非消耗品的应用内购买问题
我正在开发一个应用程序，用户可以在其中购买他喜欢的任何图像。为此，我已将应用程序内购买功能实现为消耗品。这意味着如果用户再次购买相同的图像，他必须再次付费。但苹果拒绝了这一申请，称本案中的产品应为非消耗品。
现在的问题是我必须为每个图像创建唯一的产品 id，并且图像数量约为 1800。那么，我是否需要在 itunesconnect 中创建 1800 个 id？
此外，itunesconnect 中有一个参数：
For Review
当您测试了应用内购买并准备好批准并提交审核时，请上传下面的屏幕截图。这仅供审核之用，不会在商店中显示。
为此，我是否需要通过测试每个图像来添加屏幕截图？
请提供该问题的任何简单解决方案。
提前致谢...
I am developing an application in which user can purchase any image he likes. For this i have implemented the in app purchase functionality as consumable products. That means if user purchase the same image again, he has to pay for that again. But apple rejected this application by saying that the product should be non-consumable in this case.
Now the problem is i have to create unique product id for every image and the number of images are around 1800. So, do i need to make the 1800 ids in the itunesconnect?
Also, there is a parameter in itunesconnect that:
For Review
When you have tested your in app purchase and are ready to approve it and submit it for review, upload a screenshot below. This is for review purposes only and will not be displayed in the Store.
For this do i need to add screen shot by testing each and every image?
Please provide any simple solution for the problem.
Thank s in advance...
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
如果您有 1800 种独特的产品，则商店中将需要 1800 个条目。
没有自动上传产品信息的方法，因此您必须手动完成这一切。
If you have 1800 unique products, you will need 1800 entries in the store.
There isn't an automated means for uploading product information so you will have to do it all by hand.
请注意，您也许还会得到一个通用图像 IAP 对象，它是可消耗的。但您必须提供额外的服务器基础设施，以确保可以创建帐户并恢复购买。
即便如此，它似乎也是一条细线。然而，商店中有一些应用程序可以这种方式工作。
更新（2012 年 2 月）：它不再工作了。苹果拒绝了使用这种技术的最新应用程序。对不起。
Note that you maybe also come away with a generic image IAP object, that's consumable. But you have to provide additional server infrastructure to make sure a account can be created and purchases can be restored.
And even then, it seems to be a thin line. There are however apps in the store that work this way.
Update (Feb 2012): It's not working anymore. Apple rejected the latest app using this technique. I'm sorry.