Dynamics CRM 与 Dynamics GP (Great Plains) 之间有哪些相同点或不同点

发布于 2024-09-27 15:08:00 字数 420 浏览 9 评论 0原文

我正在研究如何将产品集成到 Dynamics Great Plains 中。我以前使用过 Dynamics CRM,但没有使用过 Great Plains。我听说 GP 与 CRM 是不同的动物,尽管它们具有相同的“Dynamics”前缀,相似之处在哪里结束,差异又在哪里开始?

有人有过两者的经验吗?您能描述两者之间的一些相似之处和/或差异吗?在 GP 中我应该注意哪些注意事项、困难部分或痛点?

我对产品的入口点以及扩展用户界面的便捷性感兴趣。

当我使用 Dynamics CRM 时,我使用提供的 Web 服务作为应用程序的入口点。我读到 GP 也有某种 Web 服务,但我也读到它支持称为 eConnect 的东西(对我来说是新的)。

我在这里提出了很多问题,我并不是在寻找每个问题的具体答案,只是想让您思考我正在挖掘的信息类型。

谢谢!

I am doing research about integrating a product into Dynamics Great Plains. I have worked with Dynamics CRM before but not with Great Plains. I have heard that GP is a different animal than CRM, even though they share the same "Dynamics" prefix, where do the similarities end, and where do the differences begin?

Has anyone had any experience with both? Are you able to describe some similarities and/or differences between the two? Any caveats, difficult parts, or pain points I should be looking out for in GP ?

I am interested about the entrance points into the product, and ease of extending the user interface.

When I worked with Dynamics CRM, I used a provided Web Service as the entrance point into the application. I read that GP has some sort of web service too, but I've also read that it supports something called eConnect (new to me).

That's a lot of questions I put in here, I'm not looking for a specific answer for every single point, just wanted to get you thinking about the kind of information I am digging for.

Thanks!

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

感情废物 2024-10-04 15:08:01

以下是我在使用这两种产品时发现的情况:

  • 它们是非常不同的产品,是由 Microsoft 单独收购的。
  • CRM 使用 Web UI,GP 使用胖 Windows 客户端。
  • 两者都有 Web 服务 API,但您会发现 GP 的文档和示例要少得多。
  • GP 还有一个名为 eConnect 的 API,但 Web 服务 API 更容易使用。
  • CRM 定制使得扩展数据模型和用户界面变得非常容易。除非您需要使用 Javascript 的更复杂的 UI 功能,否则大多数情况下只需点击即可。
  • GP UI 称为 Dexterity,它支持自定义。但是,我没有任何这方面的经验。

Here is what I've found working with these two products:

  • They are very different products that were acquired by Microsoft in separate acquistions.
  • CRM uses a web UI, GP uses a fat windows client.
  • Both have web service APIs, but you'll find a lot less documentation and samples for GP.
  • GP also has an API called eConnect, but the web service API is a lot easier to work with.
  • CRM customizations make it pretty easy to extend both the data model and the user interface. It's mostly just point and click, unless you need more sophisticated UI functionality using Javascript.
  • The GP UI is called Dexterity which does support customizations. However, I've not had any experience with it.
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文