任意数字行的几何级数

发布于 2024-09-25 14:33:45 字数 381 浏览 5 评论 0原文

我可以拥有由 2 到 10 个数字组成的任何数字行。从这一行开始,我必须得到几何级数。

例如: 给定数字行:125 5 625 我必须得到答案5。行:128 8 512 我必须得到答案4

你能帮我个忙吗?我不求程序,只求一个提示,我想自己理解,自己写一段代码,但是妈的,我想了一整天,也想不出来。

谢谢。

不要写整个程序!

伙计们,你们不明白,我不能简单地进行除法。我实际上必须得到几何级数+显示所有数字。在 128 8 512 行中,所有数字均为:8 32 128 512

I can have any number row which consists from 2 to 10 numbers. And from this row, I have to get geometrical progression.

For example:
Given number row: 125 5 625 I have to get answer 5. Row: 128 8 512 I have to get answer 4.

Can you give me a hand? I don't ask for a program, just a hint, I want to understand it by myself and write a code by myself, but damn, I have been thinking the whole day and couldn't figure this out.

Thank you.

DON'T WRITE THE WHOLE PROGRAM!

Guys, you don't get it, I can't just simple make a division. I actually have to get geometrical progression + show all numbers. In 128 8 512 row all numbers would be: 8 32 128 512

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(5

方觉久 2024-10-02 14:33:45

赛斯的答案是正确的。我将这个答案留在这里是为了帮助详细说明为什么 128 8 512 的答案是 4,因为人们似乎对此遇到了麻烦。


等比级数的元素可以写成 c*b^n 的形式,其中 b 是您要查找的数字(b 也是必然大于 1),c 是一个常数,n 是某个任意数字。

因此,最好的选择是从最小的数字开始,将其分解并查看所有可能的解决方案,将其写入 c*b^n 形式,然后使用该 b关于剩余的数字。返回有效的最大结果。

因此,对于您的示例:

125 5 625

从 5 开始。5 是质数,因此只能用一种方式编写:5 = 1*5^1。所以你的 b 是 5。你现在可以停下来,假设你知道该行实际上是几何的。如果您需要确定它是否是几何图形,请在其余数字上测试 b

128 8 512

8 可以用多种方式编写:8 = 1*8^18 = 2*2^28 = 2*4^18 = 4*2^1。因此,b 具有三个可能的值,c 具有几个不同的选项。首先尝试最大的。 8 不起作用。尝试4。有用! 128 = 2*4^3512 = 2*4^4。因此,b4c2

3 15 375

这个有点意思,因为第一个数字是素数,但不是 b,而是 c。因此,您需要确保如果您的第一个 b 候选数字对其余数字不起作用,您必须查看下一个最小的数字并将其分解。所以在这里你可以分解 15: 15 = 15*?^0 (退化情况),15 = 3*5^115 = 5*3 ^115 = 1*15^1。答案是 5,3 = 3*5^0,所以它是有效的。

Seth's answer is the right one. I'm leaving this answer here to help elaborate on why the answer to 128 8 512 is 4 because people seem to be having trouble with that.


A geometric progression's elements can be written in the form c*b^n where b is the number you're looking for (b is also necessarily greater than 1), c is a constant and n is some arbritrary number.

So the best bet is to start with the smallest number, factorize it and look at all possible solutions to writing it in the c*b^n form, then using that b on the remaining numbers. Return the largest result that works.

So for your examples:

125 5 625

Start with 5. 5 is prime, so it can be written in only one way: 5 = 1*5^1. So your b is 5. You can stop now, assuming you know the row is in fact geometric. If you need to determine whether it's geometric then test that b on the remaining numbers.

128 8 512

8 can be written in more than one way: 8 = 1*8^1, 8 = 2*2^2, 8 = 2*4^1, 8 = 4*2^1. So you have three possible values for b, with a few different options for c. Try the biggest first. 8 doesn't work. Try 4. It works! 128 = 2*4^3 and 512 = 2*4^4. So b is 4 and c is 2.

3 15 375

This one is a bit mean because the first number is prime but isn't b, it's c. So you'll need to make sure that if your first b-candidate doesn't work on the remaining numbers you have to look at the next smallest number and decompose it. So here you'd decompose 15: 15 = 15*?^0 (degenerate case), 15 = 3*5^1, 15 = 5*3^1, 15 = 1*15^1. The answer is 5, and 3 = 3*5^0, so it works out.

已下线请稍等 2024-10-02 14:33:45

编辑:我认为现在应该是正确的。

该算法不依赖因式分解,仅依赖欧几里得算法及其近似变体。这使得它在数学上比使用因式分解的解决方案稍微复杂一些,但速度会快得多。如果您了解欧几里得算法和对数,那么数学应该不是问题。

(1) 对数字集进行排序。您有以下形式的数字 ab^{n1} < ..< ab^{nk}

示例: (3 * 2, 3*2^5, 3*2^7, 3*2^13)

(2) 形成一个新列表,其第 (n+1) 个元素中的第 n 个元素排序列表的元素除以第 (n) 个元素。您现在有 b^{n2 - n1}、b^{n3 - n2}、...、b^{nk - n(k-1)}

(续)示例:(2^4, 2^2, 2^6)

