集型应用程序。我创建了一个模拟存储库结构，可以动态创建初始化实体，我可以将其组合起来在内存中构建一个代表性的数据库结构。

类似的东西可能对你有用：

// Wild guess at the class name, but you get the idea
private void InitializeTotals(AggregateItem item)
{
    item.ItemCount = 0;
    item._volume = 0;
    item._houseGross = 1;
}

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InMerchantAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    InitializeTotals(report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals);

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x => x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == 5461324658456716 && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    InitializeTotals(report.AggregateTotals);

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x => x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotalsLineItem_SetsWarning()
{
    InitializeTotals(report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"]);

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x => x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "WirelessPerItem").Count() > 0);
}

It would be much much easier to have a private method, base class method, or helper classes that do this for you.

For my unit tests, I need many many mock entities because it's a very data-intensive application. I've created a structure of mock repositories that can create initialized entities on the fly, which I can combine to build up a representative database structure in memory.

Something like that could work for you:

// Wild guess at the class name, but you get the idea
private void InitializeTotals(AggregateItem item)
{
    item.ItemCount = 0;
    item._volume = 0;
    item._houseGross = 1;
}

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InMerchantAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    InitializeTotals(report.Merchants[5461324658456716].AggregateTotals);

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x => x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == 5461324658456716 && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotals_SetsWarning()
{
    InitializeTotals(report.AggregateTotals);

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x => x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "AggregateTotals").Count() > 0);
}

[Test]
public void DoSanityCheck_WithCountEqualsZeroAndHouseGrossIsGreater_InAggregateTotalsLineItem_SetsWarning()
{
    InitializeTotals(report.AggregateTotals.LineItem["WirelessPerItem"]);

    report.DoSanityCheck();

    Assert.IsTrue(report.FishyFlag);
    Assert.That(report.DataWarnings.Where(x => x is Reports.WarningObjects.ImbalancedVariables && x.mid == null && x.lineitem == "WirelessPerItem").Count() > 0);
}
回复 原文
节枝 2024-10-10 23:41:49
 [Test]
 [TestCase("textbox", true, "Text is empty", null, false)]
 [TestCase("textbox", false, "Text is empty", null, true)]
 public void Test_Component_Validation_and_ValidationText__Whether_IsMandatory_IsSet(string textbox, bool isMandatory, string validationText, string value, bool expectedValue)
 {
     // Arrange
     var mockPublicPortalService = new Mock<IPublicPortalService>();
     PublicAssessmentController controller = new PublicAssessmentController(mockPublicPortalService.Object);

     // Set Component properties
     var Component = new Component()
     {
         ComponentDatatype = textbox,
         IsMandatory = isMandatory,
         ValidationText = validationText,
         Value = value
     };

     var context = new ValidationContext(Component);

     // Act
     var results = new List<ValidationResult>();
     var isModelStateValid = Validator.TryValidateObject(Component, context, results, true);

     // Assert
     Assert.AreEqual(expectedValue, isModelStateValid);
     if (isModelStateValid == false)
     {
         Assert.IsTrue(results.Any(x => x.ErrorMessage == validationText));
     };
 }

 [Test]
 [TestCase("textbox", true, "Text is empty", null, false)]
 [TestCase("textbox", false, "Text is empty", null, true)]
 public void Test_Component_Validation_and_ValidationText__Whether_IsMandatory_IsSet(string textbox, bool isMandatory, string validationText, string value, bool expectedValue)
 {
     // Arrange
     var mockPublicPortalService = new Mock<IPublicPortalService>();
     PublicAssessmentController controller = new PublicAssessmentController(mockPublicPortalService.Object);

     // Set Component properties
     var Component = new Component()
     {
         ComponentDatatype = textbox,
         IsMandatory = isMandatory,
         ValidationText = validationText,
         Value = value
     };

     var context = new ValidationContext(Component);

     // Act
     var results = new List<ValidationResult>();
     var isModelStateValid = Validator.TryValidateObject(Component, context, results, true);

     // Assert
     Assert.AreEqual(expectedValue, isModelStateValid);
     if (isModelStateValid == false)
     {
         Assert.IsTrue(results.Any(x => x.ErrorMessage == validationText));
     };
 }
回复 原文
~没有更多了~

关于作者

紫竹語嫣☆

暂无简介

0 文章
0 评论
21 人气
发私信

相关话题

更多

热门标签

操作系统 程序设计 IT运维 Linux系统管理 JavaScript 服务器应用 solaris C/C++ PHP Shell BSD Vue.js aix Oracle Python HTML 系统管理 HTML5 CSS 前端
更多

推荐作者

1CH1MKgiKxn9p

文章 0 评论 0

ゞ记忆︶ㄣ

文章 0 评论 0

JackDx

文章 0 评论 0

信远

文章 0 评论 0

yaoduoduo1995

文章 0 评论 0

霞映澄塘

文章 0 评论 0

更多

友情链接

文江博客
    我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站，即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
    原文