查找尚未使用的最简单整数组合的算法

发布于 2024-09-11 02:11:10 字数 468 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我正在寻找一种算法,用于查找尚未使用的 0 到 5 之间的整数的最简单组合(即由最少数量的整数组成的组合)(使用的组合位于列表中)。

顺序确实很重要,并且组合应在列表中返回。

例如,包含所用数字的列表可能如下所示:

{{0},{1},{2},{3 },{4},{0,0},{0,1},{0,2},...,{2,1},{2,2},...,{1,5,4 },...}

在这种情况下,算法应返回包含 {5} 的列表,因为 {5} 是由最少整数组成的组合。

如果列表如下所示:

{{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{0,0},{0,1},{0,2}, {0,3},{0,5},...}

该算法应返回包含 0 和 4 的列表 ({0,4})。

由于它要在 Java 中使用,因此最好使用 Java 答案,但也可以使用伪代码或其他编程语言。

先感谢您!

I am looking for an algorithm for finding the simplest combination of integers from 0 to 5 (that is the one that consists of the fewest number of integers) that has not yet been used (the used combinations are in a list).

The order does matter and the combinations should be returned in a list.

For example, the list with the used numbers could look like this:

{{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{0,0},{0,1},{0,2},...,{2,1},{2,2},...,{1,5,4},...}

In this case, the algorithm should return a list with {5}, as {5} is the combination that consists of the fewest integers.

If the list looks like this:

{{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{0,0},{0,1},{0,2},{0,3},{0,5},...}

the algorithm should return a list with 0 and 4 ({0,4}).

As it is to be used in Java, a Java answer is preferable but pseudo-code or other programming languages are usable too.

Thank you in advance!

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(5

滴情不沾 2024-09-18 02:11:10

我猜例子2是错误的:
对于 {{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{0,1},{0,2},{0,3},{0,5}, ...} 最小的解决方案是 {0,0},而不是 {0,4}

完整的解决方案在这里:

import java.util.*;

public class Algorithm {

    static List<List<Integer>> getChildren(List<Integer> node){
        List<List<Integer>> children = new ArrayList<List<Integer>>();
        for(int i = 0; i < 6; i++){
            List<Integer> child = new ArrayList<Integer>(node);
            child.add(i);
            children.add(child);
        }
        return children;
    }

    static List<Integer> find(Queue<List<Integer>> queue, Set<List<Integer>> set){

        for(;;){
            List<Integer> head = queue.poll();
            if(!set.contains(head)){
                return head;
            } else {
                for(List<Integer> child : getChildren(head)){
                    queue.add(child);
                }
            }
        }
    }

    public static void main(String[] arg) {
        Queue<List<Integer>> queue = new LinkedList<List<Integer>>();
        for(int i = 0; i < 6; i++){
            queue.add(Collections.singletonList(i));
        }
        // Example {{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{0,1},{0,2},{0,3},{0,5},...}
        Set<List<Integer>> task = new HashSet<List<Integer>>();
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(1));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(2));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(3));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(4));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(5));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 1));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 2));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 3));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 5));

        System.out.println(find(queue, task));
    }

}

I guess example 2 is wrong:
for {{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{0,1},{0,2},{0,3},{0,5},...} smallest solution is {0,0}, not {0,4}

Complete solutions is here:

import java.util.*;

public class Algorithm {

    static List<List<Integer>> getChildren(List<Integer> node){
        List<List<Integer>> children = new ArrayList<List<Integer>>();
        for(int i = 0; i < 6; i++){
            List<Integer> child = new ArrayList<Integer>(node);
            child.add(i);
            children.add(child);
        }
        return children;
    }

    static List<Integer> find(Queue<List<Integer>> queue, Set<List<Integer>> set){

        for(;;){
            List<Integer> head = queue.poll();
            if(!set.contains(head)){
                return head;
            } else {
                for(List<Integer> child : getChildren(head)){
                    queue.add(child);
                }
            }
        }
    }

    public static void main(String[] arg) {
        Queue<List<Integer>> queue = new LinkedList<List<Integer>>();
        for(int i = 0; i < 6; i++){
            queue.add(Collections.singletonList(i));
        }
        // Example {{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{0,1},{0,2},{0,3},{0,5},...}
        Set<List<Integer>> task = new HashSet<List<Integer>>();
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(1));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(2));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(3));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(4));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(5));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 1));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 2));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 3));
        task.add(Arrays.asList(0, 5));

        System.out.println(find(queue, task));
    }

}
请别遗忘我 2024-09-18 02:11:10

如果您的列表是有序的,我可以想到两种比线性搜索更好的方法。

假设您不会完全填满组合空间,则可以使用二分搜索的变体。

首先,我们将每组大小为“x”的组称为一组。因此,0,1,2,3,4,5 是组 1,{0,0} 到 {5,5} 是组 2。

从组 1 开始,检查包含组中最后一个值的列表位置,如果他们都在那里。例如,List[5] == 5。如果是这样,请转到第 2 组并重复。如果没有,则继续在该组内进行二分搜索,始终倾向于较低的一侧,最终您将找到第一个缺失值。


否则,如果您希望最终使用整个组合空间,只需对整个组合空间进行二分搜索,如果前面的值都存在,则检查该位置的值是否与预期值匹配。

If the list you have is ordered, there are 2 methods I can think of that would be better than a linear search.