定义 d_i = n_(i+1) - n_i (不要对此进行编程 --即使您想也不能这样做,因为 n_i 是未知的 - 这只是为了解释程序如何工作)。

(续)示例:d_1 = 4, d_2 = 2, d_3 = 6

请注意,在我们的示例问题中,我们可以自由选择 (a = 3, b = 2)< /code> 或 (a = 3/2, b = 4)。底线是“真实”b 的任何幂,它可以划分步骤 (2) 中列表中的所有条目,这就是正确答案。由此可见,我们可以将 b 求除所有 d_i 的任何幂(在本例中为除 4、2 和 6 的任何幂)。问题是我们既不知道 b 也不知道 d_i。但如果我们让m = gcd(d_1, ... d_(k-1)),那么我们就可以找到b^m,这就足够了。

注意:给定 b^ib^j,我们可以使用以下方法找到 b^gcd(i, j)

log( b^i) / log(b^j) = (i log b) / (j log b) = i/j

这允许我们使用欧几里得算法的修改版本来查找 b^ gcd(i, j) 。 “作用”全部在指数中:加法已被乘法取代,乘法被取幂,商(因此)被对数取代:

import math
def power_remainder(a, b):
    q = int(math.log(a) / math.log(b))
    return a / (b ** q)        

def power_gcd(a, b):
    while b != 1:
    a, b = b, power_remainder(a, b)
    return a

(3) 由于原始集合的所有元素因 r = b 的幂而异^gcd(d_1, ..., d_(k-1)),根据需要,它们都是 cr^n 形式。但是,c 可能不是整数。让我知道这是否有问题。

Edit: I think this should be correct now.

This algorithm does not rely on factoring, only on the Euclidean Algorithm, and a close variant thereof. This makes it slightly more mathematically sophisticated then a solution that uses factoring, but it will be MUCH faster. If you understand the Euclidean Algorithm and logarithms, the math should not be a problem.

(1) Sort the set of numbers. You have numbers of the form ab^{n1} < .. < ab^{nk}.

Example: (3 * 2, 3*2^5, 3*2^7, 3*2^13)

(2) Form a new list whose nth element of the (n+1)st element of the sorted list divided by the (n)th. You now have b^{n2 - n1}, b^{n3 - n2}, ..., b^{nk - n(k-1)}.

(Continued) Example: (2^4, 2^2, 2^6)

Define d_i = n_(i+1) - n_i (do not program this -- you couldn't even if you wanted to, since the n_i are unknown -- this is just to explain how the program works).

(Continued) Example: d_1 = 4, d_2 = 2, d_3 = 6

Note that in our example problem, we're free to take either (a = 3, b = 2) or (a = 3/2, b = 4). The bottom line is any power of the "real" b that divides all entries in the list from step (2) is a correct answer. It follows that we can raise b to any power that divides all the d_i (in this case any power that divides 4, 2, and 6). The problem is we know neither b nor the d_i. But if we let m = gcd(d_1, ... d_(k-1)), then we CAN find b^m, which is sufficient.

NOTE: Given b^i and b^j, we can find b^gcd(i, j) using:

log(b^i) / log(b^j) = (i log b) / (j log b) = i/j

This permits us to use a modified version of the Euclidean Algorithm to find b^gcd(i, j). The "action" is all in the exponents: addition has been replaced by multiplication, multiplication with exponentiation, and (consequently) quotients with logarithms:

import math
def power_remainder(a, b):
    q = int(math.log(a) / math.log(b))
    return a / (b ** q)        

def power_gcd(a, b):
    while b != 1:
    a, b = b, power_remainder(a, b)
    return a

(3) Since all the elements of the original set differ by powers of r = b^gcd(d_1, ..., d_(k-1)), they are all of the form cr^n, as desired. However, c may not be an integer. Let me know if this is a problem.

紫罗兰の梦幻 2024-10-02 14:33:45

最简单的方法是将数字分解并找到它们的最大共同点。但要小心,因式分解具有指数复杂性,因此如果行中的数字很大,它可能会停止工作。

The simplest approach would be to factorize the numbers and find the greatest number they have in common. But be careful, factorization has an exponential complexity so it might stop working if you get big numbers in the row.

怪我闹别瞎闹 2024-10-02 14:33:45

您想要的是知道连续所有数字的最大公约数。

一种方法是检查它们是否都能被该行中较小的数字整除。

如果不是,请尝试该行中较小数字的一半。

然后继续向下,直到找到一个可以整除它们的数字,或者你的除数等于 1。

What you want is to know the Greatest Common Divisor of all numbers in a row.

One method is to check if they all can be divided by the smaller number in the row.

If not, try half the smaller number in the row.

Then keep going down until you find a number that divides them all or your divisor equals 1.

贵在坚持 2024-10-02 14:33:45

Seth 答案不正确,应用该解决方案无法解决例如 128 8 2048 行 (2*4^x),您将得到:
8 128 2048 =>
16 16 =>
GCD = 16

确实,解决方案是此结果的一个因素,但您需要将其分解并逐一检查正确答案是什么,在这种情况下您将需要检查解决方案以相反的顺序 16, 8, 4, 2 进行因子分解,直到您看到 4 符合所有条件。

Seth Answer is not correct, applyin that solution does not solves 128 8 2048 row for example (2*4^x), you get:
8 128 2048 =>
16 16 =>
GCD = 16

It is true that the solution is a factor of this result but you will need to factor it and check one by one what is the correct answer, in this case you will need to check the solutions factors in reverse order 16, 8, 4, 2 until you see 4 matches all the conditions.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文