空载燕子死了吗？
我的项目将 C++ 与 Python 集成的解决方案推迟到现在。但现在这个问题又被提出来了。 有人知道项目进展吗？在谷歌上：（http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow）根本没有实际信息。我们可以考虑这个项目吗？
My project has deferred solution on integration C++ with Python until now. But now this question is raised again.
Do anybody know status of project? On Google: (http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow) there is no actual info at all. Can we reckon on this project?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
Unladen Swallow 已经死了，因为活跃度很低，而且成为像 Jython 或 Ironpython 这样的独立 Unladen Swallow 分支的希望不大。
也就是说，许多优化和进步将被合并到 CPython 中。而且，还是希望 Unladen Swallow 团队能继续优化，如 PEP 3003 旨在允许 Python 的其他分支（即 IronPython 和 Jython，但也包括 Unladen）赶上 C 实现。
但不，你不能指望Unladen Swallow。在不久的将来，它不太可能独立站立，或者很可能永远不会。您可能需要找到另一种 C++ 与 Python 集成的解决方案（CPython 并不那么慢，所以也许可以尝试一下？）
Unladen Swallow is dead in the sense that activity is low and there seems little hope of being a standalone Unladen Swallow branch like Jython or Ironpython.
That said, a lot of the optimizations and advances are going to get merged into CPython. Moreover, there is still hope that the Unladen Swallow team will continue to make their optimizations, as PEP 3003 is designed to allow other branches of Python (namely IronPython and Jython but Unladen too) catch up with the C implementation.
But no, you can't reckon on Unladen Swallow. It's unlikely it will ever stand on its own two feet in the near future or, most likely, ever. You may need to find another solution for C++ integration with Python (CPython isn't that slow, so maybe try it?)
距离提出这个问题已经过去五个月了，Reid Kleckner 发布了他自己的 回顾。虽然他没有被列为所有者，但他的大部分观察表明 Unladen Swallow 很可能已经完成。
It is now five months since this question was asked, and Reid Kleckner has posted his own retrospective on Unladen Swallow. While he isn't listed as owner, most of his observations make it likely that Unladen Swallow is finished.