MDX 查询中用户定义的层次结构

发布于 2024-09-28 09:58:00 字数 1334 浏览 3 评论 0原文

这个关于计算成员的问题之后,我有 2 个计算成员定义为:

MEMBER [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Derivatives]
AS
AGGREGATE(
    {
       [Asset].[Class].&[Fixed Income],
       [Asset].[Sub Class].&[Derivatives]
    },
    [Measures].CurrentMember
)
MEMBER [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Non-derivatives]
AS
AGGREGATE(
    {
      [Asset].[Class].&[Fixed Income],
      EXCEPT([Asset].[Sub Class].[Sub Class],[Asset].[Sub Class].&[Derivatives])
    },
    [Measures].CurrentMember
)

I可以在 MDX 查询中使用这些,如下所示:

SELECT
  {
   [Measures].[Market Value]
  } ON 0,
  NON EMPTY
  { 
   [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Derivatives],
   [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Non-derivatives]
   [Asset].[Class].[Class]
  } ON 1
  FROM [Asset]

这给出的输出如下:

Class-----------------------|-MarketValue
============================|=============
Fixed Income Derivatives    | 12345
Fixed Income Non-derivatives| 54321
Fixed Income                | 66666
Property                    | 123
Equity                      | 987

请注意,前 2 行实际上是第 3 行的组成部分。现在,我可以对读取此数据的客户端代码进行一些魔法,以将其转换为将表放入层次结构中,但是 - 这就是问题 - 我可以使用 MDX 来做到这一点吗?或者我只是让事情复杂化了?如果有必要的话,或者如果我可以在那里定义这个层次结构,我并不反对在多维数据集中进行更改。

Following on from this question regarding calculating a member I have 2 calculated members defined as:

MEMBER [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Derivatives]
AS
AGGREGATE(
    {
       [Asset].[Class].&[Fixed Income],
       [Asset].[Sub Class].&[Derivatives]
    },
    [Measures].CurrentMember
)
MEMBER [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Non-derivatives]
AS
AGGREGATE(
    {
      [Asset].[Class].&[Fixed Income],
      EXCEPT([Asset].[Sub Class].[Sub Class],[Asset].[Sub Class].&[Derivatives])
    },
    [Measures].CurrentMember
)

I can use these in an MDX query as follows:

SELECT
  {
   [Measures].[Market Value]
  } ON 0,
  NON EMPTY
  { 
   [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Derivatives],
   [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Non-derivatives]
   [Asset].[Class].[Class]
  } ON 1
  FROM [Asset]

And this gives me output as follows:

Class-----------------------|-MarketValue
============================|=============
Fixed Income Derivatives    | 12345
Fixed Income Non-derivatives| 54321
Fixed Income                | 66666
Property                    | 123
Equity                      | 987

Note that the first 2 rows are actually constituant parts of Row 3. Now, I can do some magic with the client code which reads this data to turn that table into a hierarchy, but - and here's the question - can I do it using MDX? Or am I just complicating things? Im not adverse to making changes in the cube if necessary, or if I could define this hierarchy there.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

爱给你人给你 2024-10-05 09:58:00

AFAIK,如果不使用客户端代码或更改多维数据集结构,则无法使用 MDX 获得客户端层次结构的结果。尽管您可以找到一种技巧来伪造客户的结果作为层次结构,但我不建议您这样做。

这是我的建议。
如果我理解正确,您想要得到一个不平衡的层次结构树的结果,如下所示。

[资产].[类别]

  • [固定收益]
    • [资产].[类别].[固定收益衍生品]
    • [资产].[类别].[固定收益非衍生品]
  • 财产
  • 权益

这种不平衡树只能通过父子层次结构来实现。

您可以尝试通过添加包含 PropertyEquity 成员的中间级别(或叶级别)来平衡层次结构,也可以创建父子层次结构以实现更深的级别不平衡的树。

编辑

这是一篇文章< /a> 关于父子维度。

AFAIK, you can't use MDX to get a result that is supposed as hierarchy at the client side without some magic with the client code or changing the cube structure. Even though you can find a trick to fake the client the result as an hierarchy i don't suggest you to go that way.

Here is my suggestion.
If i understand correctly, you want to get a result that is kind of an unbalanced hierarchy tree that looks like below.

[Asset].[Class]

  • [Fixed Income]
    • [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Derivatives]
    • [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income Non-Derivatives]
  • Property
  • Equity

This kind of unbalanced trees can only be implemented by parent-child hierarchies.

You can either try to balance the hierarchy by adding an intermediate level (or leaf levels) that includes Property and Equity members or create a parent-child hierarchy to achieve even deeper level unbalanced tree.

Edit

Here is an article about parent-child dimensions.

花想c 2024-10-05 09:58:00

我最终只返回类和子类,并在客户端代码中构建层次结构。

I ended up just returning both Class and Sub Class, and building the hierarchy in client code.

她比我温柔 2024-10-05 09:58:00

也许可以这样添加计算成员:

WITH MEMBER [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income].[Derivatives] AS ...

Perhaps adding the calculated member this way:

WITH MEMBER [Asset].[Class].[Fixed Income].[Derivatives] AS ...
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文