linux g++将 64 位共享库代码链接到静态库

发布于 2024-09-15 10:37:16 字数 247 浏览 4 评论 0原文

上下文:我可以创建一个链接到静态库的共享对象库,在 32 位 Linux 上没有任何问题。当我在 64 位 Linux 上尝试相同的构建时,我看到这个链接器错误:

  • 在创建共享对象时不能使用针对“本地符号”的重定位 R_X86_64_32S;使用 -fPIC 重新编译

此错误在网络上很常见。解决方案是使用位置无关代码(-fPIC)编译静态链接库。

我不明白为什么 32 位版本不需要这样做。有人可以帮忙吗?

Context: I can create a shared object library which is linked to a static library without any problems on 32bit linux. When I attempt the same build on 64bit linux, I see this linker error:

  • relocation R_X86_64_32S against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

This error is quite common on the web. The solution is to compile the statically linked library with position independent code (-fPIC).

What I do not understand is why this is not required for the 32bit build. Can anyone help out?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

划一舟意中人 2024-09-22 10:37:16

如果您的目标模块将在共享库中使用,则始终需要“位置无关代码”。它高度依赖于平台,并且会产生一些开销。

您必须在 amd64(而非 x386)上显式指定它的原因很简单,因为它恰好是 x86(而非 amd64)的默认值。

还要注意“-fpic”和“-fPIC”之间的区别:

-fpic
    Generate position-independent code (PIC) suitable for use in a 
    shared library, if supported for the target machine. Such code 
    accesses all constant addresses through a global offset table 
    (GOT). The dynamic loader resolves the GOT entries when the pro-
    gram starts (the dynamic loader is not part of GCC; it is part
    of the operating system). If the GOT size for the linked execu-
    table exceeds a machine-specific maximum size, you get an error 
    message from the linker indicating that -fpic does not work; in 
    that case, recompile with -fPIC instead. (These maximums are 8k 
    on the SPARC and 32k on the m68k and RS/6000. The 386 has no 
    such limit.)

    Position-independent code requires special support, and there
    fore works only on certain machines. For the 386, GCC supports 
    PIC for System V but not for the Sun 386i. Code generated for 
    the IBM RS/6000 is always position-independent.

    When this flag is set, the macros __pic__ and __PIC__ are defined to 1.

-fPIC
    If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent 
    code, suitable for dynamic linking and avoiding any limit on the 
    size of the global offset table. This option makes a difference 
    on the m68k, PowerPC and SPARC.

    Position-independent code requires special support, and therefore 
    works only on certain machines.

    When this flag is set, the macros __pic__ and __PIC__ are defined to 2. 

"Position Independent Code" is always required if your object module will be used in a shared library. It's highly platform dependent, and it incurs some overhead.

The reason you have to specify it explicitly on amd64, but not x386, is simply that it happens to be the default for x86, but not amd64.

Note, too, the difference between "-fpic" and "-fPIC":

-fpic
    Generate position-independent code (PIC) suitable for use in a 
    shared library, if supported for the target machine. Such code 
    accesses all constant addresses through a global offset table 
    (GOT). The dynamic loader resolves the GOT entries when the pro-
    gram starts (the dynamic loader is not part of GCC; it is part
    of the operating system). If the GOT size for the linked execu-
    table exceeds a machine-specific maximum size, you get an error 
    message from the linker indicating that -fpic does not work; in 
    that case, recompile with -fPIC instead. (These maximums are 8k 
    on the SPARC and 32k on the m68k and RS/6000. The 386 has no 
    such limit.)

    Position-independent code requires special support, and there
    fore works only on certain machines. For the 386, GCC supports 
    PIC for System V but not for the Sun 386i. Code generated for 
    the IBM RS/6000 is always position-independent.

    When this flag is set, the macros __pic__ and __PIC__ are defined to 1.

-fPIC
    If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent 
    code, suitable for dynamic linking and avoiding any limit on the 
    size of the global offset table. This option makes a difference 
    on the m68k, PowerPC and SPARC.

    Position-independent code requires special support, and therefore 
    works only on certain machines.

    When this flag is set, the macros __pic__ and __PIC__ are defined to 2. 
于我来说 2024-09-22 10:37:16

好的,答案在这里详细描述: http://www.technovelty.org /code/c/amd64-pic.html

解释的基本要点是 i386 体系结构隐式取消引用每个函数的帧指针(在链接页面的最后一段中进行了解释)。此过程会产生一些额外的开销,因此在新的 64 位架构中,这种取消引用的开销作为优化被消除了。

从链接的角度来看,这种优化的结果是,除非将 64 位代码显式编译为位置无关代码,否则它将生成带有其执行上下文偏移量的硬编码代码。

这是对链接页面内容的不完美解释,但足以满足我的目的。

Ok the answer is described in detail here: http://www.technovelty.org/code/c/amd64-pic.html.

The basic gist of the explanation is that the i386 architecture implicitly dereferences the frame pointer for each function (explained on the last paragraph of the linked page). This process incurs some extra overhead so in the new 64-bit architectures, this dereferencing overhead was eliminated as an optimization.

The consequence of this optimization from a linking perspective was that unless 64-bit code is explicitly compiled as position independent code, it will produce code that is hard-coded with offsets for its execution context.

This is an imperfect explanation of the content in the linked page but it suffices for my purposes.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文