意外构建时如何得到编译错误?

发布于 2024-09-24 18:40:32 字数 1106 浏览 8 评论 0原文

给定 2 个类:

...
class Grades{
public:
     Grades(int numExams) : _numExams(numExams){
        _grdArr = new double[numExams];
     }
     double GetAverage() const;
     ...
private: // The only data members of the class
     int _numExams;
     double *_grdArr;
};

class Student{
public:
     Student(Grades g) : _g(g){
     }
...
private: // The only data members of the class
     Grades _g;
};
...

并且,一个简短的主程序:

int main(){
     int n = 5; // number of students
     Grades g(3); // Initial grade for all students
     // ... Initialization of g – assume that it's correct
     Student **s = new Student*[n]; // Assume allocation succeeded
     for (int it = 0 ; it < n ; ++it){
          Grades tempG = g;
          // ... Some modification of tempG – assume that it's correct
          s[it] = new Student(tempG);
     }
// ...
return 0;
}

这段代码运行良好。 但由于拼写错误,该行:

Grades tempG = g;

已更改为:

Grades tempG = n;

并且仍然通过了编译。 我可以在代码(main() 代码)中做哪些简单的更改来通过该拼写错误获得编译错误?

Given 2 classes:

...
class Grades{
public:
     Grades(int numExams) : _numExams(numExams){
        _grdArr = new double[numExams];
     }
     double GetAverage() const;
     ...
private: // The only data members of the class
     int _numExams;
     double *_grdArr;
};

class Student{
public:
     Student(Grades g) : _g(g){
     }
...
private: // The only data members of the class
     Grades _g;
};
...

And, a short main program:

int main(){
     int n = 5; // number of students
     Grades g(3); // Initial grade for all students
     // ... Initialization of g – assume that it's correct
     Student **s = new Student*[n]; // Assume allocation succeeded
     for (int it = 0 ; it < n ; ++it){
          Grades tempG = g;
          // ... Some modification of tempG – assume that it's correct
          s[it] = new Student(tempG);
     }
// ...
return 0;
}

This code works fine.
But by typo mistake the line:

Grades tempG = g;

has changed to:

Grades tempG = n;

and still it passes the compilation.
What simple change can i do in the code (the main() code) to get a compilation error by that typo mistake?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

紙鸢 2024-10-01 18:40:32

这是因为 Grades 有一个单参数构造函数,充当转换构造函数。这样的构造函数接受一个 int 参数并创建一个 Grades 类型的对象。

因此编译成功。

明确“Grades”的构造函数

explicit Grades(int numExams);

这将不允许

Grades g = 2;

但允许以下所有内容

Grades g = Grades(2)  // direct initialization

Grades g = (Grades)2; // cast

Grades g = static_cast<Grades>(2);

Grades g(2);          // direct initialization.

This is because Grades has a single argument constructor which acts as a converting constructor. Such a constructor takes an int argument and creates an object of type Grades.

Therefore the compilation is successful.

Make the consructor of 'Grades' explicit

explicit Grades(int numExams);

This will disallow

Grades g = 2;

but allows all of the following

Grades g = Grades(2)  // direct initialization

Grades g = (Grades)2; // cast

Grades g = static_cast<Grades>(2);

Grades g(2);          // direct initialization.
⒈起吃苦の倖褔 2024-10-01 18:40:32

explicit 关键字添加到构造函数中:

explicit Grades(int ...) ...

Add the explicit keyword to the constructor:

explicit Grades(int ...) ...
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文