该寄存器之后将包含什么
我似乎无法弄清楚 eax 在这段程序集之后包含什么：
mov edi, [edi+4]
lea eax, [edi+88h]
edi 指向一个类
I can't seem to figure out what eax contains after this peice of assembly:
mov edi, [edi+4]
lea eax, [edi+88h]
With edi pointing to a class
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（4）
加载有效地址获取引用的实际地址。由于某些神秘的原因，符号汇编的编写方式就好像它引用了 edi+88h 的内容，但该指令实际上所做的是加载 edi 寄存器的值加上常量 088h（相当于 <代码>mov eax，edi；添加eax，088h）。我怀疑 edi+4 是一个函数指针：更有可能的是，它是一个 vtbl 指针或数组。
Load Effective Address gets the actual address of the reference. For some arcane reason, the symbolic assembly is written as if it references the content of edi+88h, but what the instruction actually does is loading the value of the edi register plus the constant 088h (equivalent to
mov eax, edi; add eax, 088h). I doubt edi+4 is a function pointer: more likely, it's a vtbl pointer or an array.虽然我对你们的班级一无所知，但可能性不大，但无论如何。
你有多重继承吗？也许
edi+4是第二个虚拟表，而[edi+4]+88h是您要调用的函数指针？或者，根据您的编译器，虚拟表可能位于 +4，无论哪种情况，eax 都包含要调用的虚拟函数的地址。A long shot, since I know nothing about your class, but here goes anyway.
Do you have multiple inheritance? Perhaps
edi+4is the second virtual table, and[edi+4]+88his a function pointer you wish to call? Or depending on your compiler, it might be that the virtual table is located at+4, in either caseeaxcontains the address of the virtual function to call.根据 edi 的使用，它可能最终指向一个内存位置，但 lea 并不总是这样使用：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addressing_mode#Useful_side_effect。
Based on the use of
edi, it probably ends up pointing to a memory location, butleaisn't always used like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addressing_mode#Useful_side_effect.看起来有些记录刚刚被访问。
It looks like some record is just getting accessed there.