您只需使用WPF 对形状的绘图支持。这是一种非常有用、简单且强大的保留模式图形制作方法。
否则，GDI+ 通过 System.Drawing 命名空间公开框架，并且也相当易于使用。
这两个选项都很好，因为它们不需要额外的库 - 对此的支持直接存在于框架本身中。
You could just use WPF's Drawing support for shapes. This is an incredibly useful, easy, and powerful means of doing retained mode graphics.
Otherwise, GDI+ is exposed via the System.Drawing namespace in the Framework, and is fairly easy to use, as well.
Both of these options are nice in that they require no extra libraries - support for this exists direclty in the framework itself.
NShape - GPL。在测试版中。也许对您的使用来说有点过于复杂，但听起来它满足您的所有要求。商业用途199欧元，与竞争对手相比便宜。
NShape- GPL. In BETA. Maybe a bit too sophisticated for your use, but sounds like it meets all your requirements. 199EUR for commercial use, which is cheap compared to the competition.
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
暂无简介
文章 0 评论 0
接受
发布评论
评论（2）
您只需使用WPF 对形状的绘图支持。这是一种非常有用、简单且强大的保留模式图形制作方法。
否则，GDI+ 通过 System.Drawing 命名空间公开框架，并且也相当易于使用。
这两个选项都很好，因为它们不需要额外的库 - 对此的支持直接存在于框架本身中。
You could just use WPF's Drawing support for shapes. This is an incredibly useful, easy, and powerful means of doing retained mode graphics.
Otherwise, GDI+ is exposed via the System.Drawing namespace in the Framework, and is fairly easy to use, as well.
Both of these options are nice in that they require no extra libraries - support for this exists direclty in the framework itself.
NShape - GPL。在测试版中。也许对您的使用来说有点过于复杂，但听起来它满足您的所有要求。商业用途199欧元，与竞争对手相比便宜。
NShape- GPL. In BETA. Maybe a bit too sophisticated for your use, but sounds like it meets all your requirements. 199EUR for commercial use, which is cheap compared to the competition.