jQTouch 和 jQuery mobile 之间的区别
What is the difference between jQTouch & jQuery Mobile Framework ?
Are they related (other than being both based on jQuery) ?
Do they have the same goal ?
Edit: jQTouch is now jQT
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(4)
jQtouch针对WebKit进行了优化,jQuery Mobile希望支持所有移动设备;这是我的理解,
这里有一些很好的信息
http://jquerymobile.com/strategy/
和这里
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1602169
jQtouch is optimized for WebKit, jQuery Mobile is looking to support all mobile devices; that is my understanding
some good info here
http://jquerymobile.com/strategy/
and here
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1602169
除了 Aaron 的回答之外,这就是我到目前为止所得出的结论:
Additionally to Aaron's answer this is what I've come up with so far:
要详细了解并了解移动框架之间的差异,
您可以考虑以下链接。
http://web.bogdanteodoru.com/resources/mobile-framework-comparasion/
For detailed understanding and to know the differences between mobile frameworks,
you can consider the following link.
http://web.bogdanteodoru.com/resources/mobile-framework-comparasion/
正如我在博客文章中讨论的那样:
http://zsprawl。 com/iOS/2012/04/comparing-jquery-mobile-vs-jqtouch/
我发现 jQuery Mobile 的功能更加丰富,并且具有更好的跨平台支持。 JQTouch 非常轻量级,非常适合只需要导航的“基于表单”的应用程序。它缺少用户要求的许多功能,并且已被拒绝,例如固定页脚和标签栏。
As I discuss on my blog post:
http://zsprawl.com/iOS/2012/04/comparing-jquery-mobile-vs-jqtouch/
I find jQuery Mobile a lot more feature rich and with a lot better cross platform support. JQTouch is very lightweight and great for "form-based" apps that just need navigation. It is missing a lot of the features that users have asked for, and have been turned down, like fixed footers and tabbars.