我应该买一本关于 LaTeX 和 MetaPost 的书,还是只买 MetaPost?
我感觉LaTeX语法还是蛮好用的。但是,我开始在我的文档中包含图表。我发现了 MetaPost 令人兴奋的世界!问题是,MetaPost 语法看起来比 LaTeX 更强烈一点……所以我想我应该买一本关于它的书。不过我想知道,是否应该购买一本同时讨论 LaTeX(也许我可以学到一些东西)和 MetaPost 的通用书籍,或者我应该购买一本专门讨论 MetaPost 的书?鉴于专业书籍会涉及更多内容,我认为介绍性的内容可能会更好。
如果相关,则该文档是软件项目规范;所以它包含 UML 和数据流图。老实说,我实际上想知道 LaTeX 是否与这个问题相关 - 如果是这样,是否有一本关于 MetaPost 的权威书籍?
Udpdate:
我刚刚意识到我无意中使用了 MetaUML,而不是原始的 MetaPost。对于那些不知道的人来说,MetaUML 是 MetaPost 的一个包。正如用户 Little Bobby Tables 所指出的,没有关于 MetaUML 的书。
I feel that the LaTeX syntax is quite easy to use. However, I'm starting to include diagrams in my document. I've discovered the exciting world of MetaPost! The thing is, the MetaPost syntax looks a little more intense than LaTeX... So I figured I'd buy a book on it. I'm wondering though, whether it's better to buy a generalised book that talks about both LaTeX (maybe I can learn something) and MetaPost, or should I buy a book that specialises on only MetaPost? Given that the specialised book is going to be more involved, I'm thinking something introductory might be better.
If it's relevant, the document is a software project specification; so it contains UML and data flow diagrams. To be honest, I'm actually wondering if LaTeX is relevant to this question -- if this is the case, is there a definitive book for MetaPost?
Udpdate:
I just realised that I was unwittingly using MetaUML, not raw MetaPost. So for those that don't know, MetaUML is a package for MetaPost. As user Little Bobby Tables has pointed out, there is no book for MetaUML.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)