ruby 的多索引容器

发布于 2024-09-16 09:59:40 字数 692 浏览 2 评论 0原文

除了 ruby​​ 之外,还有类似 boost::multi_index 的东西吗?基本上采取一些 对象的容器,并使用 N 种不同的查询方法对其进行 N 种不同的索引。

我想你可以将 DataMapper 与内存数据库中的 SQLite 一起使用,但我是 想知道周围是否有纯红宝石。

下面是此类类可能执行的操作的想象示例。看起来很 很像数据库。

class Foo
    attr_accessor :a
    attr_accessor :b
    attr_accessor :c
end


class FooIndexer < MultiIndex
    hash_index :a do |o|
        o.a
    end

    ordered_index :b do |x, y|
        x.b <=> y.b
    end
end


index = FooIndexer.new

index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))


index.find ( index.a == 10 )
index.find ( index.b > 10  )

Is there anything like boost::multi_index but for ruby. Basically taking some
container of objects and having it indexed N different ways with N different query methods.

I guess you could use DataMapper with the SQLite in memory database but I was
wondering if there is anything pure ruby around.

Below is an imagined example of what this type of class might do. It looks very
much like a database.

class Foo
    attr_accessor :a
    attr_accessor :b
    attr_accessor :c
end


class FooIndexer < MultiIndex
    hash_index :a do |o|
        o.a
    end

    ordered_index :b do |x, y|
        x.b <=> y.b
    end
end


index = FooIndexer.new

index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))
index.insert( Foo.new ( ... ))


index.find ( index.a == 10 )
index.find ( index.b > 10  )

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

夜吻♂芭芘 2024-09-23 09:59:40

这是一个完整的解决方案,包括规格,但仅适用于
多个哈希键。

require 'pp'

class MKey
  def initialize &bk
    @block = bk
    @containers = {}
  end

  def <<(val)
    keys = @block.call(val)
    keys.each do |k,v|
      @containers[k] ||= {}
      @containers[k][v] = val
    end
  end

  def [](key)
    k, v = key.first
    @containers[k][v]
  end

  def delete(key)
    val = self[key]
    keys = @block.call(val)
    keys.each do |k,v|
      @containers[k].delete(v)
    end
  end

  include Enumerable

  def each
    k, c = @containers.first 
    c.each do |k, val|
      yield val
    end
  end

end


describe MKey do 

  class Foo
    def initialize(a,b)
      @a = a
      @b = b
    end
    attr_accessor :a
    attr_accessor :b
  end

  it "should insert" do

    index = MKey.new do |o|
      { :a => o.a,
        :b => o.b
      }
    end

    x = Foo.new("hello", "cat")
    y = Foo.new("goodbye", "code")

    index << x
    index << y

    # Test Enumerable interface
    index.find do |val|
      val.a == "hello"
    end.should == x

    # Test multi key interface
    index[:a => "hello"].should == x
    index[:b => "code"].should == y

    index.delete(:a => "hello")

    index[:a => "hello"].should == nil
    index[:b => "code"].should == y

    index.delete(:b => "code")

    index[:a => "hello"].should == nil
    index[:b => "code"].should == nil


  end

  it "hash lookup should be faster than find" do


    index = MKey.new do |o|
      { :a => o.a,
        :b => o.b
      }
    end

    for i in 1..10000
      index << Foo.new(i, i*100)
    end

    t0 = timer do
      index[:a => 1000]
    end

    t1 = timer do
      index.find {|v| v.a == 10000}
    end

    t0.should < t1 * 100 

  end

end

This is a fully worked solution including spec but only for
multiple hash keys.

require 'pp'

class MKey
  def initialize &bk
    @block = bk
    @containers = {}
  end

  def <<(val)
    keys = @block.call(val)
    keys.each do |k,v|
      @containers[k] ||= {}
      @containers[k][v] = val
    end
  end

  def [](key)
    k, v = key.first
    @containers[k][v]
  end

  def delete(key)
    val = self[key]
    keys = @block.call(val)
    keys.each do |k,v|
      @containers[k].delete(v)
    end
  end

  include Enumerable

  def each
    k, c = @containers.first 
    c.each do |k, val|
      yield val
    end
  end

end


describe MKey do 

  class Foo
    def initialize(a,b)
      @a = a
      @b = b
    end
    attr_accessor :a
    attr_accessor :b
  end

  it "should insert" do

    index = MKey.new do |o|
      { :a => o.a,
        :b => o.b
      }
    end

    x = Foo.new("hello", "cat")
    y = Foo.new("goodbye", "code")

    index << x
    index << y

    # Test Enumerable interface
    index.find do |val|
      val.a == "hello"
    end.should == x

    # Test multi key interface
    index[:a => "hello"].should == x
    index[:b => "code"].should == y

    index.delete(:a => "hello")

    index[:a => "hello"].should == nil
    index[:b => "code"].should == y

    index.delete(:b => "code")

    index[:a => "hello"].should == nil
    index[:b => "code"].should == nil


  end

  it "hash lookup should be faster than find" do


    index = MKey.new do |o|
      { :a => o.a,
        :b => o.b
      }
    end

    for i in 1..10000
      index << Foo.new(i, i*100)
    end

    t0 = timer do
      index[:a => 1000]
    end

    t1 = timer do
      index.find {|v| v.a == 10000}
    end

    t0.should < t1 * 100 

  end

end
深海夜未眠 2024-09-23 09:59:40

听起来您正在寻找一种实现此功能的特定方法。但就类似 ruby​​ 的界面而言,我建议仅使用 Enumerable#find 方法。这样,您就可以说

foo_container = [FooIndexer.new, ...]
foo_container.find{|x| x.a == 10}

这看起来非常像您的示例,除了大括号而不是圆括号!

稍后,如果您发现性能非常糟糕,您可能需要某种缓存或优化的find。但是,仅基于您的问题,如果您现在就寻找它,那么您就会优化得太早。

Enumerable 已经提供了很多这样的东西,所以你有自然的扩展,比如

foo_container.select{|x| x.a == 10}  # Finds all instances.
foo_container.reject{|x| x.a == 10}  # Finds the complementary set.

It sounds like you're after a particular way of implementing this feature. But in terms of a ruby-like interface, I would recommend just using the Enumerable#find method. That way, you can say

foo_container = [FooIndexer.new, ...]
foo_container.find{|x| x.a == 10}

which looks very much like your example, save for braces instead of parentheses!

Later, if you find performance very bad, you may want to have some kind of cached or optimized find. But, based only on your question, if you look for that now, you'll be optimizing too soon.

Enumerable provides lots of these things already, so you have natural extensions like

foo_container.select{|x| x.a == 10}  # Finds all instances.
foo_container.reject{|x| x.a == 10}  # Finds the complementary set.
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文