非阻塞线程安全内存池实现
我需要一个简单的非阻塞静态块大小内存池。我在网上没有找到这样的。所以每个人都需要这样的解决方案。这是免费的...仅适用于 Win32。
最好的问候,
弗里德里希
#ifndef MEMPOOL_HPP_INCLUDED
#define MEMPOOL_HPP_INCLUDED
#include "atomic.hpp"
#include "static_assert.hpp"
#pragma warning( push )
#pragma warning( disable : 4311 ) // warning C4311: 'Typumwandlung'
/// @brief Block-free memory-pool implemenation
/// @tparam T Object-type to be saved within the memory-pool.
/// @tparam S Capacy of the memory-pool.
template <typename T, int S>
class MemoryPool
{
private:
STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*), "Well, ...");
public:
/// @brief Object-type saved within the pool.
typedef T TYPE;
enum
{
/// @brief Capacy of the memory-pool.
SIZE = S
};
private:
/// @brief Chunks, that holds the memory
struct Chunk
{
/// @brief Single-linked list.
Chunk* Next;
/// @brief The value
/// We do not call the default constructor this way.
char Value[sizeof(TYPE)];
};
/// @brief The root object.
Chunk* Root;
/// @brief The pool
Chunk Pool[SIZE];
private:
// do not allow copying
MemoryPool(const MemoryPool&);
MemoryPool& operator=(const MemoryPool&);
void free(Chunk* c)
{
c->Next = Root;
while(!CompareAndSwap((int*)&Root, (int)c->Next, (int)c))
{
c->Next = Root;
}
}
public:
/// Default constructor
/// Creates an empty memory-pool.
/// Invalidates all the memory.
MemoryPool()
: Root(0)
{
for(int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
{
MemoryPool::free(&Pool[i]);
}
}
/// @brief Frees a chunk of memory, that was allocated by MemoryPool::malloc
/// @param _Chunk A chunk of memory, that was allocated by MemoryPool::malloc
/// This function will not call the destructor.
/// Thread-safe, non-blocking
void free(T* _Chunk)
{
if(!_Chunk)
return;
Chunk* c = (Chunk*)((int)(_Chunk) - sizeof(Chunk*));
if(c < &Pool[0] || c > &Pool[SIZE - 1])
return;
MemoryPool::free(c);
}
/// @brief Returns a pointer to a chunk of memory
/// @return 0 on a memory shortage
/// @return A pointer to a chunk of memory
/// This function will not call the constructor.
/// Thread-safe, non-blocking
T* malloc()
{
Chunk* r = Root;
if(!r)
return 0;
while(!CompareAndSwap((int*)&Root, (int)r, (int)r->Next))
{
r = Root;
if(!r)
return 0;
}
return &(r->Value);
}
};
#pragma warning( pop )
#endif // MEMPOOL_HPP_INCLUDED
和 CompareAndSwap
/// @brief Atomic compare and set
/// Atomically compare the value stored at *p with cmpval and if the
/// two values are equal, update the value of *p with newval. Returns
/// zero if the compare failed, nonzero otherwise.
/// @param p Pointer to the target
/// @param cmpval Value as we excpect it
/// @param newval New value
static inline int CompareAndSwap(volatile int *_ptr, int _old, int _new)
{
__asm {
mov eax, [_old] // place the value of _old to EAX
mov ecx, [_new] // place the value of _new to ECX
mov edx, [_ptr] // place the pointer of _ptr to EDX
lock cmpxchg [edx], ecx // cmpxchg old (EAX) and *ptr ([EDX])
}
return 1;
}
I needed a simple non-blocking static-block-size memory-pool. I didn't find such on the web. So everyone, who needs such a solution. This one is free... only works on Win32.
Best regards,
Friedrich
#ifndef MEMPOOL_HPP_INCLUDED
#define MEMPOOL_HPP_INCLUDED
#include "atomic.hpp"
#include "static_assert.hpp"
#pragma warning( push )
#pragma warning( disable : 4311 ) // warning C4311: 'Typumwandlung'
/// @brief Block-free memory-pool implemenation
/// @tparam T Object-type to be saved within the memory-pool.
/// @tparam S Capacy of the memory-pool.
template <typename T, int S>
class MemoryPool
{
private:
STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*), "Well, ...");
public:
/// @brief Object-type saved within the pool.
typedef T TYPE;
enum
{
/// @brief Capacy of the memory-pool.
SIZE = S
};
private:
/// @brief Chunks, that holds the memory
struct Chunk
{
/// @brief Single-linked list.
