标签系统中的关键字或关键短语?

发布于 2024-09-24 00:17:12 字数 400 浏览 5 评论 0原文

In term of effectively categorizing web content, I am wondering what are the pros and cons between keyword (a.k.a tag, e.g, google-app-engine) and keyphrase (e.g. google app engine).

I know that delicious.com and this site are using keyword as a tag. But why don't they use keyphrase instead? If they use keyword, then it may cause certain inconsistences (e.g., app-engine and appengine, web-2.0 and web2.0). I wonder if I choose using keyphrase as a tag, then it will become much better. I have no clue why those two major sites don't work as the way I thought. Are there any cons of using keyphrase? Please point it out to me.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

沉默的熊 2024-10-01 00:17:12

明显的区别:

  • 如果您使用keywords-like-this,则多个关键字列表可以用空格分隔。

  • 如果您允许像这样的关键字短语中包含空格,则您无法使用空格分隔关键字短语。

这意味着您要么引入用户需要了解的其他分隔符,要么拥有更复杂的用户界面来编辑标签。

(您提到的不一致问题将以任何一种方式发生:appengine / appengineapp-engine / appengine .)

The obvious difference:

  • If you use keywords-like-this, then a list of multiple keywords can be space-separated.

  • If you allow keyphrases like this with spaces in, you can't space-separate the keyphrases.

That means you either introduce some other separator character that your users need to learn about, or you have a much more complex user interface for editing tags.

(The inconsistency problem you mention will happen either way: app engine / appengine vs. app-engine / appengine.)

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文