You don't actually need any! TextMate or E-Texteditor and a decent browser (plus a few free tools), or (for a complete environment) Coda or Coda alternatives. But Dreamweaver and Photoshop are a good foundation; possibly Flash unless you want to go HTML5 with your media delivery etc. Depends on whether you hand-code or want a visual environment, or a bit of both. You'll probably also want to get a grip on JQuery or a similar Javascript library.
Just for graphics, Photoshop Elements will do - Photoshop is overkill, as is the GIMP - unless you're using Flash for complex interactive stuff, you only need to generate jpg, gif (animated or not) and png files. Or something free like Seashore (OS X) or alternatives. As for Adobe products, Fireworks is the one. If you want to generate original graphics programatically, try Nodebox (Python), ContextFree (C-ish) or Processing (Java-ish).
Then there's the wonderful Raphaël Javascript library, and various html canvas examples...
What Adobe products do you use or feel accomplish most of what is needed for web development.
None. I sold my Creative Suite a few years ago, and have never missed it for web development nor graphics.
In print production, it's hard to avoid Adobe's excellent, industry-standard products. But for the web, there are countless much cheaper alternatives for every purpose.
Everything seems to be moving away from browser plugins towards HTML and JavaScript so if you have not invested time and money into Flash development, don't go there.
There are excellent free alternatives for Dreamweaver. Personally I prefer Netbeans.
Most of the fancy Fireworks stuff (roll-overs etc.) you can hand code very easily if you use javascript libraries such as jQuery
BUT I have tried sooo many free or cheap alternatives to get my web graphics (banners, icons, sprites etc.) and there is nothing that comes close to the quality and productivity you get with Adobe Illustrator. It simply saves you hours and hours. If you don't care about graphics quality, you can churn out some icons pretty quickly with GIMP or Paint.NET or whatever, but it is simply not as productive and stunning as THE TOOL.
发布评论
评论（3）
你实际上不需要任何！ TextMate 或 电子文本编辑器和一个不错的浏览器（加上一些免费工具），或者（对于完整的环境）Coda 或 Coda 替代品。但 Dreamweaver 和 Photoshop 是很好的基础；可能是 Flash，除非您想使用 HTML5 进行媒体交付等。取决于您是手动编码还是想要视觉效果环境，或两者兼而有之。您可能还想掌握 JQuery 或类似的 Javascript 库。
仅对于图形，Photoshop Elements 就可以了 - Photoshop 和 GIMP 一样都太过分了 - 除非您使用 Flash 来处理复杂的交互式内容，否则您只需要生成 jpg、gif（动画或非动画）和 png 文件。或者免费的东西，例如 Seashore (OS X) 或替代方案。至于 Adobe 产品，Fireworks 就是其中之一。如果您想以编程方式生成原始图形，请尝试 Nodebox (Python)、ContextFree (C-ish) 或 处理 ( Java 风格）。
然后还有精彩的 Raphaël Javascript 库，以及各种 html 画布 示例...
You don't actually need any! TextMate or E-Texteditor and a decent browser (plus a few free tools), or (for a complete environment) Coda or Coda alternatives. But Dreamweaver and Photoshop are a good foundation; possibly Flash unless you want to go HTML5 with your media delivery etc. Depends on whether you hand-code or want a visual environment, or a bit of both. You'll probably also want to get a grip on JQuery or a similar Javascript library.
Just for graphics, Photoshop Elements will do - Photoshop is overkill, as is the GIMP - unless you're using Flash for complex interactive stuff, you only need to generate jpg, gif (animated or not) and png files. Or something free like Seashore (OS X) or alternatives. As for Adobe products, Fireworks is the one. If you want to generate original graphics programatically, try Nodebox (Python), ContextFree (C-ish) or Processing (Java-ish).
Then there's the wonderful Raphaël Javascript library, and various html canvas examples...
没有任何。几年前，我卖掉了我的 Creative Suite，并且从未错过过它用于 Web 开发或图形的功能。
在印刷制作中，很难避免 Adobe 出色的行业标准产品。但对于网络来说，有无数更便宜的替代品可以满足各种用途。
None. I sold my Creative Suite a few years ago, and have never missed it for web development nor graphics.
In print production, it's hard to avoid Adobe's excellent, industry-standard products. But for the web, there are countless much cheaper alternatives for every purpose.
一切似乎都在从浏览器插件转向 HTML 和 JavaScript，所以如果您没有在 Flash 开发上投入时间和金钱，就不要去那里。
Dreamweaver 有出色的免费替代品。我个人更喜欢 Netbeans。
大多数花哨的 Fireworks 东西（滚动等），如果您使用 jQuery 等 javascript 库，您可以非常轻松地编写代码
，但我已经尝试了很多免费或廉价的替代方案来获取我的网页图形（横幅、图标、精灵等）。 ）并且没有任何东西可以与 Adobe Illustrator 获得的质量和生产力相媲美。它只会为您节省大量时间。如果您不关心图形质量，您可以使用 GIMP 或 Paint.NET 等快速制作一些图标，但它根本不如工具那么高效和令人惊叹。
Everything seems to be moving away from browser plugins towards HTML and JavaScript so if you have not invested time and money into Flash development, don't go there.
There are excellent free alternatives for Dreamweaver. Personally I prefer Netbeans.
Most of the fancy Fireworks stuff (roll-overs etc.) you can hand code very easily if you use javascript libraries such as jQuery
BUT I have tried sooo many free or cheap alternatives to get my web graphics (banners, icons, sprites etc.) and there is nothing that comes close to the quality and productivity you get with Adobe Illustrator. It simply saves you hours and hours. If you don't care about graphics quality, you can churn out some icons pretty quickly with GIMP or Paint.NET or whatever, but it is simply not as productive and stunning as THE TOOL.