Chunk* Next;
/// @brief The value
/// We do not call the default constructor this way.
char Value[sizeof(TYPE)];
};
/// @brief The root object.
Chunk* Root;
/// @brief The pool
Chunk Pool[SIZE];
private:
// do not allow copying
MemoryPool(const MemoryPool&);
MemoryPool& operator=(const MemoryPool&);
void free(Chunk* c)
{
c->Next = Root;
while(!CompareAndSwap((int*)&Root, (int)c->Next, (int)c))
{
c->Next = Root;
}
}
public:
/// Default constructor
/// Creates an empty memory-pool.
/// Invalidates all the memory.
MemoryPool()
: Root(0)
{
for(int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
{
MemoryPool::free(&Pool[i]);
}
}
/// @brief Frees a chunk of memory, that was allocated by MemoryPool::malloc
/// @param _Chunk A chunk of memory, that was allocated by MemoryPool::malloc
/// This function will not call the destructor.
/// Thread-safe, non-blocking
void free(T* _Chunk)
{
if(!_Chunk)
return;
Chunk* c = (Chunk*)((int)(_Chunk) - sizeof(Chunk*));
if(c < &Pool[0] || c > &Pool[SIZE - 1])
return;
MemoryPool::free(c);
}
/// @brief Returns a pointer to a chunk of memory
/// @return 0 on a memory shortage
/// @return A pointer to a chunk of memory
/// This function will not call the constructor.
/// Thread-safe, non-blocking
T* malloc()
{
Chunk* r = Root;
if(!r)
return 0;
while(!CompareAndSwap((int*)&Root, (int)r, (int)r->Next))
{
r = Root;
if(!r)
return 0;
}
return &(r->Value);
}
};
#pragma warning( pop )
#endif // MEMPOOL_HPP_INCLUDED
And the CompareAndSwap
/// @brief Atomic compare and set
/// Atomically compare the value stored at *p with cmpval and if the
/// two values are equal, update the value of *p with newval. Returns
/// zero if the compare failed, nonzero otherwise.
/// @param p Pointer to the target
/// @param cmpval Value as we excpect it
/// @param newval New value
static inline int CompareAndSwap(volatile int *_ptr, int _old, int _new)
{
__asm {
mov eax, [_old] // place the value of _old to EAX
mov ecx, [_new] // place the value of _new to ECX
mov edx, [_ptr] // place the pointer of _ptr to EDX
lock cmpxchg [edx], ecx // cmpxchg old (EAX) and *ptr ([EDX])
}
return 1;
}
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
这种方法的问题在于
malloc
中存在竞争条件:考虑以下操作序列:
Root = A, A->next = B, ...
r = Root
,因此r = A
并且(进入寄存器)读取ecx = r->Next = B
malloc
和free
,使得A
使用一段时间并最后释放。Root = A, A->next = ZZZ, ...
cmpxchg
并成功,因为Root == r == A
并因此设置Root = ecx = B
如果您有双字
cmpxchg
,例如cmpxchg8b
,则可以解决此问题。您只需在列表头旁边添加一个序列号,这样如果您像上面 (3) 中那样被中断,比较就会失败。只要每个malloc
都交换指针并递增序列号,free
端就可以使用窄版本。The problem with this approach is that there is a race condition in
malloc
:Consider the following sequence of operations:
Root = A, A->next = B, ...
r = Root
sor = A
and (into a register) it readsecx = r->Next = B
malloc
andfree
occur such thatA
is used for a while and freed last.Root = A, A->next = ZZZ, ...
cmpxchg
and succeeds becauseRoot == r == A
and thus setsRoot = ecx = B
You can solve this problem if you have a double-word
cmpxchg
, such ascmpxchg8b
. You just include a serial number next to the list head so that if the compare fails if you are interrupted as in (3) above. Thefree
side can use the narrow version as long as eachmalloc
both exchanges the pointer and increments the serial number.感谢您的任何评论。该软件可与 WinXP 及更高版本一起使用。前面提到的实现仍然可以与 PowerPC 体系结构一起使用(如果您有 CompareAndSwap 的正确实现,请参阅“http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/aix/v6r1/topic/com.ibm.aix”。 aixassem/doc/alangref/stwcx.htm")。
最好的问候,
弗里德里希
Thank you for any comments. This one may be used with WinXP and newer. The implementation mentioned before may still be used with a PowerPC architecture (if you have a proper implementation of CompareAndSwap, see "http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/aix/v6r1/topic/com.ibm.aix.aixassem/doc/alangref/stwcx.htm").
Best regards,
Friedrich