Erlang 丢失消息
我正在使用 dbg:p(client, r) 运行以下代码:
-module(client).
-export([start/0, start/2, send/1, net_client/1]).
start() ->
start("localhost", 7000).
start(Host, Port) ->
io:format("Client connecting to ~p:~p.~n", [Host, Port]),
register(ui, spawn(fun() -> gui_control([]) end)),
case gen_tcp:connect(Host, Port, [binary, {packet, 0}]) of
{ok, Socket} ->
Pid = spawn(client, net_client, [Socket]),
register(client, Pid),
gen_tcp:controlling_process(Socket, Pid);
Error ->
io:format("Error connecting to server: ~p~n", [Error]),
erlang:error("Could not connect to server.")
end,
ok.
send(Msg) ->
client!{send, Msg}.
%% Forwards messages to either the GUI controller or the server.
net_client(Socket) ->
receive
{tcp, Socket, Message} ->
Msg = binary_to_term(Message),
io:format("Received TCP message on ~p: ~p~n", [Socket, Msg]),
ui!{server, Msg};
{send, Message} ->
io:format("Sending ~p.~n", [Message]),
gen_tcp:send(Socket, term_to_binary(Message));
close ->
gen_tcp:close(Socket),
exit(normal);
{tcp_closed, Socket} ->
io:format("Server terminated connection.~n"),
exit(normal); %% Reconnect?
timeout -> %% This
io:format("Timed out?~n");
{inet_reply, Socket, Message} -> %% and this never happen.
io:format("inet_reply: ~p~n", Message);
Error ->
io:format("Net client got bad message: ~p.~n", [Error])
after 10000 ->
refresh %% gen_tcp:send(Socket, term_to_binary(keepalive))
end,
?MODULE:net_client(Socket).
gui_control(Data) ->
receive
%% This will hang the gui until the sync is done. Not sure if
%% that's okay.
{server, {sync, Datum}} -> % Resync command from server.
gui_control(resync([Datum]));
{client, refresh} -> % Refresh request from display.
display:update(Data);
{server, Msg} ->
io:format("UI Rx: ~p~n", [Msg])
end,
gui_control(Data).
resync(Data) ->
receive
{server, {sync, Datum}} ->
resync([Datum|Data]);
{server, {done, Num}} ->
case length(Data) of
Num ->
Data;
_ ->
io:format("Got done before all the data were received.~n"),
send({sync})
end
after 5000 ->
io:format("Timed out waiting for data.~n"),
send({sync})
end.
它与我使用 gen_tcp 和 gen_server 编写的服务器进行通信,遵循 这个。我的主要问题是我无法可靠地收到所有消息。有时我会从调试输出中得到
(<0.2.0>) << {tcp,#Port<0.517>,
<<131,104,6,100,0,4,99,97,114,100,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,
111,119,110,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,111,119,110,106,106,
104,3,107,0,6,83,101,99,111,110,100,100,0,4,100,114,97,
119,97,2,131,104,6,100,0,4,99,97,114,100,100,0,7,117,110,
107,110,111,119,110,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,111,119,110,
106,106,104,3,107,0,6,83,101,99,111,110,100,100,0,4,100,
114,97,119,97,3,131,104,6,100,0,4,99,97,114,100,100,0,7,
117,110,107,110,111,119,110,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,111,
119,110,106,106,104,3,107,0,5,70,105,114,115,116,100,0,4,
100,114,97,119,97,0>>}
,但没有相应的 Received TCP message on #Port<0.517>:...
消息。我还会看到类似这样的内容:
(<0.2.0>) << {io_reply,<0.24.0>,ok}
(<0.2.0>) << timeout
(<0.2.0>) << {io_reply,<0.24.0>,ok}
(<0.2.0>) << timeout
(<0.2.0>) << {io_reply,<0.24.0>,ok}
但是 net_client
的接收中没有任何内容。我用wireshark观察了网络流量,我知道数据包正在到达它们应该去的地方并被ACK
ed。我做错了什么?
编辑:我使用 erl -smp enable -eval "client:start()."
调用此函数,以防万一。
I'm running the following code with dbg:p(client, r)
:
-module(client).
-export([start/0, start/2, send/1, net_client/1]).
start() ->
start("localhost", 7000).
start(Host, Port) ->
io:format("Client connecting to ~p:~p.~n", [Host, Port]),
register(ui, spawn(fun() -> gui_control([]) end)),
case gen_tcp:connect(Host, Port, [binary, {packet, 0}]) of
{ok, Socket} ->
Pid = spawn(client, net_client, [Socket]),
register(client, Pid),
gen_tcp:controlling_process(Socket, Pid);
Error ->
io:format("Error connecting to server: ~p~n", [Error]),
erlang:error("Could not connect to server.")
end,
ok.
send(Msg) ->
client!{send, Msg}.
