48 分钟进入和维持程序员流程的技巧

发布于 2024-09-14 05:35:29 字数 590 浏览 1 评论 0原文

我一直致力于在工作时进入并维持心流状态,在研究这个概念时,我遇到了 这个网站解决了在短时间内维持流量的想法。该技术规定,人们设定一个 48 分钟的计时器,在这段时间里他们完全专注于自己的工作,当计时器用完时,他们会花 12 分钟做任何事情。

然而,在该声明正上方的段落中引用了 Peopleware 的内容:至少需要15分钟不间断的时间才能进入心流状态。

当读到这一点时,48 分钟的技巧似乎违反直觉,因为每 48 分钟你就会“打破”你的流程,一旦你再次开始,你就必须花 15 分钟回到它,所以你真的只得到(在最多)33 分钟的“流动时间”。显然这些数量不一定是严格的,但你明白了。

我的问题是针对那些尝试过与所描述的类似计时技术的人。在我看来,这种技术的唯一理由是它可能会减少重新进入该流程所需的时间。使用过这种技术的人可以提供一些说明吗?

I have been working at entering and sustaining periods of flow while working, and while researching the concept I came across this site which addressed the idea of sustaining flow in short bursts. The technique specifies that one sets a timer for 48 minutes in which they focus purely on their work, and when the timer runs out they spend 12 minutes doing whatever.

However, in the paragraph directly above that statement is a quote from Peopleware saying that it takes at least 15 uninterrupted minutes to enter a state of flow.

When reading that point, the 48 minute technique seemed counter-intuitive, since every 48 minutes you are "breaking" your flow, and once you start up again you have to spend 15 minutes going back into it, so you really only get (at a maximum) 33 minutes of "flow time". Obviously these quantities aren't necessarily rigid, but you get the idea.

My question is to those who have tried a timing technique similar to the one described. As I see it, the only justification for this technique is that it possibly reduces the amount of time it takes to re-enter that period of flow. Can anyone who has used this technique provide some clarification?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

橘香 2024-09-21 05:35:29

我已经尝试了番茄工作法大约一周了。我并没有过多关注维护已完成和中断的冲刺检查清单的细节,而是以当天想要完成的任务开始新的一天,并使用 25 条记录尽可能好地完成这些任务。 - 分钟冲刺和五分钟休息。

番茄工作法建议利用休息时间放松、伸展双腿、喝杯咖啡等。我注意到,那些不需要完全转移注意力并且可以自动完成的活动不会破坏流程,而是帮助我净化思想并重新集中注意力。就好像你让自己离开树林,观察一下森林,然后再潜入森林。

在短暂的试用期后,我放弃了番茄工作法,因为我发现,就我而言,简单地坐下来可以获得最大的好处早上写下我那天想做的事情。一旦做出决定并开始工作,我发现我陷入了一种自然的节奏。我工作直到感到无聊、沮丧或被打扰,然后休息一下并继续。我发现冲刺冲刺的时间并没有增加多少价值。

YMMV,但至少值得尝试一下。

I've tried the Pomodoro Technique for a week or so. I didn't focus too much on the details of maintaining check lists of completed and interrupted sprints, but rather I started the day with the tasks that I wanted to do on that day, and went through them as best as I could using the 25-minute sprints and five-minute breaks.

The Pomodoro Technique suggests to use the breaks to relax, stretch your legs, grab a coffee, etc. I've noticed that activities like those that don't require a total focus shift and can be done on automatic don't break the flow, but rather helped me cleanse my mind and refocus my attention. It's as if you're allowing yourself to step away from the trees to survey the forest for a bit before diving back in.

I dropped Pomodoro after that short trial period because I found that in my case I got the most benefit from simply sitting down in the morning and writing down what I wanted to do on that day. Once the decision is made and the work is started I found that I fall into a natural rhythm of sorts. I work until I'm bored, frustrated, or interrupted, then I take a break and continue. I didn't find that time boxing my sprints added much value.

YMMV, but it's worth at least giving it a try.

丶视觉 2024-09-21 05:35:29

计时器对我来说很糟糕,因为它可能会在关键时刻响起并打断我的思路。

对我来说,最大化流程首先要(1)首先防止即将到来的干扰(即确保禁用电话和其他中断,并且安排的任何事情(例如会议)距离足够远,不可能遇到它),然后(2) 尽可能长时间地解决手头的问题,但同时要努力认识到自己何时没有取得进展。

如果我认为自己正在取得进步,无论进展有多慢,我都会尽我所能继续前进。但如果我看起来陷入困境或原地踏步,我就会停下来,去做其他事情,即使其他事情是从不同的问题开始的。我让我的潜意识停留在最初的问题上,一旦我有一种感觉,我感到新鲜或好奇,足以重新开始,我就会这样做。

A timer would be terrible for me, because it might go off and interrupt my train of thought at a critical moment.

For me, maximizing flow would begin by (1) first preventing forthcoming distractions (ie, making sure phone calls and other interrupts are disabled and that anything scheduled, like a meeting, is sufficiently far off there's no possibility of running into it), then (2) working on the problem at hand as long as I can, but all the while trying to recognize when I'm not making progress.

If I think I'm making progress, no matter how slowly, I just keep going as long as I can. But if I appear to be stuck or going in circles, I stop, and do something else instead, even if that something else is starting on a different problem. I let my subconscious dwell on the original problem, and once I have a feeling I feel fresh or curious enough to restart again, I do.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文