Assuming that you will not completely fill the combination space, you can use a variation of a binary search.

First, lets call each set of size 'x' a group. So, 0,1,2,3,4,5 is group 1, {0,0} to {5,5} is group 2.

Starting with group 1, check the list position that contain the last value in the group if they were all there. Eg, List[5] == 5. If it does, move on to group 2 and repeat. If it doesn't, proceed to do a binary search within just that group always favoring the lower side, eventually you will find the first missing value.


Otherwise if you expect to use the entire combination space eventually, just do a binary search on the entire combination space, checking if the value at the position matches the expected value if the preceding values all existed.

2024-09-18 02:11:10

一个完整的(天真的)解决方案:

import java.util.*;

public class Test {

    public static String increment(String str) {
        if (str.isEmpty()) return "0";
        int i = str.length() - 1;
        if (str.charAt(i) < '5')
            return str.substring(0, i) + (char) (str.charAt(i) + 1);
        return increment(str.substring(0, i)) + "0";
    }


    public static String nextUnused(Set<String> used) {
        String s = "0";
        while (used.contains(s))
            s = increment(s);
        return s;
    }

    public static void main(String args[]) {
        Set<String> used = new HashSet<String>(Arrays.asList("0", "1", "2", "3",
                "4", "00", "01", "02", "21", "22", "154"));
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            String toUse = nextUnused(used);
            System.out.println("Adding " + toUse);
            used.add(toUse);
        }
    }
}

输出:

Adding 5
Adding 03
Adding 04
Adding 05
Adding 10
Adding 11
Adding 12
Adding 13
Adding 14
Adding 15

您可以通过应用 memoization 来加快速度 到增量方法。

A complete (naive) solution:

import java.util.*;

public class Test {

    public static String increment(String str) {
        if (str.isEmpty()) return "0";
        int i = str.length() - 1;
        if (str.charAt(i) < '5')
            return str.substring(0, i) + (char) (str.charAt(i) + 1);
        return increment(str.substring(0, i)) + "0";
    }


    public static String nextUnused(Set<String> used) {
        String s = "0";
        while (used.contains(s))
            s = increment(s);
        return s;
    }

    public static void main(String args[]) {
        Set<String> used = new HashSet<String>(Arrays.asList("0", "1", "2", "3",
                "4", "00", "01", "02", "21", "22", "154"));
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            String toUse = nextUnused(used);
            System.out.println("Adding " + toUse);
            used.add(toUse);
        }
    }
}

Output:

Adding 5
Adding 03
Adding 04
Adding 05
Adding 10
Adding 11
Adding 12
Adding 13
Adding 14
Adding 15

You could probably speed it up quite a bit by applying memoization to the increment-method.

兲鉂ぱ嘚淚 2024-09-18 02:11:10

只需按顺序尝试每种组合,从最短的开始,当有一个未使用时停止?你尝试过吗,这看起来确实很明显吗?

Just try each combination in order, starting with the shortest, and stop when you have one which isn't used? Did you try that, it seems very obvious indeed?

风筝有风,海豚有海 2024-09-18 02:11:10

对于这个问题,我将创建一个特定的对象来存储一个元素(单个数字或数字元组):

class Tuple {
    String key;
    Set<Integer> tuple;
}

关键是数字的串联,有序。
在您的示例中,键将为“0”“1”“2”“3”“4”“5”“01”“02”“03”“05”。

您可以使用 Map 来存储元组,并使用关联键 - 值。

由于键遵循逻辑顺序,因此找到下一个自由元组很容易。您只需从“0”开始并递增键(使用定义的顺序),检查映射以验证元组是否已使用。

在此示例中,第一个空闲元组的键为“04”。通过这个键,创建关联的元组很容易。

For that problem, I would create a specific object to store an element (single number or tuple of numer) :

class Tuple {
    String key;
    Set<Integer> tuple;
}

The key would be the contatenation of the numbers, ordered.
In your example, the keys would be "0" "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "01" "02" "03" "05".

You can use a Map to store the tuples, with the association key - value.

Since the keys respect a logical order, finding the next free tuple is easy. You just start from "0" and increment the key (using the defined order), checking in the Map to verify if the tuple is already used or not.

In this example, the first free tuple has the key "04". From this key, creating the associated Tuple is easy.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文