spring.net 是否正在积极维护/开发/记录？
在评估.net IoC框架的过程中，我首先尝试了spring.net，因为我非常喜欢java中的spring。然而，我很快就感觉到这是一个陈旧/停滞/死亡的项目。论坛几乎没有什么活动；该文档虽然冗长，但其自我引用、糟糕的示例和不完整的部分令人恼火； spring.net 问题在 stackoverflow 上似乎没有太大吸引力；谷歌搜索 spring.net 问题通常会导致页面记录一些模糊的场景。我即将跳转到 Ninja 或 Castle，但我可以看到他们的文档也不太出色。不过，如果每个人的文档都很差，我宁愿选择一个活跃的项目。您有什么建议？
In the course of evaluating .net IoC frameworks, I gave spring.net a try first, seeing as how much I liked spring in java. However, I'm rapidly getting the feeling that it is a stale/stalled/dead project. The forums have almost no activity; the documentation, though verbose, is infuriating with its self-referencing, poor examples, and incomplete sections; spring.net questions don't seem to get much traction on stackoverflow; and googling for spring.net issues usually leads to pages documenting somewhat obscure scenarios. I'm close to making the jump to Ninja or Castle, but I can see that their documentation doesn't exactly sparkle either. Still, if everyone has poor documentation, I'd rather pick an active project. What are your suggestions?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
Spring.NET 非常活跃。
看看他们的错误跟踪系统：
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPRNET
他们有 2 名全职提交者在它上面。
Spring.NET is pretty active.
Take a look to their bug tracking system :
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPRNET
They have 2 full-time committers working on it.
正如保罗所指出的，春天非常活跃。在我看来，他们的 IoC 容器非常棒。当我写这篇文章时，他们正在 github 上积极开发 code-config 项目 < /a>.
Spring is pretty active, as pointed out by Paul. Their IoC container is excellent, in my opinion. As I write this, they're actively working on a code-config project at github .