利用 BackGroundWorker 在 Winforms 控件上跨线程调用 GUI 操作?

发布于 2024-10-03 01:05:44 字数 1365 浏览 2 评论 0原文

受到我自己使用多线程 Winforms 应用程序的经验以及诸如

我想出了一个非常简单的模式,我想验证其合理性。

基本上,我正在创建(并在应用程序的整个生命周期中运行)一个 BGW,其唯一目的是同步调用请求。考虑一下:

public MainForm()
{
    InitializeComponent();
    InitInvocationSyncWorker();
}

private void InitInvocationSyncWorker()
{
    InvocationSync_Worker.RunWorkerAsync();
}

private void InvocationSync_Worker_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
    Thread.Sleep(Timeout.Infinite);
}

void InvokeViaSyncWorker(Action guiAction)
{
    InvocationSync_Worker.ReportProgress(0, guiAction);
}

private void InvocationSync_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
    if (IsDisposed) return; //we're in the GUI thread now, so no race condition right?

    var action = (Action) e.UserState;
    action();
}

public void SomeMethodCalledFromAnyThread() //Sample usage
{
    InvokeViaSyncWorker(() => MyTextBox.Text = "Hello from another thread!"));    
}

当然,这不是最经济的方法(像这样保持线程存活),但如果它有效并且我没有错过任何东西,那么它肯定是我见过的最简单的方法。

非常感谢您的反馈!

Inspired by my own experience with multithreaded Winforms applications, as well as questions such as

I've come up with a very simple pattern, whose soundness I would like to verify.

Basically I'm creating (and running throughout the application's lifetime) a BGW whose sole purpose is the synchronization of invoke requests. Consider:

public MainForm()
{
    InitializeComponent();
    InitInvocationSyncWorker();
}

private void InitInvocationSyncWorker()
{
    InvocationSync_Worker.RunWorkerAsync();
}

private void InvocationSync_Worker_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
    Thread.Sleep(Timeout.Infinite);
}

void InvokeViaSyncWorker(Action guiAction)
{
    InvocationSync_Worker.ReportProgress(0, guiAction);
}

private void InvocationSync_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
    if (IsDisposed) return; //we're in the GUI thread now, so no race condition right?

    var action = (Action) e.UserState;
    action();
}

public void SomeMethodCalledFromAnyThread() //Sample usage
{
    InvokeViaSyncWorker(() => MyTextBox.Text = "Hello from another thread!"));    
}

Granted, it's not the most economical of approaches (keeping a thread alive like that), but if it works and I haven't missed anything, it sure is the simplest I've seen.

Feedback is highly appreciated !

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

转身泪倾城 2024-10-10 01:05:44

没有必要为此打开一个线程。只需使用 SynchronizationContext,如下所示:

private readonly SynchronizationContext _syncContext;

public MainForm()
{
    InitializeComponent();

    _syncContext = SynchronizationContext.Current;
}

void InvokeViaSyncContext(Action uiAction)
{
    _syncContext.Post(o =>
    {
        if (IsHandleCreated && !IsDisposed) uiAction();
    }, null);
}

public void SomeMethodCalledFromAnyThread() //Sample usage
{
    InvokeViaSyncContext(() => MyTextBox.Text = "Hello from another thread!"));    
}

There's no need to open a thread just for that. Simply use SynchronizationContext, like so:

private readonly SynchronizationContext _syncContext;

public MainForm()
{
    InitializeComponent();

    _syncContext = SynchronizationContext.Current;
}

void InvokeViaSyncContext(Action uiAction)
{
    _syncContext.Post(o =>
    {
        if (IsHandleCreated && !IsDisposed) uiAction();
    }, null);
}

public void SomeMethodCalledFromAnyThread() //Sample usage
{
    InvokeViaSyncContext(() => MyTextBox.Text = "Hello from another thread!"));    
}
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文