为什么这个 C 方法会出现段错误?
我正在用 C 语言编写一个不可变的链表类,但其中一种方法存在神秘的段错误。该代码大致相当于:
class PList(object):
def __init__(self, first, rest=None):
self.first = first
self.rest = rest
def cons(self, item):
return PList(item, self)
这是我的代码:
#include <Python.h>
#include <structmember.h>
static PyTypeObject PListType;
typedef struct PListStruct{
PyObject_HEAD
PyObject *first;
struct PListStruct *rest;
} PList;
static PyMemberDef plist_members[] = {
{"first", T_OBJECT_EX, offsetof(PList, first), READONLY, "First element"},
{"rest", T_OBJECT_EX, offsetof(PList, rest), READONLY, "Rest of the list"},
{NULL}
};
static PyObject *
PList_cons(PList *self, PyObject *arg)
{
PList *new_list = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(&PListType, arg, self);
Py_INCREF(new_list);
return new_list;
}
static PyMethodDef plist_methods[] = {
{"cons", (PyCFunction)PList_cons, METH_O, "Add an item to the list"},
{NULL}
};
static void PList_dealloc(PList *self)
{
Py_XDECREF(self->first);
Py_XDECREF(self->rest);
self->ob_type->tp_free((PyObject*)self);
}
static int
PList_init(PList *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
{
PyObject *first=NULL, *rest=NULL, *tmp;
static char *kwlist[] = {"first", "rest", NULL};
if (! PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "O|O", kwlist,
&first, &rest))
return -1;
if (first){
tmp = self->first;
Py_INCREF(first);
self->first = first;
Py_XDECREF(tmp);
}
if (rest) {
tmp = self->rest;
Py_INCREF(rest);
self->rest = rest;
Py_XDECREF(tmp);
}
else {
tmp = self->rest;
Py_INCREF(Py_None);
self->rest = Py_None;
Py_XDECREF(tmp);
}
return 0;
}
static PyTypeObject PListType= {
PyObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL)
0, /*ob_size*/
"pysistence.persistent_list.PList", /*tp_name*/
sizeof(PList), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
(destructor)PList_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/
0, /*tp_print*/
0, /*tp_getattr*/
0, /*tp_setattr*/
0, /*tp_compare*/
0, /*tp_repr*/
0, /*tp_as_number*/
0, /*tp_as_sequence*/
0, /*tp_as_mapping*/
0, /*tp_hash */
0, /*tp_call*/
0, /*tp_str*/
0, /*tp_getattro*/
0, /*tp_setattro*/
0, /*tp_as_buffer*/
Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT | Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE, /*tp_flags*/
"Persistent list", /* tp_doc */
0, /* tp_traverse */
0, /* tp_clear */
0, /* tp_richcompare */
0, /* tp_weaklistoffset */
0, /* tp_iter */
0, /* tp_iternext */
plist_methods, /* tp_methods */
plist_members, /* tp_members */
0, /* tp_getset */
0, /* tp_base */
0, /* tp_dict */
0, /* tp_descr_get */
0, /* tp_descr_set */
0, /* tp_dictoffset */
(initproc)PList_init, /* tp_init */
0, /* tp_alloc */
0, /* tp_new */
};
#ifndef PyMODINIT_FUNC
#define PyMODINIT_FUNC void
#endif
PyMODINIT_FUNC
initpersistent_list(void)
{
PyObject *m;
PListType.tp_new = PyType_GenericNew;
if (PyType_Ready(&PListType) < 0)
return;
m = Py_InitModule3("pysistence.persistent_list", 0,
"Docstring");
Py_INCREF(&PListType);
PyModule_AddObject(m, "PList", (PyObject*)&PListType);
}
如果我运行此代码,它会在最后一行出现段错误:
from pysistence.persistent_list import PList
p = PList(1)
p = PList(2, p)
p = p.cons(3)
我确信我只是在做一些愚蠢的事情,但我不明白它是什么。我有什么遗漏的吗?
