In my opinion, any project management tool could be adapted to your team and you should first choose what type of project management methodology you want to follow. Personally i think Kanban could be a good fit as there are no specific deadlines or cut off for projects, just tasks. It also allows you to prioritize tasks and carry out several projects at once.
This is the methodology we use and we do have similar uncertainties when it comes to the length of the projects. The tool we have been using is Eylean, it allows us to follow the methodology and have the updated status of the tasks at all times.
Any methodology can be scaled, provided you don't fall for the dogma and consider it to be the "Best" or "Only" way, or that you need to follow all the principles completely.
That said, I'm a big fan of Extreme Programming myself.
However, in practice, on our projects, we "officially " use a Waterfall methodology, but within each phase our methods are more in line with Agile methodologies, and our official stance is that each PM will use whatever tools he or she needs, so long as the project is moving along, we are meeting our deadlines, and most importantly, the customer is getting what they need when they expect it.
发布评论
评论（3）
在我看来，任何项目管理工具都可以适应您的团队，您应该首先选择您想要遵循的项目管理方法类型。就我个人而言，我认为看板可能很合适，因为项目没有具体的截止日期或截止日期，只有任务。它还允许您确定任务的优先级并同时执行多个项目。
这是我们使用的方法，在项目长度方面我们确实有类似的不确定性。我们一直使用的工具是 Eylean，它使我们能够遵循方法论并了解任何时候都有任务。
In my opinion, any project management tool could be adapted to your team and you should first choose what type of project management methodology you want to follow. Personally i think Kanban could be a good fit as there are no specific deadlines or cut off for projects, just tasks. It also allows you to prioritize tasks and carry out several projects at once.
This is the methodology we use and we do have similar uncertainties when it comes to the length of the projects. The tool we have been using is Eylean, it allows us to follow the methodology and have the updated status of the tasks at all times.
我是 Crystal Clear 的粉丝，这是 Cockburn 专注于小型团队工作的方法。 http://alistair.cockburn.us/Crystal+Clear+distilled
I'm a fan of Crystal Clear, which is Cockburn's method focused on smaller team work. http://alistair.cockburn.us/Crystal+Clear+distilled
任何方法都可以扩展，只要您不陷入教条并认为它是“最佳”或“唯一”方法，或者您需要完全遵循所有原则。
也就是说，我自己是极限编程的忠实粉丝。
然而，在实践中，在我们的项目中，我们“正式”使用瀑布方法，但在每个阶段我们的方法更符合敏捷方法，并且我们的官方立场是每个 PM 将使用他或她需要的任何工具，所以只要项目进展顺利，我们就能按时完成任务，最重要的是，客户会在他们期望的时候得到他们需要的东西。
Any methodology can be scaled, provided you don't fall for the dogma and consider it to be the "Best" or "Only" way, or that you need to follow all the principles completely.
That said, I'm a big fan of Extreme Programming myself.
However, in practice, on our projects, we "officially " use a Waterfall methodology, but within each phase our methods are more in line with Agile methodologies, and our official stance is that each PM will use whatever tools he or she needs, so long as the project is moving along, we are meeting our deadlines, and most importantly, the customer is getting what they need when they expect it.