OSMF helps in standardizing and streamlining development for media delivery and will , as a framework , hide all the details from you the developer and give you a set of tools to simplify your task.
Also , OSMF aim at using the same tools whether you're dealing with video, audio & images. So on one hand , you have a simplified approach to develop your own video solution but on the other hand you can broaden this approach and use OSMF for all types of media.
It seems OSMF will get a lot of support, Flash is widely used for video delivery and media delivery, so the idea of a standardized approach has been welcomed by the community.
Strobe Media Playback is an implementation of OSMF , since Adobe is behind it , it may mean that they would want it to become a standard for video delivery in Flash. Of course JWP & FP have been around for quite some time, but my guess is SMP may come as a strong contender... Just a guess :)
It definitely seems like that's gonna become new standard flash player.
With Adobe behind it - I'd personally rather use that's free, open-source, no strings attached and directly from manufacturer.
Seems like no brainer to me.
Though - Strobe's docs are totally scattered all over the place....
This is now a very old post so I thought it would be good to revive it since a lot have changed the last 4 years.
StrobeMediaPlayback is no longer being maintained so the project has stranded. It is completely based on OSMF and can only be used on the Adobe Flash platform. You will probably have to use it in combination with another html5 player. OSMF has no html5 fallback. In my experience a lot of development is needed if you want to use it professionally. It is true that there are a lot of osmf plugins out there, but the default skin it comes with will probably need to be changed. And that will probably cost you between 2-6 months of work depending on what you need.
Flowplayer and JW Player is still actively being developed. My personal view is that JW Player is the strongest of the three when you compare feature set and so on, but JW Player is also a commercial player and it will cost you if you want to use it professionally. Flowplayer on the other hand has a GLP v3 license. So it is possible to use it free of charge. Please keep in mind though that you probably will end up spending quite a bit of time developing your final solution if you need it for a professional site. So the amount of resources you have to spend on Flowplayer more then defends buying a JW Player license. Both of these players comes in html5 with a flash fallback.
I have been maintaining a StrobeMediaPlayback custom flash/html5 player now for the last 2 years and although it has been fun, it has also cost us somewhere between 1200 and 2000 hours of development and maintenance only during the last two years. Multiply that with your hourly consultancy fee and you have a hefty sum.
It is no longer the case that you necessarily need to have a flash fallback though. You might as well go for a html5 player with the current browser support for html5 and the Media Source API. This means that there is no reason to choose StrobeMediaPlayback. You also don't need neither Flowplayer or JW Player. There are a lot of other html5 players out there.
If you want to use as little time as possible figuring out how things works, then I would go with JW Player. Development time costs money and JW player minimize that significantly.
If the license that JW Player doesn't go well with your business model and you can ignore the 2% users that still only can use flash, then I would go for a pure html5 video player.
发布评论
评论（3）
OSMF 有助于标准化和简化媒体交付的开发，并且作为一个框架，向开发人员隐藏所有细节，并为您提供一组工具来简化您的任务。
此外，无论您是处理视频、音频还是音频，OSMF 的目标都是使用相同的工具。图像。因此，一方面，您可以采用简化的方法来开发自己的视频解决方案，但另一方面，您可以扩展此方法并将 OSMF 用于所有类型的媒体。
看来OSMF会得到很多支持，Flash广泛用于视频传输和媒体传输，因此标准化方法的想法受到了社区的欢迎。
Strobe Media Playback 是 OSMF 的一种实现，由于 Adobe 是其背后的支持者，这可能意味着他们希望它成为 Flash 中视频传输的标准。当然是JWP & FP 已经存在相当长一段时间了，但我的猜测是 SMP 可能会成为一个强有力的竞争者......只是一个猜测:)
OSMF helps in standardizing and streamlining development for media delivery and will , as a framework , hide all the details from you the developer and give you a set of tools to simplify your task.
Also , OSMF aim at using the same tools whether you're dealing with video, audio & images. So on one hand , you have a simplified approach to develop your own video solution but on the other hand you can broaden this approach and use OSMF for all types of media.
It seems OSMF will get a lot of support, Flash is widely used for video delivery and media delivery, so the idea of a standardized approach has been welcomed by the community.
Strobe Media Playback is an implementation of OSMF , since Adobe is behind it , it may mean that they would want it to become a standard for video delivery in Flash. Of course JWP & FP have been around for quite some time, but my guess is SMP may come as a strong contender... Just a guess :)
我非常喜欢 Strobe 播放器中的 BSD 许可证。
看起来这肯定会成为新的标准 Flash 播放器。
有 Adobe 的支持 - 我个人更愿意使用免费、开源、无附加条件且直接来自制造商的软件。
对我来说似乎没什么问题。
虽然 - Strobe 的文档完全分散在各处......
