我应该在 gd 上安装 Imagmagick
我开始从事一个需要大量图像处理的项目。我记得过去的印象是 imagemagick 比 GD 更好。
由于我只有 GD，这将需要我安装 imagemagick，并且我想确保它值得麻烦。有人可以澄清一下 imagemagick 是否真的比 GD 更好，以及它究竟如何更好？它是否有更多的教程和代码，或者它更快，或者更强大，我到底应该使用它什么以及为什么？现在大多数人用的是什么？
I'm starting to work on a project that will require a lot of image manipulation. I remember getting the impression in the past that imagemagick was somehow better than GD.
Since I have GD only, this will require me to install imagemagick, and I want to make sure it's worth the trouble. Can someone clarify if it's true that imagemagick is a better choice than GD, and how exactly is it better? Does it have more tutorials and code, or is it faster, or is more powerful, what exactly and why should I use it? What is it that most people use now?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
Imagemagick 非常灵活，是图形翻译的一把瑞士军刀。也就是说，它没有很好地集成到 PHP 中。例如，安装 PHP 扩展就相当困难。
我安装它的唯一原因是如果我真的想做一些 GD 中没有的事情。除此之外，我不会猜测它会更快或其他什么。
Imagemagick is pretty flexible and is a whole swiss army knife of graphical translations. That said it isn't as well integrated into PHP. It's quite a lot harder to install its PHP extension for example.
The only reason I would install it is if I really wanted to do something that wasn't available in GD. Other than that, I would not guess that it is any faster or anything.