SFML.NET 粒子系统
我以前编写过粒子系统，简单地说，考虑到我想要它的项目的规模，它付出的努力超过了它的价值。我理想中寻找的是一个可以轻松放入 SFML.NET 项目而不需要大量手动集成的粒子系统。
是否已经存在任何东西可以满足这种需求（理想情况下不需要依赖 Tai 进行 OpenGL 访问），或者有人可以推荐他们用于另一个基于 .NET 的图形框架的粒子系统，该框架应该相当容易适应吗？
请记住，如果需要与 SFML.NET 集成，所涉及的工作应该比从头开始编写所需的工作少。
I've written particle systems before and, put simply, it's more effort than it's worth given the size of the projects I want it for. What I'm ideally looking for is a particle system which can be easily dropped into an SFML.NET project without needing a great deal of manual integration.
Does anything already exist to fill this need (ideally without needing to rely on Tao for OpenGL access), or can someone recommend a particle system they've used for another .NET-based grapics framework which should be fairly easy to adapt?
Keep in mind that if it needs work to integrate wtih SFML.NET, the work involved should be LESS than the work required to write one from scratch.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
燧石颗粒（以前称为燧石锋利）：
http://flintarticles.org/
Flint Particles (Formerly flint-sharp):
http://flintparticles.org/
SPARK 怎么样（也这里）？它是用 C++ 编写的，但声称与 SFML 集成，而且将 C++ 移植到 .NET 可能比从头开始编写粒子系统要少一些工作。
What about SPARK (also here)? It's written in C++, but it claims to integrate with SFML, and it may well be that porting the C++ to .NET would be less work than writing a particle system from scratch.
看起来简单但不幸的答案是：不。
It looks like the simple but unfortunate answer is: no.