I definitely love BSD license in Strobe player.
It definitely seems like that's gonna become new standard flash player.
With Adobe behind it - I'd personally rather use that's free, open-source, no strings attached and directly from manufacturer.
Seems like no brainer to me.
Though - Strobe's docs are totally scattered all over the place....
现在这是一篇非常旧的帖子，所以我认为恢复它会很好，因为过去 4 年发生了很多变化。
StrobeMediaPlayback 不再维护，因此该项目已搁浅。它完全基于OSMF，只能在Adobe Flash平台上使用。您可能需要将它与另一个 html5 播放器结合使用。 OSMF 没有 html5 后备。根据我的经验，如果你想专业地使用它，需要大量的开发。确实有很多 osmf 插件，但它附带的默认皮肤可能需要更改。这可能会花费您 2-6 个月的工作时间，具体取决于您的需求。
Flowplayer 和 JW Player 仍在积极开发中。我个人的看法是，从功能设置等方面比较，JW Player是三者中最强的，但JW Player也是商业播放器，如果你想专业使用它会花费你的钱。另一方面，Flowplayer 拥有 GLP v3 许可证。因此可以免费使用它。请记住，如果您需要专业网站，您可能最终会花费大量时间来开发最终解决方案。因此，您在 Flowplayer 上花费的资源量比购买 JW Player 许可证还要多。这两个播放器均采用 html5 格式，并带有 Flash 后备功能。
在过去的两年里，我一直在维护 StrobeMediaPlayback 自定义 flash/html5 播放器，尽管它很有趣，但仅在过去的两年里，它也花费了我们 1200 到 2000 小时的开发和维护时间。将其与每小时的咨询费相乘，你就得到了一笔巨款。
不过，您不再需要有闪存回退。您不妨选择当前浏览器支持 html5 和媒体源 API 的 html5 播放器。这意味着没有理由选择StrobeMediaPlayback。您也不需要 Flowplayer 或 JW Player。还有很多其他 html5 播放器。
如果你想用尽可能少的时间来弄清楚事情是如何运作的，那么我会选择 JW Player。开发时间需要金钱，而 JW Player 可以显着减少成本。
如果 JW Player 的许可证不适合您的商业模式，并且您可以忽略仍然只能使用 Flash 的 2% 用户，那么我会选择纯 html5 视频播放器。
支持媒体源 API：https:// developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MediaSource
IE 使用：http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_explorer.asp
Firefox 使用： http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_firefox.asp
这里是 html5 视频播放器的粗略比较。您可能会发现其他更好的比较：http://html5video.org/wiki/HTML5_Video_Player_Comparison< /a>
This is now a very old post so I thought it would be good to revive it since a lot have changed the last 4 years.
StrobeMediaPlayback is no longer being maintained so the project has stranded. It is completely based on OSMF and can only be used on the Adobe Flash platform. You will probably have to use it in combination with another html5 player. OSMF has no html5 fallback. In my experience a lot of development is needed if you want to use it professionally. It is true that there are a lot of osmf plugins out there, but the default skin it comes with will probably need to be changed. And that will probably cost you between 2-6 months of work depending on what you need.
Flowplayer and JW Player is still actively being developed. My personal view is that JW Player is the strongest of the three when you compare feature set and so on, but JW Player is also a commercial player and it will cost you if you want to use it professionally. Flowplayer on the other hand has a GLP v3 license. So it is possible to use it free of charge. Please keep in mind though that you probably will end up spending quite a bit of time developing your final solution if you need it for a professional site. So the amount of resources you have to spend on Flowplayer more then defends buying a JW Player license. Both of these players comes in html5 with a flash fallback.
I have been maintaining a StrobeMediaPlayback custom flash/html5 player now for the last 2 years and although it has been fun, it has also cost us somewhere between 1200 and 2000 hours of development and maintenance only during the last two years. Multiply that with your hourly consultancy fee and you have a hefty sum.
It is no longer the case that you necessarily need to have a flash fallback though. You might as well go for a html5 player with the current browser support for html5 and the Media Source API. This means that there is no reason to choose StrobeMediaPlayback. You also don't need neither Flowplayer or JW Player. There are a lot of other html5 players out there.
If you want to use as little time as possible figuring out how things works, then I would go with JW Player. Development time costs money and JW player minimize that significantly.
If the license that JW Player doesn't go well with your business model and you can ignore the 2% users that still only can use flash, then I would go for a pure html5 video player.
Support for Media Source API: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MediaSource
IE usage: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_explorer.asp
Firefox usage: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_firefox.asp
Here is a crude comparison of html5 video players. You might find other comparisons out there that is better: http://html5video.org/wiki/HTML5_Video_Player_Comparison