Rational Requisite Pro
我的公司想要使用 Rational Requisite Pro 来管理他们的需求文档，并且他们希望我提出一个计划。
我需要知道我可以从哪里开始这个过程？
My company wants to use Rational Requisite Pro to manage their requirement documents, and they want me to come up with a plan.
I need to know where can I go to start this process?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
我首先会问公司希望 Requisite Pro 为他们解决什么问题。通常情况下，公司会选择一种工具作为从根本上被破坏的流程的创可贴。如果一个组织不能解决真正的问题，那么他们最终只会花费大量资金，却得不到什么价值。
我的2分钱。
布兰登
I would start by asking what problem the company expects Requisite Pro to solve for them. More often than not companies select a tool as a band-aid for a process that's fundamentally broken to begin with. If an organization doesn't fix the real problem then they'll end up just spending a bunch of money and get little value out of it.
My 2 cents.
Brandon
听起来下载试用版并查看文档是一个不错的起点：
http: //www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/reqpro/
除非某个 eejit 经理已经做出了决定，否则我想知道对工具进行调查是否是一个好主意。有时开源工具可能比许可产品更好。例如，Subversion 毫无疑问地战胜了 Rational 源代码管理系统 ClearCase。也许这里也是如此。为了你自己和你的公司，你应该知道谁在这个领域处于领先地位以及有哪些开源替代方案：
http:// /sourceforge.net/projects/osrmt/
Sounds like downloading the trial and looking at the docs would be a good place to start:
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/reqpro/
Unless some eejit manager has already made the decision, I'd wonder if a survey of tools would be a good idea. Sometimes an open source tool can be better than a licensed product. For example, Subversion is the hands-down winner over ClearCase, the Rational source code management system. Perhaps that will be the case here as well. You owe it to yourself and your company to know who leads in this space and what open source alternatives there are:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/osrmt/