I'm writing an immutable linked list class in C, but one method is mysteriously segfaulting. The code is intended to be roughly equivalent to this:
class PList(object):
def __init__(self, first, rest=None):
self.first = first
self.rest = rest
def cons(self, item):
return PList(item, self)
Here is my code:
#include <Python.h>
#include <structmember.h>
static PyTypeObject PListType;
typedef struct PListStruct{
PyObject_HEAD
PyObject *first;
struct PListStruct *rest;
} PList;
static PyMemberDef plist_members[] = {
{"first", T_OBJECT_EX, offsetof(PList, first), READONLY, "First element"},
{"rest", T_OBJECT_EX, offsetof(PList, rest), READONLY, "Rest of the list"},
{NULL}
};
static PyObject *
PList_cons(PList *self, PyObject *arg)
{
PList *new_list = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(&PListType, arg, self);
Py_INCREF(new_list);
return new_list;
}
static PyMethodDef plist_methods[] = {
{"cons", (PyCFunction)PList_cons, METH_O, "Add an item to the list"},
{NULL}
};
static void PList_dealloc(PList *self)
{
Py_XDECREF(self->first);
Py_XDECREF(self->rest);
self->ob_type->tp_free((PyObject*)self);
}
static int
PList_init(PList *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
{
PyObject *first=NULL, *rest=NULL, *tmp;
static char *kwlist[] = {"first", "rest", NULL};
if (! PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "O|O", kwlist,
&first, &rest))
return -1;
if (first){
tmp = self->first;
Py_INCREF(first);
self->first = first;
Py_XDECREF(tmp);
}
if (rest) {
tmp = self->rest;
Py_INCREF(rest);
self->rest = rest;
Py_XDECREF(tmp);
}
else {
tmp = self->rest;
Py_INCREF(Py_None);
self->rest = Py_None;
Py_XDECREF(tmp);
}
return 0;
}
static PyTypeObject PListType= {
PyObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL)
0, /*ob_size*/
"pysistence.persistent_list.PList", /*tp_name*/
sizeof(PList), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
(destructor)PList_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/
0, /*tp_print*/
0, /*tp_getattr*/
0, /*tp_setattr*/
0, /*tp_compare*/
0, /*tp_repr*/
0, /*tp_as_number*/
0, /*tp_as_sequence*/
0, /*tp_as_mapping*/
0, /*tp_hash */
0, /*tp_call*/
0, /*tp_str*/
0, /*tp_getattro*/
0, /*tp_setattro*/
0, /*tp_as_buffer*/
Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT | Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE, /*tp_flags*/
"Persistent list", /* tp_doc */
0, /* tp_traverse */
0, /* tp_clear */
0, /* tp_richcompare */
0, /* tp_weaklistoffset */
0, /* tp_iter */
0, /* tp_iternext */
plist_methods, /* tp_methods */
plist_members, /* tp_members */
0, /* tp_getset */
0, /* tp_base */
0, /* tp_dict */
0, /* tp_descr_get */
0, /* tp_descr_set */
0, /* tp_dictoffset */
(initproc)PList_init, /* tp_init */
0, /* tp_alloc */
0, /* tp_new */
};
#ifndef PyMODINIT_FUNC
#define PyMODINIT_FUNC void
#endif
PyMODINIT_FUNC
initpersistent_list(void)
{
PyObject *m;
PListType.tp_new = PyType_GenericNew;
if (PyType_Ready(&PListType) < 0)
return;
m = Py_InitModule3("pysistence.persistent_list", 0,
"Docstring");
Py_INCREF(&PListType);
PyModule_AddObject(m, "PList", (PyObject*)&PListType);
}
If I run this code, it segfaults on the last line:
from pysistence.persistent_list import PList
p = PList(1)
p = PList(2, p)
p = p.cons(3)
I'm sure I'm just doing something stupid, but I don't see what it is. Is there something I'm missing?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
我正在阅读文档:
使用可变数量的 PyObject* 参数调用可调用的 Python 对象。参数以可变数量的参数形式提供,后跟 NULL。成功时返回调用结果,失败时返回 NULL。
您缺少最后的 NULL 值。
编辑:Ho,您还想检查函数在内存故障时是否返回 NULL
I am reading from the documentation:
Call a callable Python object callable, with a variable number of PyObject* arguments. The arguments are provided as a variable number of parameters followed by NULL. Returns the result of the call on success, or NULL on failure.
You are missing the NULL value at the end.
Edit: Ho and you also want to check if the function returns NULL in case of memory failure