如何在 C++ 中生成随机数使用<随机>标题成员?

发布于 2024-09-24 01:39:08 字数 781 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我学会了用 C# 编程,并开始学习 C++。我正在使用 Visual Studio 2010 IDE。我正在尝试使用 中提供的分布类生成随机数。例如,我尝试执行以下操作:

    #include <random>
std::normal_distribution<double> *normal = new normal_distribution<double>(0.0, 0.0);
std::knuth_b *engine = new knuth_b();
std::variate_generator<knuth_b, normal_distribution<double>> *rnd;  
rnd = new variate_generator<knuth_b, normal_distribution<double>>(engine, normal);

最后一行给出编译器错误: IntelliSense:构造函数“std::tr1::variate_generator<_Engine, _Distrib>::variate_generator [with _Engine=std::tr1::knuth_b, _Distrib=std::tr1::normal_distribution]”没有实例与参数列表

匹配我觉得争论没问题,我做错了什么?当实例化这里的variate_generator类时,你调用哪个方法来获取下一个随机数,即.NET的System.Random.Next()?

I learned to program in C# and have started to learn C++. I'm using the Visual Studio 2010 IDE. I am trying to generate random numbers with the distribution classes available in <random>. For example I tried doing the following:

    #include <random>
std::normal_distribution<double> *normal = new normal_distribution<double>(0.0, 0.0);
std::knuth_b *engine = new knuth_b();
std::variate_generator<knuth_b, normal_distribution<double>> *rnd;  
rnd = new variate_generator<knuth_b, normal_distribution<double>>(engine, normal);

The last line gives a compiler error:
IntelliSense: no instance of constructor "std::tr1::variate_generator<_Engine, _Distrib>::variate_generator [with _Engine=std::tr1::knuth_b, _Distrib=std::tr1::normal_distribution]" matches the argument list

My arguments look ok to me, what am I doing wrong? When the variate_generator class here is instantiated, which method do you call to get the next random number i.e. .NET's System.Random.Next()?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

挽袖吟 2024-10-01 01:39:08

C++0x 中没有 variate_generator,但 std::bind 也可以工作。以下代码在 GCC 4.5.2 和 MSVC 2010 Express 中编译并运行:

#include <random>
#include <functional>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
    std::normal_distribution<> normal(10.0, 3.0); // mean 10, sigma 3
    std::random_device rd;
    std::mt19937 engine(rd()); // knuth_b fails in MSVC2010, but compiles in GCC
    std::function<double()> rnd = std::bind(normal, engine);

    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
}

PS:尽可能避免 new

There is no variate_generator in C++0x, but std::bind works just as well. The following compiles and runs in GCC 4.5.2 and MSVC 2010 Express:

#include <random>
#include <functional>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
    std::normal_distribution<> normal(10.0, 3.0); // mean 10, sigma 3
    std::random_device rd;
    std::mt19937 engine(rd()); // knuth_b fails in MSVC2010, but compiles in GCC
    std::function<double()> rnd = std::bind(normal, engine);

    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
    std::cout << rnd() << '\n';
}

PS: avoid new when you can.

汹涌人海 2024-10-01 01:39:08

警告:请注意,上述解决方案绑定了引擎的副本,而不是对引擎的引用。因此,如果您也这样做:
std::function rnd2 = std::bind(正常,引擎);
那么rnd对象和rnd2对象将产生完全相同的随机数序列。

ALERT: Note that the above solution binds a copy of the engine, not a reference to the engine. Thus, if you also do:
std::function rnd2 = std::bind(normal, engine);
then the rnd object and the rnd2 object will produce the exact same sequence of random numbers.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文