还有哪些其他与 RealBasic 类似的产品？
我正在寻找可以为 Mac 和 Windows 创建应用程序的东西。 RealBasic 似乎还可以创建内置某种 SQLLite DB 的应用程序。这对于需要保存状态/数据的独立应用程序来说非常有用。
我有 Flash，它可以为 Mac 和 Windows 创建可执行文件，但它没有简单的数据库打包或集成。
还有哪些类似 RealBasic 的其他类似产品？
I'm looking to get something that can create apps for Mac and Windows. It also seems that RealBasic can also create applications that have some sort of SQLLite DB built in. This is nice for standalone apps that need to save state/data.
I have Flash, which can create executables for Mac and Windows, but it doesn't have the easy database packaging or integration.
What are some other comparable products like RealBasic?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（4）
您可以查看 LiveCode
我没有任何使用它的经验，但是它还声称支持跨 Mac / Windows / Linux 等的跨平台应用程序开发
另外，我认为这个产品曾经被称为“Revolution”，所以它已经存在至少几年了 - Revolution 自 2001 年之前就已经存在据我所知
You can check out LiveCode
I do not have any experience using it but it also claims to support cross platform application development across Mac / Windows / Linux etc
Also, i think this product is what used to be called "Revolution" so it has been around atleast for a few years now - Revolution has been around since before 2001 to the best of my knowledge
使用 Java 的主要问题是 UI 不具有其运行平台的本机外观和感觉。有时这并不重要。但我发现对于大多数最终用户来说，用户界面是一件大事。
与上面的答案相反，RealBasic 从未使用过“解释运行时”。它被编译为机器代码并链接到运行时。如今，它首先被编译成 LLVM 指令，然后再编译成机器代码。所以它肯定比Java更快。它的主要弱点似乎是任何基于 Basic 的语言都带有耻辱。
The main problem with using Java is that the UI won't have the native look and feel of the platform it's running on. Sometimes that won't matter. But I've found that for most endusers the UI is a big deal.
Contrary to the above answer, RealBasic has never used an "interpreted runtime". It's compiled to machine code and linked to the runtime. These days it's compiled into LLVM instructions first before being compiled into machine code. So it's definitely faster than Java. It's main weakness seems to be the stigma attached to any language based on Basic.
由于 RealBasic 的跨平台功能，我使用了很多年。长期以来，RealBasic 一直是唯一真正管理这两个世界的产品。
在 OS X 10.4 中，JAVA 成为 RealBasic 的真正替代品。 JAVA 在 Windows 上运行良好好几年了，随着 10.4 的出现，它现在在 OS X 上也运行良好了。
JAVA 的唯一缺点是：您需要在目标系统上有 JRE（OS X 总是有，Windows 通常有但不总是）——这是 JAVA 唯一的坏处。 RealBasic 也“只是一个解释运行时” - 但它在二进制文件中带来了运行时，另一方面，如果将它们与 VB-项目。
在 10.4 中，我决定改用 JAVA 进行跨平台开发，从我今天的角度来看，这是我能做出的最佳决定。
I was using RealBasic for many years, due to its cross-platform capabilities. RealBasic was very long the only product that really managed both worlds.
With OS X 10.4 JAVA became a real alternative for RealBasic. On Windows JAVA was running well for several years, and with 10.4 it was also running well on OS X now.
The only thing with JAVA is: You need to have a JRE on the target system (OS X always has, Windows usually has but not always) - that is the only bad thing about JAVA. RealBasic is also "only an Interpreted runtime" - but it brings it's runtime in the binary, what on the other hand makes RealBasic .exe really huge if you compare them to a VB-project.
With 10.4 I decided to change to JAVA for Crossplatform-Development and from my point of view today, it was the best decission I could make.
您可以尝试
使用 Web 服务（php、coldfusion、java、asp.net 等）使用 Adobe Flex（现为 Apache Flex）Flex for Web Apps（RIA 应用程序）
AIR 桌面版（Windows、Mac）
AIR for mobile（Android、iOS、BlackBerry）
如果您使用 AIR，那么您需要安装 AIR 运行时
抱歉我的英语不好
You can try with Adobe Flex (now Apache Flex)
Flex for Web Apps (RIA apps) using web services (php, coldfusion, java, asp.net, etc)
AIR for Desktop (Windows, Mac)
AIR for mobile (Android, iOS, BlackBerry)
if you use AIR, then you need install AIR runtime
sorry for my bad english