You can use both (not in the same app!) but be carefull in what you pick!
I do my homeworks, trying both (on different apps of course) and asking around to friends. There's not a final verdict of course. Sdk are pretty both easy, but of course iAD is completely integrated in itunesconnect, so you don't have to deal with different sites, registration and so on... but ok, is something you do once and forget, so not a big deal.
For my experience iAd give bit more money for banner shown, but AdMob have an incredible superior fill rate! I you're an "international" developer iAd is (till now, end of 2010) a poor option: my app have about 25% US customers and a forthy-somthing fill rate there. Add some more sparse filled impressions here and there, I net a 10% fill rate world-wide! The other app, with AdMob, Italian market only, have a 66% fill rate... in a country where iAd is still not available!
So 'till Apple don't go worldwide for ads i suggest to put your focus on WHERE you plan to distribuite your apps...
Better to go with iAds. No one knows, apple releases an update and your application starts breaking. They are very much into it and for wiping out their competitors, its high possibility that they do it very soon.
一个想法。结合使用两者怎么样？到目前为止，iAds 的填充率非常低。 Apple 建议在广告请求未满足时将 BannerView 移出屏幕（好主意）。将 BannerView 移出屏幕后，为什么不将 AdMob 广告移至空白处。不确定混合广告平台是否会导致用户体验不佳，但这可能值得考虑。
只是一个想法。
安德鲁
An idea. What about using a combination of the two? So far, the story on iAds is that the fill rate is very low. Apple suggests moving the BannerView off-screen when the ad request is not filled (great idea). After moving the BannerView off-screen, why not move an AdMob ad into the void. Not sure if mixing ad platforms would cause poor user experience, but it might be worth considering.
发布评论
评论（4）
事实上，即使在同一个应用程序中使用两者也非常容易！
你可以在这个网站找到详细的解释：
http://www.apptite.be/tutorial_mixing_ads.php
但简而言之，其背后的想法是：
它甚至使用滑动效果来隐藏和显示广告在屏幕底部。
到目前为止，我无法给出正确的收入数字，但我可以说iAd 的填充率约为 30%，Admob 的填充率约为 95%
希望这对您有所帮助！
问候，
吕克
In fact it is very easy to use both even in the same application!
You can find a detailed explanation at this site:
http://www.apptite.be/tutorial_mixing_ads.php
But in-short the idea behind it is to:
It even uses a sliding effect to hide and show the advertisements in the bottom of the screen.
So far I can't give a correct number on the revenue, but I can say that the fill rate for iAd is around 30% and for Admob around 95%
Hope this helps you out!
Regards,
Luc
您可以同时使用两者（不在同一个应用程序中！），但请谨慎选择！
我会做作业，尝试两种方法（当然是在不同的应用程序上）并向朋友询问。
当然，还没有最终的判决。 sdk 都非常简单，但当然 iAD 完全集成在 itunesconnect 中，因此您不必处理不同的站点、注册等...但是好吧，这是您执行一次后就忘记的事情，所以不是一个大问题交易。
根据我的经验，iAd 会为显示的横幅付出更多的钱，但 AdMob 拥有令人难以置信的卓越填充率！如果你是一名“国际”开发者，iAd（到目前为止，2010 年底）是一个糟糕的选择：我的应用程序拥有大约 25% 的美国客户，并且那里的填充率约为 40%。到处添加一些稀疏的填充印象，我在全球范围内获得了 10% 的填充率！
另一个带有 AdMob 的应用程序（仅限意大利市场）的填充率达到 66%...在一个 iAd 仍然无法使用的国家！
因此，在 Apple 不再向全球投放广告之前，我建议您将重点放在计划分发应用程序的地方...
仅我的 2 美分
You can use both (not in the same app!) but be carefull in what you pick!
I do my homeworks, trying both (on different apps of course) and asking around to friends.
There's not a final verdict of course. Sdk are pretty both easy, but of course iAD is completely integrated in itunesconnect, so you don't have to deal with different sites, registration and so on... but ok, is something you do once and forget, so not a big deal.
For my experience iAd give bit more money for banner shown, but AdMob have an incredible superior fill rate! I you're an "international" developer iAd is (till now, end of 2010) a poor option: my app have about 25% US customers and a forthy-somthing fill rate there. Add some more sparse filled impressions here and there, I net a 10% fill rate world-wide!
The other app, with AdMob, Italian market only, have a 66% fill rate... in a country where iAd is still not available!
So 'till Apple don't go worldwide for ads i suggest to put your focus on WHERE you plan to distribuite your apps...
Just my 2 cents
最好搭配 iAds。没有人知道，苹果发布了更新，你的应用程序开始崩溃。他们非常热衷于消灭竞争对手，他们很有可能很快就会做到这一点。
最终这是您的选择，您可以使用任何一个。
Better to go with iAds. No one knows, apple releases an update and your application starts breaking. They are very much into it and for wiping out their competitors, its high possibility that they do it very soon.
Ultimately its your choice, you can use any.
一个想法。结合使用两者怎么样？到目前为止，iAds 的填充率非常低。 Apple 建议在广告请求未满足时将 BannerView 移出屏幕（好主意）。将 BannerView 移出屏幕后，为什么不将 AdMob 广告移至空白处。不确定混合广告平台是否会导致用户体验不佳，但这可能值得考虑。
只是一个想法。
安德鲁
An idea. What about using a combination of the two? So far, the story on iAds is that the fill rate is very low. Apple suggests moving the BannerView off-screen when the ad request is not filled (great idea). After moving the BannerView off-screen, why not move an AdMob ad into the void. Not sure if mixing ad platforms would cause poor user experience, but it might be worth considering.
Just a thought.
Andrew