%% Forwards messages to either the GUI controller or the server.
net_client(Socket) ->
receive
{tcp, Socket, Message} ->
Msg = binary_to_term(Message),
io:format("Received TCP message on ~p: ~p~n", [Socket, Msg]),
ui!{server, Msg};
{send, Message} ->
io:format("Sending ~p.~n", [Message]),
gen_tcp:send(Socket, term_to_binary(Message));
close ->
gen_tcp:close(Socket),
exit(normal);
{tcp_closed, Socket} ->
io:format("Server terminated connection.~n"),
exit(normal); %% Reconnect?
timeout -> %% This
io:format("Timed out?~n");
{inet_reply, Socket, Message} -> %% and this never happen.
io:format("inet_reply: ~p~n", Message);
Error ->
io:format("Net client got bad message: ~p.~n", [Error])
after 10000 ->
refresh %% gen_tcp:send(Socket, term_to_binary(keepalive))
end,
?MODULE:net_client(Socket).
gui_control(Data) ->
receive
%% This will hang the gui until the sync is done. Not sure if
%% that's okay.
{server, {sync, Datum}} -> % Resync command from server.
gui_control(resync([Datum]));
{client, refresh} -> % Refresh request from display.
display:update(Data);
{server, Msg} ->
io:format("UI Rx: ~p~n", [Msg])
end,
gui_control(Data).
resync(Data) ->
receive
{server, {sync, Datum}} ->
resync([Datum|Data]);
{server, {done, Num}} ->
case length(Data) of
Num ->
Data;
_ ->
io:format("Got done before all the data were received.~n"),
send({sync})
end
after 5000 ->
io:format("Timed out waiting for data.~n"),
send({sync})
end.
It communicates with a server I wrote with gen_tcp and gen_server, following this. My main problem is that I don't reliably receive all my messages. Sometimes I'll get
(<0.2.0>) << {tcp,#Port<0.517>,
<<131,104,6,100,0,4,99,97,114,100,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,
111,119,110,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,111,119,110,106,106,
104,3,107,0,6,83,101,99,111,110,100,100,0,4,100,114,97,
119,97,2,131,104,6,100,0,4,99,97,114,100,100,0,7,117,110,
107,110,111,119,110,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,111,119,110,
106,106,104,3,107,0,6,83,101,99,111,110,100,100,0,4,100,
114,97,119,97,3,131,104,6,100,0,4,99,97,114,100,100,0,7,
117,110,107,110,111,119,110,100,0,7,117,110,107,110,111,
119,110,106,106,104,3,107,0,5,70,105,114,115,116,100,0,4,
100,114,97,119,97,0>>}
from the debugging output, but no corresponding Received TCP message on #Port<0.517>:...
message. I'll also see things like this:
(<0.2.0>) << {io_reply,<0.24.0>,ok}
(<0.2.0>) << timeout
(<0.2.0>) << {io_reply,<0.24.0>,ok}
(<0.2.0>) << timeout
(<0.2.0>) << {io_reply,<0.24.0>,ok}
but nothing from net_client
's receive. I've watched the network traffic with wireshark and I know the packets are getting where they're supposed to go and being ACK
ed. What am I doing wrong?
Edit: I'm invoking this with erl -smp enable -eval "client:start()."
in case it matters.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(3)
我想基本问题是“net_client”应该作为一个单独的进程产生。
在启动方法中,更改
为
应该可以解决它。
I guess the basic problem is that 'net_client' should be spawned off as a separate process..
In the start method, change
to
that should solve it..
另外,我建议使用 redbug(eper 的一部分)https://github.com/massemanet/eper追踪。它可以防止您的系统淹没在跟踪输出中,并提供极其简单的语法,例如:redbug:start("mymod:foo -> return", [{msgs,10}])。跟踪对 mymod:foo 的所有调用以及这些调用返回的内容,但给我的跟踪消息不超过 10 条。
Also, I recommend using redbug (part of eper) https://github.com/massemanet/eper when tracing. It protects you from drowning your system in trace output and provides a dead simple syntax, eg: redbug:start("mymod:foo -> return", [{msgs,10}]). trace all calls to mymod:foo and what those calls return but give me no more than 10 trace messages.
结果
{packet, 0}
是我的问题。将其替换为{packet, 2}
一切正常。Turns out
{packet, 0}
was my problem. Replace that with{packet, 2}
and all is well.