正则表达式解析任意深度的函数
我正在为其中包含的函数解析一种简单的语言(Excel 公式)。函数名称必须以任意字母开头,后跟任意数量的字母/数字,并以左括号结尾(中间没有空格)。例如 MyFunc(
。该函数可以包含任何参数,包括其他函数,并且必须以右括号 )
结尾。当然,括号内的数学是允许的 =MyFunc((1+1))
并且 (1+1)
不应被检测为函数,因为它使函数失败我刚才描述的规则。我的目标是识别公式中最高级别的函数调用,识别函数名称,提取参数。通过参数,我可以递归地查找其他函数调用。
使用这个教程我破解了以下正则表达式。似乎没有人能做到这一点。他们都在下面粘贴的测试用例上失败了。
这应该可以工作,但完全失败:
(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9]*\()(?<body>(?>[a-z][a-z0-9]*\((?<DEPTH>)|\)(?<-DEPTH>)|.?)*(?(DEPTH)(?!)))\)
这对于许多测试用例都有效,但对于下面的测试用例失败。我不认为它正确处理嵌套函数 - 它只是在嵌套中查找开括号/闭括号:
(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9]*\()(?<body>(?>\((?<DEPTH>)|\)(?<-DEPTH>)|.?)*(?(DEPTH)(?!)))\)
这是打破它们的测试:
=Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1)-(Weekday(Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1))-1)+{0;1;2;3;4;5}*7+{1,2,3,4,5,6,7}-1
这应该匹配为:
Date(ARGUMENTS1)
Weekday(ARGUMENTS2)
Where ARGUMENTS2 = Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1)
相反,它匹配:
ARGUMENTS2 = Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1)-1)
我正在使用 .net RegEx 它提供了用于外部存储器。
I'm parsing a simple language (Excel formulas) for the functions contained within. A function name must start with any letter, followed by any number of letters/numbers, and ending with an open paren (no spaces in between). For example MyFunc(
. The function can contain any arguments, including other functions and must end with a close paren )
. Of course, math within parens is allowed =MyFunc((1+1))
and (1+1)
shouldn't be detected as a function because it fails the function rule I've just described. My goal is to recognize the highest level function calls in a formula, identify the function name, extract the arguments. With the arguments, I can recursively look for other function calls.
Using this tutorial I hacked up the following regexes. None seem to do the trick. They both fail on test case pasted below.
This should work but completely fails:
(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9]*\()(?<body>(?>[a-z][a-z0-9]*\((?<DEPTH>)|\)(?<-DEPTH>)|.?)*(?(DEPTH)(?!)))\)
This works for many test cases, but fails for test case below. I don't think it handles nested functions correctly- it just looks for open paren/close paren in the nesting:
(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9]*\()(?<body>(?>\((?<DEPTH>)|\)(?<-DEPTH>)|.?)*(?(DEPTH)(?!)))\)
Here's the test that breaks them all:
=Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1)-(Weekday(Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1))-1)+{0;1;2;3;4;5}*7+{1,2,3,4,5,6,7}-1
This should be matched as:
Date(ARGUMENTS1)
Weekday(ARGUMENTS2)
Where ARGUMENTS2 = Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1)
Instead it matches:
ARGUMENTS2 = Date(Year(A$5),Month(A$5),1)-1)
I am using .net RegEx which provides for external memory.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
这完全在 .NET 正则表达式的能力之内。这是一个有效的演示:
输出:
正则表达式的主要问题是您将函数名称作为递归匹配的一部分 - 例如:
任何前面没有名称的开放括号都不会被计算在内,因为它是与最终的替代方案
|.?
相匹配),这打破了右括号的平衡。这也意味着您无法匹配像=MyFunc((1+1))
这样的公式,您在文本中提到但未包含在示例中。 (我添加了一组额外的括号来演示。)编辑:这是支持非重要的、引用的括号的版本:
This is well within the capabilities of .NET regexes. Here's a working demo:
output:
The main problem with your regex was that you were including the function name as part of the recursive match--for example:
Any open-paren that wasn't preceded by name was not counted, because it was matched by the final alternative,
|.?
), and that threw off the balance with the close-parens. That also meant that you couldn't match formulas like=MyFunc((1+1))
, which you mentioned in the text but didn't include in the example. (I threw in an extra set of parens to demonstrate.)EDIT: Here's the version with support for non-significant, quoted parens: