数组的 RandomizedQuickSort 方法

发布于 2024-10-03 21:36:23 字数 71 浏览 0 评论 0原文

java API中有RandomizedQuickSort方法吗?或者我们应该自己编写它的代码? 谢谢

IS there RandomizedQuickSort method in java API? OR we should write its code ourselves?
thanks

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

甜柠檬 2024-10-10 21:36:23

除非您知道 Arrays.sort() 不会为您工作,否则我建议您使用它。否则,我建议您测试任何替代方案是否如其建议的那样好。

我将以下内容添加到 @org.life.java 建议的源代码中,以及 shuffle()/sort() 方法,这些方法应该是随机和快速排序的。

long runTimeNS = 2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000L;
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
    long start = System.nanoTime();
    long r;
    for (r = 1; r < runTimeNS; r++) {
        Arrays.sort(list7.clone());
        if (System.nanoTime() - start > runTimeNS) break;
    }
    long time = System.nanoTime() - start;
    System.out.println("Average Arrays.sort() time " + time / r / 1000 + " us.");

    long start1 = System.nanoTime();
    for (r = 1; r < runTimeNS; r++) {
        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
        for (int j : list7) list.add(j);
        Collections.shuffle(list);
        Collections.sort(list);
        int[] ints = new int[list.size()];
        for (int j = 0; j < list.size(); j++) ints[j] = list.get(j);
        if (System.nanoTime() - start1 > runTimeNS) break;
    }

    long time1 = System.nanoTime() - start1;
    System.out.println("Average shuffle/sort time " + time1 / r / 1000 + " us.");

    long start2 = System.nanoTime();
    for (r = 1; r < runTimeNS; r++) {
        qrsort(list7.clone());
        if (System.nanoTime() - start2 > runTimeNS) break;
    }

    long time2 = System.nanoTime() - start2;
    System.out.println("Average qrsort() time " + time2 / r / 1000 + " us.");
}

它打印

Average Arrays.sort() time 477 us.
Average shuffle/sort time 5964 us.
Average qrsort() time 36155 us.
Average Arrays.sort() time 474 us.
Average shuffle/sort time 5894 us.
Average qrsort() time 35078 us.
Average Arrays.sort() time 480 us.
Average shuffle/sort time 6211 us.
Average qrsort() time 34790 us.

Unless you know that Arrays.sort() is not going to work for you, I suggest you use that. Otherwise I suggest you test any alternative is as good as it suggests.

I added the following to the source suggested by @org.life.java as well as a shuffle()/sort() methods which should be both randomised and quicksorted.

long runTimeNS = 2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000L;
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
    long start = System.nanoTime();
    long r;
    for (r = 1; r < runTimeNS; r++) {
        Arrays.sort(list7.clone());
        if (System.nanoTime() - start > runTimeNS) break;
    }
    long time = System.nanoTime() - start;
    System.out.println("Average Arrays.sort() time " + time / r / 1000 + " us.");

    long start1 = System.nanoTime();
    for (r = 1; r < runTimeNS; r++) {
        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
        for (int j : list7) list.add(j);
        Collections.shuffle(list);
        Collections.sort(list);
        int[] ints = new int[list.size()];
        for (int j = 0; j < list.size(); j++) ints[j] = list.get(j);
        if (System.nanoTime() - start1 > runTimeNS) break;
    }

    long time1 = System.nanoTime() - start1;
    System.out.println("Average shuffle/sort time " + time1 / r / 1000 + " us.");

    long start2 = System.nanoTime();
    for (r = 1; r < runTimeNS; r++) {
        qrsort(list7.clone());
        if (System.nanoTime() - start2 > runTimeNS) break;
    }

    long time2 = System.nanoTime() - start2;
    System.out.println("Average qrsort() time " + time2 / r / 1000 + " us.");
}

and it prints

Average Arrays.sort() time 477 us.
Average shuffle/sort time 5964 us.
Average qrsort() time 36155 us.
Average Arrays.sort() time 474 us.
Average shuffle/sort time 5894 us.
Average qrsort() time 35078 us.
Average Arrays.sort() time 480 us.
Average shuffle/sort time 6211 us.
Average qrsort() time 34790 us.
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文